Failure of the Presbyterian Experiment of the 1640’s and 1650’s
‘The years 1640-60 witnessed the most complete and drastic revolution
which the Church of England has ever undergone’[1].
With the ending of the civil war, institutions of State collapsed with
leading figures put on trial and executed. The 1640’s was a time of
immense political upheaval and saw the emergence of a myriad of
independent or semi- independent sects. The Presbyterian movement
gained its strength from a union between the laity and the church of
those who believed that Presbyterian Puritanism was the only way to
guarantee religious stability. With the price of War having been
exacted in human suffering, the Presbyterians, with the backing of the
Government, were intent that peace should prevail under Presbyterian
values. However, although around seventy classes of Presbyterian
churches had been initially formed, by the 1650’s only a few remained
active. This essay looks to explain what factors contributed to this
demise.
There are two salient arguments advocated by scholars for this.
Firstly the existing and deep rooted allegiance of many lay people to
the Church of England and secondly with diversity of belief allowed to
flourish; there was a loss of national identity therefore engendering
no national loyalty to the Presbyterian cause. So were the
Presbyterians ‘undone by an unlimited Christian liberty’[2]? Or did
the strength of the Anglican Church win through? What seems certain
is that by the mid 1650’s those that had welcomed revolution were
‘appalled by the Pandora’s box which they had unwittingly opened’[3]
and were socially, politically ...
... middle of paper ...
... The Godly Nation’’ in John Morrill
(ed) Oliver Cromwell and The English Revolution. pg
[6] J.F McGregor. ‘’The Baptists: Font of all Heresy’’ in J.F McGregor
and B.Reay (ed) Radical Religion in the English Revolution. Pg 24-27
[7] M,Goldie. Pg 295
[8] B.Capp. ‘’The Fifth Monarchists and popular millenarianism’’ in
J.F McGregor and B.Reay (ed) Radical Religion in the English
Revolution. Pg 165.
[9] B.Reay. ‘’Quakerism and society’’ in Radical Religion in the
English Revolution. Pg 164
[10] B.Reay ‘Radicalism and Religion in the English Revolution: an
Introduction’ in Radical Religion in the English Revolution. Pg 9.
[11] J.Morrill ‘The Church in England 1642-9’ in Reaching to the
English Civil War 1642-1649. Pg 90
[12] M.Goldie. Pg 295
[13] Morrill. The impact of the English Civil War. Pg 66
In The Voices of Morebath: Reformation and Rebellion in an English Village, renowned scholar Eamonn Duffy investigates the English Reformation. Duffy pears through the eyes of the priest of a small, remote village in Southwestern England. Using Sir Christopher Trichay’s records of the parish, Duffy illustrates an image of Reformation opposite of what is predominantly assumed. Duffy argues the transformation that took place between 1530 and 1570, through the transition of four monarchs, was much more gradual that many interpret. Even though state mandate religious change affected the community of Morebath, the change did not ensue the violence that is often construed with the Reformation. Sir Christopher Trichay’s leadership and his portrayal of community life, the development and removal of St. Sidwell, and the participation in the church through stores develop Duffy’s argument of appeasement rather than violence during the English Reformation.
Gary B. Nash argues that the American Revolution portrayed “radicalism” in the sense on how the American colonies and its protesters wanted to accommodate their own government. Generally what Gary B. Nash is trying to inform the reader is to discuss the different conditions made by the real people who were actually fighting for their freedom. In his argument he makes it clear that throughout the revolution people showed “radicalism” in the result of extreme riots against the Stamp Act merchants, but as well against the British policies that were implemented. He discusses the urgency of the Americans when it came to declaring their issues against the British on how many slaves became militants and went up against their masters in the fight
In the 1700’s the Puritans left England for the fear of being persecuted. They moved to America for religious freedom. The Puritans lived from God’s laws. They did not depend as much on material things, and they had a simpler and conservative life. More than a hundred years later, the Puritan’s belief toward their church started to fade away. Some Puritans were not able to recognize their religion any longer, they felt that their congregations had grown too self-satisfied. They left their congregations, and their devotion to God gradually faded away. To rekindle the fervor that the early Puritans had, Jonathan Edwards and other Puritan ministers led a religious revival through New England. Edwards preached intense sermons that awakened his congregation to an awareness of their sins. With Edwards’ sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” he persuades the Puritans to convert back to Puritanism, by utilizing rhetorical strategies such as, imagery, loaded diction, and a threatening and fearful tone.
