preview

Exposure to Trauma: PTSD

analytical Essay
1515 words
1515 words
bookmark

Bad things happen for everyone. However, describing a psychological or mental health response following exposure to a traumatic event as a single, universal mechanism has turned out to be unachievable goal since there is no single response to it. Moreover, it is apparent that there are individual differences in resilience and risk factors that play a crucial role in response to potentially traumatic event and prevent a description of a response to an event that would affect people uniformly. During the course of a normal life span, most people at different times in their lives are confronted with the adverse events such as the death of a close friend or relative (Kessler, Sonnega, Bromet, Hughes, & Nelson, 1995). However, the argument that exposure to traumatic event can always result in mental health problems has become controversial because it can stigmatize those who do not believe they have been affected in an adverse manner. Fortunately, only a small percentage of people experience severe enough lose or trauma reactions to meet the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), and most people appear to fully recover from any adverse effect within a relatively short period of time, and to successfully overcome potentially traumatic events with little or no disruption in their normal ability to function (Shalev, 2002). Therefore, it is important to note that “the emergence of interest in the concept of resilience comes at the peak of success of the concept of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), serving as a reminder that there is a wide range of possible responses to the same objective event” (Bonanno, Galea, Bucciarelli, & Vlahov, 2007). At the same time, research on the nature of ind... ... middle of paper ... ... Events and PTSD Prevalence Using DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria. Journal of Traumatic Stress October 2013, 26, 537–547 Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., & Stroebe, W. ( 1993). Contemporary themes and controversies in bereavement research. In M. S.Stroebe, W.Stroebe, & R. O.Hansson ( Eds.) , Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 457– 476). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Ozer EJ., Best SR., Lipsey TL., Weiss DS. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 129:52-73. Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J. D. ( 2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748– 766. Rutter M. 1987. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry 57:316–331.

In this essay, the author

  • Opines that describing a psychological or mental health response following exposure to traumatic events as one universal mechanism has turned out to be unachievable goal since there is no single response to it.
  • Argues that the argument that exposure to traumatic events can always result in mental health problems has become controversial because it stigmatizes those who do not believe they have been affected in an adverse manner.
  • Explains that the study of the influence of individual differences on ptsd has helped them understand a word, resilience.
  • Explains that posttraumatic stress disorder is followed by a sudden, dangerous, and overwhelming life event.
  • Explains that ptsd prevalence may vary according to the diagnostic criteria used to define the disorder, but recent empirical research indicates resilience actually reveals the most frequently observed outcomes.
  • Explains that the trauma literature is dominated by studies of ptsd and its treatment, so little was known about the factors that might foster or suppress resilience due to lack of extensive studies on resilience.
  • Argues that resilient factors can be considered the converse of risk factors. they observe unique associations between factors and resilient outcomes and various results depending on different settings.
  • Explains rutter's argument that resilience is more than just the flip side of risk factors, but rather represents qualities encompassing process and mechanism that confer protection.
  • Explains that trauma represents a subjective response to ptes, which is shaped by one's view, perception, or interpretation of the event.
  • Describes optimism as the tendency to have positive expectancies about the future. most optimistic individuals attribute negative events to temporary, specific, and external causes. they exhibit lower levels of depressive symptoms and better physical wellbeing.
  • Explains that there are possible disadvantages of a generalized expectation tendency of positive outcomes.
  • Cites kessler, sonnega, bromet, hughes, m., & nelson, c. b. (2000). diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
  • Explains that bonanno, galea, bucciarelli, and vlahov predict psychological resilience after disaster.
  • Explains that bonanno, papa, and o'neill, have underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events.
  • Explains kilpatrick, resnick, milanak, miller, keyes, k.m., and friedman, m.j.'s findings in the journal of traumatic stress.
  • Explains stroebe, w., hansson, r. o. & stronebe. contemporary themes and controversies in bereavement research.
  • Cites ozer ej, best sr, lipsey tl, weiss ds, brewin, c. r, andrews, b, & valentine, j. d.
Get Access