Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
advantage n disadvantage of foreign direct investment
foreign direct investment benefits and costs
costs of foreign direct investment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The purpose of this essay is to demonstrate what are the main challenges of assessing the impact of FDI on economic development. In other words, we would like to comprehend why is it tough to assess that there is a positive relationship between FDI and economic development. While it is not necessary to recall the definition of an FDI and its different elements, it is worth defining economic development which is slightly different from economic growth. Indeed, the economic development includes economic growth but it is rather a process than a data. It contains components such as inequalities and poverty drop, public welfare, steady institutions. On the other hand, economic growth exclusively refers to the evolution of national income. As a matter of fact, theoretically, FDI is seen as a key factor …show more content…
Natural resources highlight this claim. Indeed, 80% of total FDI in Ecuador are made in the oil industry. However, these FDIs have not had any positive consequences on economic development in Ecuador. In fact, they have less employment effect, there are fewer technological spill-over because MNCs do not have the need to buy a significant amount of inputs from the host country. However, again, it depends on the company’s will. So, in this profit-maximizing case, FDIs replace domestic investments and reduce market share. Thus, we have demonstrated that profit-maximization and FDI made in natural resources are genuine challenges of assessing the impact of FDI on economic development. In the cases we mentioned, thanks to MNCs, FDIs don’t lead to economic development and on the contrary, they are a brake on growth. Now, it would be interesting to understand which challenges host countries are facing inside their own systems. This is the reason why we are going to study challenges such as political risks and terrorism, public investments and economic
Zheng, P. (2009). A comparison of FDI determinants in China and India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(3), 263-279. doi:10.1002/tie.20264
As GDP per capita grows, the country’s standard of living rises with it. This newfound wealthiness allows for nations to invest in infrastructure, such as roads and education, and establish socially-conscious institutions, such as the American EPA, FDA, and CDC. In addition to further increasing quality of life and working conditions, establishment of such infrastructre allows foreign investment to be absorbed even easier: “Findings in literature indicate that a country’s capacity to take advantage of FDI externalities might be limited by local conditions, such as the development of local financial markets or the educational level of the country, i.e., absorptive capacities.” As the citizens become more productive, the government has more funds to invest in its own economy, which further improves the productivity of its citizens. This positive feedback loop eventually produces the necessary infrastructure of the nation begins to support itself. It can then afford to employ more effective and safer means of production, and sweatshops are phased out, no longer necessary. From here, the downsides of sweatshops will be completely gone, and replaced with only net social
C/E/110. FDI in emerging economies: the case of EECThe paper discusses the importance of inbound FDI for emerging economies. Among the considered benefits are economic growth, the growth of internal market, technological sipll -overs and access to cheap managerial know-how. The paper also considers the motivational forces that push and pull investors to stream their capitals into particular destinations and business areas.
Since foreign aid programs are here to stay, it is important to focus on the enormous potential for foreign aid to be effective. One such way is through augmenting a state’s ability to attract foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI is a good option because it has the potential to be a more long-term solution than pub...
One of the most well accepted models of FDI is Buckley and Casson’s (1976) internalisation theory, who developed a model of MNCs and FDIs centered around the interrelationship between market imperfections, knowledge and the internalisation of production and consumption (Buckley and Casson, 2009). Specifically, the theory recognized that multinational corporations are both horizontally and vertically organized, and that the “the vertically integrated firm internalises a market for an intermediate product, just as the horizontal MNE [multinational enterprise] internalises markets for proprietary assets” (Caves, 1996: p.13). In addition, internalisation will occur, and multinational corporations will expand only as far as the advantages, including barriers to entry, are not offset by the costs of control, communi...
In the last 30 years the UK has put in a lot of effort to dramatically increase the inflows of FDI into the country. The strategy succeeded due to the rich and diverse ecosystem of the UK and ease of doing business. The inflow FDI has shown constant growth until 2000, which peaked to $118.8 billion. The IT bubble burst in 2000 caused a dramatic fall in IFDI which can be illustrated in Figure 1. The downfall resulted in the UK attracting only $16.8 billion in 2003. The data shows that the FDI inflows boosted in the period of 2004-2007, and that Mergers and Acquisitions that the Multinational Corporations used to enter the UK, as well as the reduced interest rate, can explain this.
After the initial shock I was more interested in what effects Intel has had in Costa Rica economically, socially and politically. In particular, did the move of Intel into Costa Rica have positive or negative consequences on the small country? In this paper I will examine the dynamics of the relationship between Intel and Costa Rica and will consider the implications of this interaction for large corporations relationships in developing countries. Using the case study of Intel in Costa Rica I will use a costs-benefit analysis to show why foreign direct investment has positive effects on the host economy.
