Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Western marriage as compared to indian marriage
Indian culture in regards to marriage
Indian culture in regards to marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Western marriage as compared to indian marriage
When one attends a wedding, they probably think what a lovely couple the bride and groom make or wonder when they’ll start procreating. Marriage is socially acceptable in the United States and is actually encouraged and expected for heterogeneous couples. But getting married is not as simple as some make it out to be; many people find alternatives to the traditional wedding scene and some refrain from getting married in the first place. I have noticed by observing those around me that people view matrimony differently according to what social class they are in. Most of the marriages in my family have not exactly worked out in everyone’s favor, and so I wanted to research and learn why people get married according to their social status. This paper explores how marriage differs across various social classes. I will assess the rates of marriage and the reasoning behind marriage for the social classes of the lower, middle, and upper varieties.
A social politics article states, “Marriage promotion is a neoliberal policy shifting risk to the shoulders of the poor, aiming to produce ‘strong families’ for the purposes of social security” (Geva, 2011). One may ask: how does the government benefit from making “strong families”? I believe the implied statement here is that married couples make more money and so that means more social security money coming in for the government, meaning the government ultimately benefits from citizens getting married. Statistics show that 48 percent of the population surveyed declared their marital status as married, excluding the people who are married but separated (Census, 2012). Taking this information into consideration, this means that about 52 percent of the population surveyed was not married, whet...
... middle of paper ...
...Why Don't They Just Get Married? Barriers to Marriage among the Disadvantaged. In The Future of Children. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from USF Database.
Fu, X. (2007). Inter-Racial Marriage and Family Socio-economic Status: A Study among Whites, Filipinos, Japanese, and Hawaiians in Hawaii. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 38(4), 533-554. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from USF Database.
Geva, D. (2011). Not just maternalism: marriage and fatherhood in American welfare policy. Social Politics, 18(1), 24-51. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from USF Database.
Lapp, A., & Bradford Wilcox, W. (2013, September 30). The Privilege Of Marriage. National Review, 65(18), 40-41. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from USF Database.
Poppel, F., Mondel, C., & Mandemakers, K. (2008, March). Marriage Timing over the Generations. Human Nature, 19(1), 7-22. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from USF Database.
finally the opportune moment for individuals to build a stable family that previous decades of depression, war, and domestic conflicts had restricted. We see that this decade began with a considerable drop in divorce rates and rise in marriage rates, which is often assumed as the result of changed attitudes and values. However, this situation cannot be only just attributed to women’s
Marriage is the foundation of modern society and has historically been present in most civilizations. Marriage is associated with many positive health outcomes and is encouraged across most racial/ethnic groups. According to Sbarra, Law, and Portley (2011), the social institution of marriage has changed much since the 19th century especially in the way it can be terminated. Married African American or Black men are happier, make more money, are less likely to face poverty, and choose healthier behaviors than their counterparts that are divorced (Bachman, Clayton, Glenn, Malone-Colon, & Roberts, 2005). The converse is true for Black women who seem to be the only sub-group not to achieve the universal health and other benefits gained from marriage (Bachman, et al., 2005). This paradox in marital benefits have many implications including lower martial satisfaction and divorce.
Powell, Jesse. "Marriage Is Masculinity and Coverture | Secular Patriarchy." Secular Patriarchy. N.p., 08 Aug. 2013. Web. 05 Mar. 2014.
Smock, Pamela and Wendy Manning. 2010. “New Couples, New Families: The Cohabitation Revolution in the United States.” Pp. 131-139 in Families as They Really Are, ed. Barbara Risman. NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
Harris, Kathleen. “Work and Welfare Among Single Mothers in Poverty.” The American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 99 Sept. 1993. 317-52.
