Exploring the Abortion Issue

3764 Words8 Pages
Exploring the Abortion Issue

When it comes to abortion one can not state that there is simply a conflict between a woman’s right to privacy/autonomy of her body (i.e. the right to choose) and the right to life (particularly the right of the fetus to be born). It is also not adequate to claim that the alternating theories of when life is created is at the core of the conflict over abortion, because the definition of the creation of life does not determine when and why the state will protect the right of the life of the fetus. The overlying issue is a combination of both claims. By carefully analyzing the moral and empirical claims surrounding the abortion issue, we believe that the best position for our candidate is one of pro-choice with some restrictions.

In the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973, Supreme Court Justice Blackbun upheld the position of a woman’s right to privacy, and that the states’ influence over the future of the fetus is more compelling at the stage of fetus viability (Rosenbaum). In his statement, Justice Blackbun did not define when life is created. The NARAL foundation claims that the state does not have the responsibility to “define one’s own conception of existence [the creation of life]” but exerts that it is the responsibility of the state to ensure that women have the right to make decisions about their bodies. This pro-choice decision can be influenced motivations, circumstances and consequences of abortions; the same is true for pro-life positions.

Abortion was legal in the United States since its conception until the mid-nineteenth century (Staggenborg). At the beginning of the 19th century abortion was legal before “quickening,” which usually falls around the second trimester (Staggenbor...

... middle of paper ...

...the World. 15 Apr. 2002. Pregnant Pause.


regnantpause.org%2Flex%2Fworld02.htm>. {unrestricted; internet publication only; plausible}

Wang, Guang-zhen. “The Social and Cultural Determinants of Attitudes Toward Abortion: A Test of Reiss’ Hypotheses.” 2001. The Social Science Journal 41 no 1: 93-105. {primary scholarly; print via internet; authoritative}

What happens to teen pregnancies. Public Agenda. 2004.


{secondary scholarly; print via internet/internet publication only; reputable}

What is the pro-life response to abortionists' arguments?. National Right to Life.

<http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/facts/abortionresponses.html>. {unrestricted; internet publication only; plausible}
Open Document