Factors are those things that influence a person in his field of work, studies and his way of life. Steve Jobs is called the Silicon Valley pioneer and the author of unique leadership and idea. Steve has come nearly close to achieving his goal, managing to make a name for him in all of the business and technological world.
So what did it take for him to get to the top?
Factors that contributed to his success:
1. Passion: Steve worked in his father’s workbench. He knew from the beginning that his future is in the creation of new things. And then when he met Wozniak, he got to know that those things were the personal computers (technology). They set their company in a garage. Despite the failures, Steve never lose hope. He got fired from the company that he found and his Apple III
…show more content…
Prideful and Over-Confidence: After his first success, Steve Jobs had become too confident and proud of his ability that he refused to acknowledge his own mistakes. He started to humiliate his employees un-necessarily. Steve Jobs was too much proud and too much confident that it contributed to his failure in his technopreneurship journey.
It is said that the pride of man is also the fall of man.
2. Lack of Communication: He was too proud that he failed to communicate to his people and to his employees. He did not think of consulting with others when making big or small decisions. He fired the employee who make any mistake but failed to understand that they were also humans who can make mistakes.
3. Attitude Problem: Steve had a bad temper. His short-tempered nature and rudeness leads him to his failure as a good leader. In fact, Bill Gates was a better leader than Steve. Bill Gates was also polite while Steve Jobs was most of the time rude, if not harsh.
4. Self-Obsessed: Steve Jobs was, of course, self-obsessed. His gives importance, only to himself and no-one else, not even his family. To him his well-being was more important than anyone
in leadership can be traced to his character which is shaped by his moral values and
Jobs had a talent at recognizing other talent. Steve Jobs wasn't a tech person, he didn't know computers, or coding, he knew exactly how to get people to work together and had a vision that no one else had. He got the most value out of people, which speaks for itself. Just look at 2 companies he built... Apple and Pixar
Steve Jobs was an incredibly successful individual. In his 2005 Stanford commencement speech and Steve Jobs: An extraordinary career, Jobs’ reveals the habits he put into practice to achieve his success. There are two habits Jobs’ utilized, be proactive and begin with the end in mind.
The modern correspondent to these historic giants is Steve Jobs. From beginning to end his life is a show of the true American determination that the dream makes every strive for. He started in nothing less than his garage programming computers. Years went by, he is jumping over each hurdle as it comes, but he does not capitulate. He keeps going and eventually, Steve Jobs becomes the CEO of one of the biggest computer
Steve Jobs charisma mostly depends on his knowledge and understanding of the technology he is absorbed. To technology field, Jobs may not compete to his engineers, nevertheless, he, together with Wozniak, has been the founder of Apple, and they also produced the very first hardware together (Isaacson, 2012). From this point of view, his understanding in technological field combined with visionary gift help him develop his vision and deliver it properly to his employees.
Steve’s work made him outrageously famous in popularity and fame. He emerged into the spotlight very quickly due to the co-founding of Apple Co. His popularity and fame increased over the years that he kept introducing new products for consumers to buy. Many people like to call him “once in a generation genius”. (“Steve Jobs” pg.1) In 1982 Time Magazine earlier named his apple computer as the “Machine of the Year” aside with a long profile of Jobs and then got famous for it. (Riggertj pg 1) Later he was awarded the “national Medal of Technology” by President Ronald Reagan in the category “Greatest Public Service by an individual 35 years or under”.(Riggertj pg 1) In 1989 Jobs was named “Entrepreneur of the Decade” by Inc. Magazine. On November 2007, Jobs was named the most powerful and intriguing person in business by Fortune Magazine. Two films of Disney’s “John Carter” and Pixar’s “Brave” were dedicated to Steve Jobs. (The Life and Legacy of Steve Jobs” pg.1) Jobs later was chosen a
Also, the embodiment of both these qualities to the extreme degree was evidenced in Steve is rare in other Leaders, perhaps we as team now believe ― how this bundle of conflicting behavior can coexist in Steve Jobs ( in a single human being )
Steve Jobs was an exemplary leader. In the article it states, “Leaders can learn a lot from the late Apple CEO, but not all of it should be emulated.” In the speech it states, “And just last year, with the introduction of the IPad, Apple jumpstarted an entirely new product category that no one thought they could live without.” Both the article and the speech are recognizing Jobs as being an exemplary leader. The article is saying that jobs leadership style should be studied but not imitative. The speech recognizes his product the IPad and says that, with its introduction it started a brand new category that Jobs led. Jobs leadership style was very much complex. Jobs was focus this is part of why his products have become some of the most treasured in history. He picked a necessity, industrialized a product, and spent his energy finalizing the product. He picked technology and made technology his life. His ability to set a goal and stand dedicated was the finest ability in making him
Steve Jobs used leadership and focus to make an empire known as Apple. Jobs would take 100 or so people on a retreat just to simply come up with the next year 's inventions. He would start with a list of ten and have it narrowed down to just three. Jobs wanted to simplify these ideas so it could be more consumer friendly.
