There are many different types of family relationships out there. The way that you embrace the type of family you grow up in is what will shape your future. The different types of family relationships have an effect both good and bad on everyone inside of that family. Over time, many families have broken the “rules” by divorcing or having children without being married. These two things are big changes considering 100 or even 50 years ago, it wasn’t heard of. Also, many years ago there was no such thing as “different families.” There was a mom, dad, and children. Nowadays, that is definitely not always the case. According to Fitzpatrick, M.A., & Badzinski, D.M (1994), family is defined as “a group of people who create and maintain a mutual identity, emotional bonds, and communication boundaries through how they interact with each other and with others; who share a common past, present and future; and who may or may not share a biological heritage.” There are different types of families, though. Families can be nuclear, gay or lesbian, extended, blended or single- parent. Each of these families has different effects on children as well as the parents. A nuclear family is what some people view as they typical family in the United States today but actually, it is a minority. A nuclear family consists of a wife and husband and their biological or adopted children. Nuclear families have many benefits in today's society. For parents, the presence of more than one adult can mean an increase in the family’s income along with support for each parent as he or she finds that balance between parenting, work, and other responsibilities, that most every parent struggles to find. With a smaller number of people to support within the family, f... ... middle of paper ... .... “Experts say the behavior could be the outcome of the angst and humiliation the child experiences while growing. There are very obvious reasons to make the child feel abnormal, different and unaccepted. In single parenting, a single person decides what is best for the child and sometimes takes extreme measures to get it accomplished,” (Magnier, 2007). So, the “typical” nuclear family is not that prevalent anymore. There are many other types of families in the United States and each of those families affects children differently. The effects can be either negative or positive depending on how optimistic or pessimistic both the adults and kids are about their particular situation. Times are changing. Some things are positive, others are negative. As a human race, we can either embrace these changes or choose to not be a part of it. Either way, change is inevitable.
“In the 1950’s, 86 percent of children lived in two-parent families, and 60 percent of children were born into homes with a male breadwinner and a female homemaker” (Conley 451). In contrast, “in 1986, fewer than 10 percent of U.S. families consisted of a male breadwinner, a female housewife, and their children, a figure that has since fallen to 6 percent” (Conley 455). Modern families come in all shapes and sizes. They no longer follow the strict nuclear family layout. There are many reasons why the nuclear family is no longer the most common family type. Some of these reasons include increased divorces, increased acceptance of different sexual orientations, increased amount of couples choosing not to get married/common-law marriages, increased amount of people choosing not to have children (rise of birth control methods), increased amount of families with both parents working/needing to work, etc. Personally, I do not believe the decrease in the nuclear family model is a bad thing. By definition a family is just a group of people who are related or married/in a relationship and it can still be a healthy and well-functioning unit no matter the size or combination of people it is made up
Times have changed since our parents were children and families today face different challenges than those of a decade or two ago. Over the past few decades the concept of family has been revolutionized. A "traditional" family no longer consists of two parents of the opposite sex in which the father is the "breadwinner," and the mother stays at home to raise the children. Today's family is as diverse as the world it must exist in. The important thing about today's family is that success does not just happen; a strong family takes effort.
Originally, the nuclear family consisted of a married man and woman along with their biological children living under the same roof. Today, the structure of a family involves a variety of models with great diversity. “Over the past three decades, the number of children born out of wedlock…tripled from 10% to 33%...10% live in patchwork families and 15% live with only one parent. Every fifteenth child…raised by grandparents” (Stanglin, 2017). By 2030, forecasters predict 40 percent of families will consist of only one parent (Stanglin, 2017). Other factors effecting members of a family unit are incarceration and foster care. According to The Annie E. Casey Foundation (2016) policy report, “5 million children have had a parent incarcerated at some point in their lives” (p. 1). When the mother is incarcerated, most children end up in the foster care system. The foster care system has a total of nearly 428,000 children on any given day. The traditional nuclear family has transformed to include other definitions of membership, what a family unit looks like, and numerous factors influencing group changes along life’s
The phrase “Nuclear Family” is a concept whose true complexity seems to have escaped our intellectual grasps until recent decades. Before, this model of familial relations was regarded as the standard or the cultural norm that no one seemed to question because this was the way it had been done, in most societies, since people could remember. Today though, with our ever-evolving cultures and belief systems, the ideology of and behind a nuclear family has come into question. What is or should be the true definition of a nuclear family? Is a nuclear family really the best way to raise children and sustain society? Are there any negative aspects of the nuclear family model that we may have not considered, and if so, what are they? These questions and others have become the center of a worldwide debate regarding family systems and diversity; the interesting part is the subjectivity of this topic and the amount of factors that affect the arguments from both sides, making it difficult to reach any sort of viable conclusion. Our modern world rapidly evolves in both subjects of technology and sociopolitical ideology, causing questions such as these to be subject to many different perspectives and thus causing many different reactions.
Over the past decades, the patterns of family structure have changed dramatically in the United States. The typical nuclear family, two married parents with children living together in one household, is no longer the structure of the majority of the families today. The percentage of single-parent families, step-families and adopted families has increased significantly over the years. The nuclear family is a thing of the past. Family situations have tremendous influence upon a child’s academic achievement, behavior and social growth.