In conclusion, Ireland is favorable country for FDI regarding its markets, resources, knowledge, efficiency, security and foreign trade opportunities. Further, from the country’s attractiveness that integrated with its PESTEL proved that the benefits and control for foreign companies were able to overcome the risks and costs that they have to bear with. The fact that Ireland was also dragged by global economic recession in 2008 had drawn the country’s GDP and economy condition (The World Factbook, 2009). However, the country’s supports due to foreign investment and government commitment in its political-economy regulations are trusted to sustain Ireland in long-term performance.
By definition foreign direct investment is the acquisition of tangible assets such as machinery, land and factories; this type of investment are often between two companies- usually multinationals from different countries. FDI is one of the benefits of globalisation as it has a direct impact on aggregate demand having a follow on effect on technology, job opportunities and increased intellectual property owned by countries. In this essay I will discuss some of the factors that affect a country’s disposition to gaining foreign direct investment.
Over the years, foreign direct investment (FDI) has become a popular way for countries to move capital flows from one country to the other. Basically, foreign direct investment simply refers to an instant when a business entity for a particular country invests in an income generating asset in another country with a hope of return on the investment. Foreign direct investment has its benefits to the foreign investor, the home country and the host country (Froot 1993, 60). However, it should be noted that the benefits that come about as a result of FDI can only be possible if all the three parties follow the right regulations and the ethical ways of doing business is strictly adhered to. This paper sheds some light on the costs and benefits of FDIs to the investors, the home country and the host country. In addition, it will also review how the country and the firms’ level of development and growth play a role in determining the costs and benefits accrued from the FDIs (Weigel, Wagal & Gregory 1997, 56).
It is well documented that Malaysia is a country that experiences fast and rapid growth in its overall economy. According to the Asian Development Bank (ADB), Malaysia has the potential to rise as one of the seven drivers of the Asian economy by 2050 led by China, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and Thailand (Malaysian Insider, 2011). In the 1970’s, Malaysian companies started to focus on foreign investment but the numbers were still small. These investments started off focusing on banking and finance sectors of developed countries such as the US and Australia. The country only began venturing in outward foreign direct investments (OFDI) in the 1990’s. Malaysia’s OFDI has skyrocketed from a low RM0.45 billion in 1980 to RM10.41 billion in 1997, and further to RM36.7 billion in 2007 (Goh and Wong, 2011). Malaysia has been experiencing a peculiar trend when it comes to foreign investments. The country has encountered a drastic drop in FDI inflows whereas FDI outflow has been increasing at a substantial rate especially in 2007 as seen in the graph. It is worth arguing whether OFDI is a able to substitute domestic investments and will it cause a significant drop in output in the domestic markets (Stevens and Lipsey, 1992). From a different viewpoint, OFDI can also complement domestic markets and increases local industry activities by home country multinationals and, as a result boost up domestic output ( Desai et al., 2005). Therefore, there exist a conceptually causal relationship between OFDI and the domestic economic growth that could result in either way. This essay revolves around the efforts of determining the push and pull factors that influences OFDI and critically analyzing the transition effects of Malaysia to...
The main concept discussed in this essay is foreign direct investment. FDI is, according to the OECD, “a category of cross-border investment made by a resident entity in one economy (the direct investor) with the objective of establishing a lasting interest in an enterprise (the direct investment enterprise) that is resident in an economy other than that of the direct investor.” Firms invest in foreign economies in order to exploit their particular advantages and FDI is the preferred process, as opposed to licensing or agreements and exports. The advantages that firms often possess are patented technology, managerial skills, marketing skills and brand names.
Some researchers focused upon the impact of FDI on the different sectors of the economy like agriculture sector, industrial sector, telecommunication, etc., some researchers paid attention to develop different mathematical and statistical model to analyze the role of FDI in economic development. In this study we have collected the data set from the databank of World Bank and have been matched up against the data available on the site of UNCTAD (United Nations- -Conference on Trade and Development). Above two data sources have been chosen because they are the most reliable sources of data and are used by almost every researcher. The data set consists of FDI inflow (US$ mn) and Percentage growth of GDP (in Service Sector) through FDI. The data set is annual and covers the time period of
(b) Small enterprises fear that they may not be able to compete with world class large companies and will go out of the business.
Sukar, A., Ahmed, S., & Hassan, S. (n.d.). THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH. Southwestern Economic Review.