For this paper, I have chosen Topic One, Excerpt from Principles of Criticism by I.A. Richards, to analyze each of the tragic hero from the tragedy stories. In this paper, I will be going over the events and characters that have led to the hero 's fall or demise and then explain how I feel about their situations. I will state my feelings about the protagonist from each story; Prometheus, Oedipus, Hippolytus, and King Lear. What kind of emotion I feel as I read the texts, such as dread, horror, pity, or nothing at all for those main characters. I would say that the protagonist whose situation affected me the most would be King Lear 's, because of how he wanted to do something so simple as giving up his own kingdom and power to his daughters …show more content…
This has caused me to pity King Lear greatly, but also some kind of dread because of how it 's similar to what the decisions we make in the real life that could affect our lives, such as consequences that comes with what we decided. Like for example, gambling irresponsibly that we would then be unable to pay bills causing us to lose everything. Starting with Prometheus Bound text, it 's really fascinating to see that something so ancient could still make us experience those emotions, I don 't necessarily mean it being so old that it shouldn 't affect us, but how the culture and the whole mythology of it are still relatable to today 's society in some ways. We still have "heroes" that help save or improve humanity 's ease of living, like scientists, doctors, or even everyday ordinary people saving those in need. But this is about powerful figures, Prometheus, Zeus, and other gods, so their …show more content…
What happened to Oedipus was definitely not fair to him, this has made me feel bad (pity) for him. He seemed to be a good King, always trying to do good things for the citizens of his kingdom, Thebes. He did one thing that revealed everything which then caused him to lose everything as well, he was even warned not to do that too. There 's some pity coming from me for Oedipus, because the decisions he thought was doing himself and the citizens some good turned out to be terrible. Discovering that the Laius ' murderer was himself and that Jocasta was his own mother. This is what I dreaded greatly when being aware of the prophecy stated in the beginning of the text. Could say that you shouldn 't feel pity for him because he was too stubborn to find the killer even after the warning from Teiresias, the blind prophet, to not do that and also from his wife as well, but I do feel pity for him because he had no idea that he was returning to his own home in Thebes and actually fulfilling the prophecy. So it 's quite understandable why he scratched his own eyes out and exiled from Thebes, it 's probably not the most desirable action to take, but I can feel the horror that he must have felt with the revelations and couldn 't cope with it. It might be similar to what we see on the television, that this is quite common with a lot of
Firstly, Oedipus meant very well, as a ruler. All of the events that were described to unfold under his rule seemed to have the best intentions. Oedipus had no control over the fate of Thebes, nor the fate of Laius.Yet, with all of this grief, Oedipus still listens to the advice from Creon, that was received from Apollo, and chose to look into who murdered Laius to lift the curse off Thebes....
Oedipus can be argued to be a sympathetic ruler of his people, "my heart must bear the strain of sorrow for all." (4). He shows a strong desire to rid the land of its despair. Yet as the reader captures a more in-depth glimpse into Oedipus' soul, we find him to be a jealous, stubborn, "blind", guilty, and sinful man. Oedipus' character outwardly seems to want nothing more than to find the guilty persons involved in the murder of Laius, yet when given obvious clues he turns a blind eye, not wanting to know the truth behind the prophecy.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I am here today to argue the title of tragic hero in the play Antigone by Sophocles. I would like to start off by saying that it will be extremely difficult for me to have the passion that I usually have because of my client. My client's ruthless leadership disgusts me in the worst way. But I will still stand in front of you, the jury, and defend my client. As I said before I am here to argue the title of tragic hero in the play Antigone. I could see that some of you are dazzled by the word "tragic hero". No need to worry for I will enlighten you. The great Aristotle was one of the first men who defined a tragic hero. His definition is not a rule for what tragedy should be, but it is a description of what he believed tragedy was. According to Aristotle a tragic hero must have these qualities to qualify as one. A tragic hero is neither good nor bad. Along with being neutral in his stance, a tragic hero must also be born into royalty. A tragic hero could never be of the common folk. In addition to this a tragic hero must suffer a large fall from good grace. By this he means that a fall that brings him "down to earth". A tragic hero also has some type of flaw. Whether it is a character flaw such as pride and ego or the character must make an error of judgment or a mistake. With the tragic flaw the character must also recognize the flaw that they have made. In other words, they have to be enlightened. The audience is then supposed to feel pity and fear for the tragic hero because of his tumultuous journey. The tragic hero also is supposed to inspire catharsis in the audience.
To identify the tragic hero in Sophocles’ renowned play “Antigone”, we should first consider both the elements present in Greek tragedies and what characteristics define a tragic hero. Aristotle’s definition of tragedy is: “Tragedy is a story taking the hero from happiness to misery because of a fatal flaw or mistake on his part. To be a true tragic hero he must also elicit a strong emotional response of pity and fear from the audience. This is known as catharsis or purging of emotion.” In most cases the tragic hero begins the play with high status, which is often lost in the exodus of the play. For example, in another of Sophocles’ plays, “Oedipus Rex”, in which Oedipus is the undisputed tragic hero, Oedipus begins the play as an illustrious king and ends as a blind beggar. His plight encourages sympathy from the audience because of the curse that had been on him since he was a child.
