Family Before Law

652 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Domestic violence between family members

Unsuspected murderers, gangbangers, abusers, and molesters dishonor their families by committing indescribable crimes, and typically, these families move in order to start a new life without prejudice. Instead of families relocating, however, families can kill the members in their family that disobeyed the law in order to regain respect. Going through the process of finding prosecutors, jury members, and paying for jail time before the trial, wastes taxpayer dollars. The government can literally not afford to spend these taxpayer dollars with a seventeen trillion dollar debt. Instead, let family members decide whether or not to carry out justice as they are victims of the crimes too. The victim's families and the family of the criminal deserve to live in peace, and they can do this through honor killings and the phrase “an eye for an eye.”
People kill for many reasons; whether is it out of anger, embarrassment, fear, desperation, mercy, or disobedience of religion. “The rights of our parents are that we obey them but this obedience is not blind, deaf and dumb.” (Zuberi). In Islam women must obey their parents and husbands. Every year thousands of women are killed for leaving or denying an arranged marriage. Arranged marriages are set up by the parents of the woman; whereas, forced marriages happen by coercion. Some methods of coercion by parents include: threats, blackmail, fraud, bribes, and parents not speaking to their child for month on end. If a woman refuses an arranged marriage the parents feel that the daughter has disgraced them and the future spouse and his family. Parents of the daughter who refused the marriage feel that killing their daughter would stop her from marrying someone else and bring back the family name.
...

... middle of paper ...

...his or her religion in a context that might be different from theirs? People have the right to kill others in the Middle East because of how the Qur’an is interpreted in their society. It is a cultural matter that the rest of the world needs to stay out of.
Honor is the most important thing above all to a family. To protect the honor seems to be the males job. When disgrace is brought upon the family name there is only one solution to fixing the problem, which is eliminating the problem causer. Multiple factors are punishable by death if they dishonor a family. Obey one’s parents and male relatives will be the best bet to living. Honor killings have been known of for many generations and will be honored for years to come. No one wants a bad name so to protect the name and to reserve the respect anyone would want we must honorably kill those who dishonor the name.

Show More
Related

  • Honor in No One Writes to the Colonel and Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Garcia-Marquez

    1610 Words  | 4 Pages

    Every culture in the world has its own unique set of values that they adhere to in life. The most important value to people is their honor. Honor is a very important factor in a person life that they will stop at nothing to make sure it is not lost. This endless pursuit of keeping honor can causes both positive and negative effects to a society. The reason honor is a main driving force in a person's life is for the simple fact that it determines how the society views that person's integrity, honesty and truthfulness to himself and family.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Ethan Couch Murder

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    Families do not receive the privilege to see their family members again so to equal out the justices, the one that has committed the crime should get the punish they deserve. Just in record, the death penalty will do no good because they will never have the time to think about what they did. They should serve jail time a minimal of ten years with no parole. Let’s us start by education are children in a young age of what is right and wrong and we can make a

    Read More

  • Honor in Colonial Latin America

    388 Words  | 1 Pages

    Honor, just as today, is the way your name is viewed by others in the public. Threats toward ones honor might be defended differently in the public view. Honor varied between genders. Males felt it necessary to defend their honor when another slighted their masculinity, family, or physical ability. Females felt honor too. They often saw it important to defend their honor like did the males. Usually it was defended by gossip or name-calling but on occasion did result in physical violence as well. Females saw honor in a moral sense. Ones sexual activity or lack thereof before marriage, fidelity in marriage and celibacy after marriage all proved a woman to be honorable. Just like today, a personal reputation would be on the line if called a demoralizing name.

    Read More

  • Dead Death Closure

    1281 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the movie Dead Man Walking, Earl Delacroix, the father of a murder victim, is seen at the funeral of the murderer, Matthew Poncelet, after his execution. While there, he says that he hasn’t found the peace he thought he would have after Matthew was executed and that his heart was still filled with hatred (Dead Man Walking.) This is the case for many families, capital punishment may give the impression that the murder victim’s family gains closure from the execution of the murderer, but that is rarely the case; even years after the execution has taken place, some family members of the victim suffer from unresolved grief and the murderer’s family is also affected in a negative manner. Capital Punishment is often viewed as the “right” option to put the families out of their pain and suffering, but in many cases, it’s just not effective in providing closure for the families and might make things worse; therefore, it should not be a valid reason for execution.

    Read More

  • A Time to Kill

    915 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the death penalty alone cannot bring back the life of those who have been murdered, it can serve as ultimate justice for the victims and their families. The deterrence of the death penalty can save lives. While opinions abound on both sides of the fence, in the use of the death penalty on juveniles, no one can argue with the fact that the voices of those murdered cannot be heard. Juveniles may not have fully developed brains, as Raeburn argues, but this is not an adequate excuse to dismiss the death penalty. American society cannot afford to babysit murderers, nor can they rehabilitate them. The end of the innocence begins when an innocent life is taken, and the sanctity of life is held defenseless.