In chapter eleven case study, we were asked, What special qualities of Steve Jobs seem to have contributed to his leadership success as Apple’s CEO? We think Steve Jobs was a successful leader because he was imaginative; passionate about his job, he had the ability to push employees to create new things, had confidence, and believed
In comparison to Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg also went through many struggles before he reached his success. Mark Zuckerberg was a self starting man before he attended Harvard
The book, Steve Jobs and Apple, is a biography of one of the most intelligent man in the world, and his successful company. Steve Job was, and still is, one of the most well known men around the world. He is not only known for being extremely intelligent, but for being one of the founder of Apple. He and his co-founder, Steve Wozniak, created one of the most successful companies in the world. Apple has grown, and is still growing ot be one the largest and most worldwide companies ever to be known. This book not only allows people to understand more about the technology they are using, but to learn more about the people who created it.
Overall, Steve Jobs was a great inventor. He changed the world with his many technological advances and the opening of his now world-famous company, Apple. He showed great determination, skill, and knowledge throughout all of his undertakings. Steve Jobs will never be forgotten and his inventions still live on today.
As Isaacson recalls in his biography on Jobs’ life, the first thing that Jobs did at Apple was cut out the convoluted product lines, instead shifting the focus on “four great products” (3). Already, Jobs’ tendency towards conscientiousness showed in his leadership style. Rather than leading an Apple that produced countless variations of the computer, Jobs saw the importance of efficiency. Just as a conscientious person desires to accomplish a task as well as possible, Jobs’ leadership style forced Apple to commit to making only four computers the best possible products. The next test of Jobs’ leadership style would be the creation of the iPod in 2001, the product that would redefine the music consumption market. Interestingly, Gladwell’s exposé of Steve Job’s leadership process likens Jobs to a “tweaker” rather than an inventor, citing the iPod as one such example (5). Rather than creating a brand new product, Jobs was committed to creating the perfect product for music playback. During Jobs’ time at Apple, he would often refine existing ideas until it fit his vision rather than creating something new. One famous quote attributed to Steve Jobs is “I’ll know it when I see it” (Gladwell 6). By constantly pushing his engineers and designers until they created a product that fit his vision, much to the chagrin of those working for him, Steve Jobs was able to release products that would revolutionize their markets, just as the iPod did. This penchant for perfection stems from Jobs’ tendency towards neuroticism. Although neuroticism is often regarded by many as a negative factor to successful leadership, I argue that neuroticism was key to Jobs’ leadership style. In Jobs’ case, the appearance of neuroticism through a drive for perfection created a leadership style that allowed Jobs to lead his company in creating
Although Steve and Bill are competitors, there are similarities between Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Both of them are the most successful CEO’s in the world. Though they were college dropouts, but they still achieved a lot of success in their own way. Steve was a very innovative man. As the English proverb goes by “ Have no fear of perfection - you will never reach it.” by Salvador Dali. No matter how many times he failed, he could develop things from his own idea and turn them into a successful product. In 1979 Apple’s first product was introduced, people like it very much because of its simplicity and innovative ideas. Later on in year 1980, the company showed a tremendous performance, where its share rose by 32% (Messa, 1998). Similarly, Bill Gates was also like that, but just that Steve was in a company which makes hardware prod...