The myth of a nuclear family can be discouraging to modern society. For example, Gary Soto essay talks about a nine year old mexican boy wanting his family to be like the “perfect families” on television. He wants his family to sit at the dinner table eating turtle soup while they all get dressed up. His family laughs in his face because the ideals that are portrayed on
The term “nuclear family” refers to “the part of a family that includes only the father, mother, and children” (Miriam-Webster, n.d.). In comparison, William Bennett, author of “Reversing The Moral Collapse of the American Family, The Broken Hearth” defined the nuclear family as “a monogamous married couple with their children” (2001, p. 12). I agree with both definitions, but choosing Bennett’s definition as the key to rebuilding a troubled society.
Parke challenges the contrary believe of the nuclear family being the ideal family form in today’s society and perhaps in the past, as well. “We have chosen a period in our history that we imagine or recall as being a particularly good period for families and then used this era as the baseline for comparisons with the contemporary state of the family” says Parke (2013, p.3). He goes on to say this idea is misleading as several factors were ignored. The following statement: “families do not exist in a social vacuum” refers to the idea that the dynamics of family include several other factors aside from a mother or a father (e.g., extended family, friends, neighbors, etc). Clearly, there is more to a family than just a mother or a father. As
The nuclear family is a married man and women who are raising their biological children. It is better known as the common view of a household. In the 1960’s this family, and religious, view was followed by the majority of the people in the United States that if one had to guess they type of family one live with there would be an eighty percent chance that they live in a nuclear family (Luscombe). This image of a family has been engraved into our brains that anything else is unacceptable. However, over the years that view has been altered by single divorce, single parenting, cohabitation, children born out of wedlock, and gay parenting. In fact, the U.S. has seen drastic rise different types of families over the last fifty years (Castelloe).
During the 1950’s the misconception that the nuclear family, which presumes that a self-supporting unit composed of two heterosexual parents legally married and engaging in separate masculine and feminine family roles was predominant and ideal (Palczewski & DeFrancisco, 2014). Understandably, looking at what a family looks like and means now from this perspective could lead one to believe that the American family is deteriorating, however, this is a result of the golden age view about the nuclear family and was never a reality (Afifi, lecture). The American family is not deteriorating, the common understanding of what a family looks like is changing due to the increase of diversity, dependency on discourse based communication, and an emphasis
The 1950s almost inevitably invoke an image of the so called "traditional" nuclear family portrayed in famous TV shows like "Happy Days." In this "golden age" of the family, happily married men and women lived in suburban homes raising families. Women gleefully fulfilled their roles as mothers and wives while men contently worked to provide for their families. Everyone--men, women, and children were healthy and satisfied. The nuclear family of the 1950s arose due to particular circumstances involving both America’s past and its future.
“Parenting is emotionally and intellectually draining, and it often requires professional sacrifice and serious financial hardship” (McLanahan and Sandefur 98). Indeed, parenting is tough. In most cases, children live in one of the two main family types, a nuclear or single parent family. To ensure a bright future for the nation in the years to come, children must grow up in an environment that is conducive for optimal development. After all, they are the next generation. But exactly which family type would be best for a child? In which family type would a child best learn morals, be prepared for the outside world and receive the items needed? Many people have concluded that a nuclear family is more beneficial for a child when compared to
The word “family” is unique, special, and controversial among different cultures and ethnicities. As defined by Random House Western Dictionary, a family is “any group of persons closely related by blood, as parents, children, uncles, aunts, and cousins” (Dictionary.com). Although the definition from Random House follows the infamous proverb of, “blood is thicker than water,” my definition of family does not. Family is not defined or restricted by blood relations. In my mind, a family is simply a group of people, who loves, supports, and helps each other unconditionally, and endlessly. Regardless of one’s sexual orientation or preference, all families embody these common principles. Thus, a family unites its members through the strong bonds and kinships formed when people come together. (Great intro.)
The concept of family has change a lot over the past decides. Not only this, but the notions of family are very different depending on the countries, but the idea of a family (mother, father, children) has remained the same. In the 1950 's the normal American family consisted of a breadwinner father, homemaker mother, and several children, all living in homes in the suburbs on the outskirts of a larger city. It was a narrow view of a model family, yet it saturated the media and was widely accepted as the ideal and most normal. Now a days, a family can be anything, form a single mother raising her boy, to a gay couple raising adopted children. The myth of the “Model Family” does not persist to this day because gender roles have changed allot since the 1950s, the involvement of technology and devices in the house, and children are now raised by a variety of caring adults.
There are so many different types of family relationships. Whatever form a family takes; it is an important part of everyone’s life. My family has played an important role in my life. Good family relationships serve as a foundation to interactions with others. Supportive families will help children to thrive. The quality of the family relationship is more important than the size of the family. Making the relationships priority, communication, and providing support for one another is key to developing relationships. Family relationships are what make up our world today; they shape the ways that we see things and the ways that we do things.