    Read More

  • The Pro And Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bob McCulloch, Missouri state prosecutor, argues that this type of punishment is very appropriate. He also points out that the death penalty punishment is not applicable to the type of murder that we daily see on the television, or read about in the newspapers, but to those that are “particularly horrendous,” such as multiple murders, murders for hire, and so on (qtd in “The Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty”). He even goes on to describe one murder case that he worked on, as an example of a crime worthy of the death penalty. It’s the case of a man who gutted his girlfriend and her infant, and then cut off the baby’s head. A lot of death penalty supporters, sixty five percent to be more precise, believe in the Biblical saying “an eye for an eye,” arguing that the punishment really should fit the crime. They also believe that the family of a victim has the right to some type of a closure, and that the death penalty is the best way to provide them with one. John McAdams, Marquette University’s professor of political science, argues that by executing a murderer one cannot go wrong: “If you execute a murderer and it stops other murders, ...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    2142 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thus, many groups of people are involved in a death penalty case. However, other also equally important factors are also involved, such as money and time. Each state varies in amount expended towards death penalty and life imprisonment. However, in Texas, the state with the highest capital punishment rates in the United States alone, it is stated that each individual in a death penalty case “costs taxpayers about $2.3 million. That is about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years.” This is one detail that those opposing death penalty implement in their argument to abolish said act. Another factor is time invested in these cases. Most death penalty cases range from 6 to 10 years, factoring death row and other complications. Thus, the more time invested in determining guilt or innocence, the more money of taxpayers are being consumed. However, as depleting as it is, there is a good reason for. They take so long because they are trying to avoid as many mistakes as possible, meaning they don’t wanted to convict or even worse execute an innocent person wrongly accused or framed for a

    Read More

  • Is the Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

    1249 Words  | 3 Pages

    Take into consideration that the Constitution states that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can not be taken away without due process. The offenders committing the brutal, heinous crimes have not applied this right to the victims of their crimes. Why should the government take their rights into consideration when the victims rights meant so little to them? People always put forth the idea that killing is wrong in any sense, yet they don’t want to punish the people that commit the crimes. If a person is so uncompassionate for human life and not care what happens; are sick enough to harm someone else, they should also pay the price with their lives.

    Read More

  • Family Law Essay

    1641 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Family Law Legislation Amendment Act of 2011 and whether it has Reduced Violence and Abuse for Women and Children

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Essay: The Death Penalty

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    Using capital punishment would put an end to the killer’s suffering, and let him leave the world peacefully. With the death penalty in place, the victim’s family can finally get closure. Families that have been through the intense experience of losing a loved one might call for lex talionis, or eye for an eye. They could believe that the killer took their loved one from them and the only acceptable recourse would be to take the murderer’s life. This retaliation for the family might be the most important reason to instill the death penalty in today’s

    Read More

  • Australian Family Law

    1918 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this day and age there are many variations of what constitutes a couple or family in comparison to many years ago. Long ago the idea of a ‘nuclear family’ was considered the norm; it consisted of the conventional husband, wife and children . But as our society progressed through the years this definition became less conventional and criticisms were made, this definition of ‘family’ did not account for gay unions, soul parents nor did it acknowledge the prevalence of extended family. The definition of family has changed over time, as have the socially defined roles of mothers and fathers. Within these varied family units, situations occur in which divorces and separations take place and a lot of the times these tricky situations may involve children, which can make an already tricky situation even more problematic. There are pieces of legislation which are in place which aim to protect the best interests of a child during the time their parents are going through divorce but sometimes these avenues can be more problematic and ultimately destroy unions whereas other avenues of dispute resolution such as mediation, albeit with its own criticisms, helps to keep relationships afoot in that it provides an opportunity for peaceful and mutual agreements to be made in a more laid back environment.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Thesis

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Death Penalty should be discontinued to the families, human rights, and statistics.     The families of the victim and the family of the one, who committed the crime, have no closure at all. The death penalty is killing a human for being convicted of a terrible crime one family may think its right but both suffer by their lost ones. “Although true closure is never really possible for the families, studies have shown that the continual process, along with the returning to court for many years, force families to confront the gruesome details of the crime many times over, making it impossible to get on with their lives. As difficult as that is the question is weather the victims needs are met effectively by killing someone else and causing another family grief and pain as well as adding to the cycle of violence.”  (Progress) As both families do not want to see each other because they all have pain and hate for one another. They both relive the last memories of their loved one and they can’t help but cry and stare at the pictures they were once happy in. The families both have sadness when its their loved ones birthday. If the victim is married or have kids, their kids suffer and the husband/wife suffer as well. Although the families will never get there loved one back they still suffer on what had happen. Both families blame one another for having to take flowers, to their dead family member or visit their family member in a cemetery because of what happen. None of them is truly happy that they lost a family member. The families miss the person who seemed so happy, and also know that they are in a better place watching over them. Although the families aren’t happy about losing them, but are relieved to know that nothing else can hurt them. As one family feels sorry for the other family, there could be the family that doesn’t care what happens but wants everyone to suffer the way they are suffering about the tragic death of one family member.

    Read More

  • Politics and The Death Penalty

    4240 Words  | 9 Pages

    The key issues involve whether the U.S. should sustain the current death penalty system, abolish it in favor of life in prison without parole plus restitution, or only reform the system to make it less costly and free of class, racial, and mental illness discrepancies. Many people have a stake in the issue. Organizations such as Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union are against the death penalty because they claim it is a cruel and unusual form of punishment, while other groups such as the National Center for Policy Analysis support the death penalty because they believe that life sentences do not deter homicide. Furthermore, victims’ families have a stake in the issue because they deserve justice for their murdered loved ones, and convicted murders have a stake because their own lives are in jeopardy as they sit on death row. Most importantly, all the citizens of the United States are involved in the matter, since the way in which we punish crime affects public safety.

    Read More

  • Family Law

    1244 Words  | 3 Pages

    Family Law (Law Express) 2th edition, by Jonathon Herring, published by Pearson Education Limited 2009

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Should be Abolished

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family. These family members feel l...

    Read More

More about Family Before Law

Open Document