During the years of 1675 and 1676 the North American colonies experienced conflicts that shaped the dynamics of their colonial life. King Phillip's War would effectively end relations between the New England colonists and the Indians. Also, the rebellion in Virginia led by Nathaniel Bacon stressed the growing discontent of poor frontier farmers for British rule. The consequences of these two events clearly had an impact on different levels that would extend well beyond their time. Therefore, the years 1675 and 1676 played a very significant role in the Northern American colonies.
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
Religion of the protestant church was an important factor in the pre-war timeline culture. The Second great awakening, which occurred in the 19th century, greatly impacted American society. This new point of view in terms and matters of faith led northerners to cherish the theory of Christian perfection, a theory that in fact was applied to society in an attempt to eliminate social imperfection. On the other hand, southerners reacted by cherishing a faith of personal piety, which focused mainly on a reading of the Bible; however, it expressed very little concern in addressing society’s problems.1
Religion was the foundation of the early Colonial American Puritan writings. Many of the early settlements were comprised of men and women who fled Europe in the face of persecution to come to a new land and worship according to their own will. Their beliefs were stalwartly rooted in the fact that God should be involved with all facets of their lives and constantly worshiped. These Puritans writings focused on their religious foundations related to their exodus from Europe and religions role in their life on the new continent. Their literature helped to proselytize the message of God and focused on hard work and strict adherence to religious principles, thus avoiding eternal damnation. These main themes are evident in the writings of Jonathan Edwards, Cotton Mathers, and John Winthrop. This paper will explore the writings of these three men and how their religious views shaped their literary works, styles, and their historical and political views.
Though religion had been so significant in the early colonies, by the mid-1700s church attendance had begun to decline, and organized religion was no longer considered an essential part of colonial life (founders.archives.gov). In fact, in his diary Travels in the Confederation, Johann David Schoepf commented that “religion generally, is now very faint among them,” and...
In 1642, King Charles raised his royal standard in Nottingham, marking the beginning of the English Civil War. The next ten years saw the Cavaliers (supporters of the King) and the Roundheads (supporters of the parliament) engaged in a vicious battle for their respective leaders with the Roundheads ultimately victorious. This essay will attempt to explain why civil war broke out in England while summarizing the story behind the antagonism of the two parties.
In 1652 George Fox, standing on Pendle Hill in England, had a vision. This was the beginning of the Religious Society of Friends. Before 1650 the Quaker movement were basically unknown, in a year or two the seemed to be all over the place. This time period was called the Quaker Explosion. George Fox saw a great people to be gathered and this people included Puritans, Separatists and presumably others without a label. Among all these different kinds of people what was there in common to make them feel that Fox was what the wanted? The answer is probably that that were looking for a spiritual religion, rather than the religion of conformity. There was resentment against ecclesiastical authority and so a readiness to listen to Fox's assurance that there was only one authority Christ himself and that his authority was to be known directly in the human heart. The message that "Christ has come to teach his people himself" may be called the slogan of the early Quakers.
Religion played a huge part in Salem Massachusetts during the witch trials. They left England for religious freedom but in Salem they don't offer that there is just one religion Puritanism. Puritans were wanted to live by a fixed set of moral code, they believe that all sins should be punished. The Puritans also believed God would punish sinful behavior. Puritans also believed that the Devil was a real God. Everyone was faced with a struggle between good and evil, but they believed that Satan would select the weakest individuals which was children, women, and the mentally ill to carry out his work because their will was easily bent. Puritans who fell into the Satans hands were considered witches. In Salem, Witchcraft was on of the greatest
Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth I may have been the English Reformation’s greatest benefactors, all because of self interest. Henry VIII was not originally Protestant, but after the pope denied him of his divorce, Henry VIII took things into his own hands. Due to the power kings had in the Middle Ages, Henry VIII was able to control Parliament and force it to do whatever he wanted. So in 1534, Henry VIII forced Parliament to pass a law he made known as the Act of Supremacy. The Act of Supremacy stated that the king ought to be the head of the Church of England. This law gave the king complete power over the Church of England, instead of the pope. However, the type of church and state relationship did not change. Rather all the Act of Supremacy did was take power from the pope and give it to the king. Surprisingly, the Catholics did not retaliate against this strong change. The pope had always been the head of the church, but now the king had taken his position. This serves as an example of nationalism. The Catholics did not think about how removing the pope could harm their religion in any way. However, instead the people blindly followed Henry VIII because he was the leader of the nation and they assumed he was right. Also, by imposing other laws that punished Protestants, Henry VIII did not give the people much of a choice. Fortunately, for Henry VII, nationalis...
Burns, Julia. "Notes MLA 6318". Church and State in Early Modern England. Fall 2013. Dr. D. David.
Pettegree, Andrew. "The English Reformation." BBC History. BBC, 17 Feb 2011. Web. 1 Oct 2013.