The most broadly accepted explanations for marital breakdown are essentially race-blind: greater acceptance of nonmarital sex and unwed parenthood so that young people feel less need to marry, widespread affluence so that it is easier to leave an unhappy marriage, less emotional and economic gain from marriage so that there is less reason to get married, and welfare’s marriage penalties that discourage low-income couples from marrying. (Besharov & West)
Marriage, as an institution, has evolved in the last few decades. As society progresses, the ideas and attitudes about marriage have shifted. Today, individuals are able to choose their partners and are more likely marry for love than convenience. While individuals are guaranteed the right to marry and the freedom to choose their own partners, it has not always been this way. Starting from colonial times up until the late 1960’s, the law in several states prohibited interracial marriages and unions. Fortunately, in 1967, a landmark case deemed such laws as unconstitutional. Currently, as society progresses, racism and social prejudice have decreased and interracial marriages have become, not only legal, but also widely accepted.
Marriage is the legal or formally recognized union of a man and a woman, or two people or the same sex as partners in a relationship. Marriage rates in the United States have changed drastically since the last 90’s and early 2000 years (Cherlin 2004). Marital decline perspective and marital resilience perspective are the two primary perspectives and which we believe are the results from the decline. The marital decline perspective is the view that the American culture has become increasingly individualistic and preoccupied with personal happiness (Amato, 2004). The change in attitudes has changed the meaning of marriage as a whole, from a formal institution
One of the issues that demonstrated how sexism and heterosexism shape social welfare policy is the plight of single mothers. The well-being of single-parents, especially single mothers has been an important issue for the United States given that at least 50 percent of children who are currently growing up in the country will spend part of or their entire childhood in a single-parent family (Casey & Maldonado, 2012). As compared to other countries, single-parent families in the United States are worst off with high unemployment rates and poverty rates. This issue demonstrates how sexism and heterosexism influence social welfare policy since it has been the basis of establishment of various regulations to address the problem. The issue has been the basis of the implementation of TANF to deal with the high unemployment and poverty rates of single mothers. However, this policy has been ineffective since it makes people become more independent and does not meet the needs of women effectively. Therefore, it continues to be the basis for policy considerations to help single
Wilcox, W. (2012). The state of our unions 2012 marriage in America : the President's marriage
Schoen, Robert, and Vladimir Canudas-Romo. "Timing Effects on Divorce: 20th Century Experience in the United States." Journal of Marriage and Family 68 (2006): 749-58.
Works Cited Kunz, Jenifer. Think Marriages & Families. Boston: Pearson, 2011. http://www.prs Print. The. Laquer, Estin, Ann.
The institution of marriage is treated differently between the two cultures. Marriage practices are not so important in the American culture, and couples are free to choose; to follow common or to choose a combination of practices. The Americans have not consistently followed their practices and customs and in some cases have adopted other practices. The American culture is not strong on the institution of marriage as it is for India. The current American society does not consider marriage institution; its importance comes after career and financial matters. This is evident in the way the society perceives marriages; marriages are secondary to career and financial matters. Americans can choose to divorce in order to pursue career of because of financial matters. The high rates of divorce also explain how the society views the institution of marriage. India considers the marriage institution as very important and should be treated with all respect by all in the society. The importance of the marriage institution is evident from the marriage practices that have remained consistent in the Indian cu...
Bennett, Jessica. "The Case Against Marriage." Newsweek. Newsweek, 11 June 2010. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
Marriage is traditionally defined as a social institution uniting men and women in special forms of mutual dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining families (Polomeno). At the age of 16, with parental consent, a majority of states will allow marriage. For the couples that marry between the ages of 14 and 17 years of age they are twice as likely to divorce as couples who wait until their twenties (Kecskes). Today the average age of first marriage is 27 for women and 29 for men, but fewer than 8% of women and 13% of men married for the first time at the age of 30 or older (Avins) (Pattern 1A). Couples who marry when they are 18, 19, and 20 tend to be blindsided by many problems that take place during marriage such as unemployment, abuse, unexpected pregnancy, in-laws, affairs and many more (Kecskes.) Youthful marriages are a higher risk factor to divorce instead of couples who wait till they are older because of low income, poverty, and cohabitation before marriage. Around two thirds of couples who marry today are already live together and are known to be less committed in marriage (Koontz).