Oedipus is shown to be a well-liked and trusted king among all his townspeople. Solving the riddle of the Sphinx and saving Thebes brought him great fame and popularity. When time came to save the town from Laios’ killer, Oedipus relied much on his intellect. He searched for information about the night of the murder from Creon and Teiresias, but as he learned more details, Oedipus realized not only that he was the killer but also that he married his mother. Throughout his inquiry he believed he was doing good for his people as well as himself, but eventually it brought him shame. Oedipus was humiliated and disgusted and stated, “…kill me; or hurl me into the sea, away from men’s eyes for ever(p882, 183).'; Oedipus’ wanted to be isolated from the people of Thebes because all his respect and fame was destroyed by his fate.
In conclusion, Oedipus’ denial of justice especially to his eyes, Tiresias, and Creon, show that justice is an important theme in this book. Oedipus denies justice by not giving the full representation of the truth, and by hurting and blaming others for things he himself has done. By doing this, he fails to be the fair king he strives to be by trying to track down Laius’ murderer, and becomes the complete antithesis of what he wants to be. If Oedipus wants to be a just king to his people, then he should take the punishment meant for him—death—because it is fair that since he is the source of the corruption of the land, that he should die in return.
Justice in Oedipus the King & nbsp; After reading Oedipus the King, one may think that in this story, there was no justice, and nobody could avoid their fate. King Laius and Queen Jocasta. fearing the prophecy of the Delphic oracle, had the young Oedipus left on Mount. Cithaeron dies, but the father dies and the son marries the mother anyway. Oedipus, seemingly a good person, also tries to avoid the second prophecy, only to be resurrected. to fulfill the first. But even through all this, I have done some research and feel that there was justice in Oedipus, The King, and their fate wasn't.
In studying different types of heroes this semester, we have come across several examples of heroes and heroines. From the Trojan War to the Italian renaissance, tragic heroes have been consistently present in the stories we have read this semester. In this essay I will expose the similarities and differences between tragic heroes that we have encountered in The Iliad (as recorded by Homer), The Aeneid (by Virgil), Oedipus the King (written by Sophocles), and in The Prince (written by Niccolo Machiavelli).
...s suffering. Royalty, goodness, and flaws are his full persona: no other intense personality traits shine through the shelled example of Oedipus. Well-constructed and complex, he has lasted the tests of time. Tragic heroes are wholly present in all famous literature. From Romeo and Juliet to Oedipus Rex, to Gatsby to Victor Frankenstein to Spiderman, tragic heroes are constantly found throughout human creation. They thrive on the idea that we control little beyond our own actions, which is a topic that humans have related to for millennia. Without these tragedies for humans to relate back to and reassure themselves, media as an entity would not be as popular today. Tragic heroes are morbidly fascinating, relatable, and provoking, lasting through years and connecting to an inner part within the entire human race. All of us have an inner tragedy, a tragic hero or not.
In Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, the reader finds Oedipus as an overzealous king, but one that cares deeply for the people who are under his rule. After solving the mystery of the Sphinx and under the belief that he has escaped the prophecy of killing his father and marrying his mother, Oedipus’ self-confidence goes into over drive. His compassion, for the pain and suffering his people are under, causes him to pronounce a curse on the murderer of Laius. Unknown to the king, he is condemning himself for the crime he committed years ago.
First of all, Oedipus is determined to discover who he is, just like any person who is having problems. One explores the reason behind the problem to set their mind free and feel relief. They try to explore what is causing the problem and when it is discovered it is better left unknown. Oedipus can not accept things as they are and by investigating his past, he is his own worst enemy by destroying his relationships and himself. When he was a young man he heard that his parents were not his real paternal parents, from the oracle. He believed that his adopted parents were his real parents so he moved to Thebes so he would not fulfill what the oracle had predicted as his fate. Oedipus was a character that had a certain way of feeling sure about himself. Many people act this way, but this are the same kind of people that spend their time searching for the truth about themselves. I believe that his pride was his biggest character flaw and because of this, the conclusion of the play was tragic. He feels that he has to take responsibility for his actions even though he had no control over them and fate was to blame. Yet many aspects could have been avoiding with extensive research about his background from his adoptive parents, but because he avoided this, his circumstance determined his fate.
If Oedipus had not been so determined to escape and prevent the prophecy, he would not have fulfilled it. Possibly, he was doomed to fulfill the prophecy because he believed he could avoid it. Nevertheless, his fate was sealed by his actions of pride and determination. His pride of conquering the Sphinx led him to the marriage of Jocasta, his mother. When avenging Jocasta’s previous husband, and his true father, King Laius’ death, he was blinded by his pride to the concept that perhaps he was the murderer. Not knowing the truth, he cursed himself to an “evil death-in-life of misery”. Of course at that time, Oedipus failed to realize his connections to Jocasta and Laius, but recognition of the truth would bring him to his eventual suffrage.
This shows that he is not a purely evil character because he is saving a life and looking after others besides himself. However, running from what he believes is his fate causes him to run into his real fate which leads to his downfall as a leader. On the other hand, it causes Oedipus to take the position as king of Thebes. Being leader of the city, he is forced into
In fact, Oedipus is doomed to kill his father, marry his mother and finally to be blind. It was his destiny or fate; he has nothing to do with this end or to prevent it. It was his fate which was manipulating him; drive him from Cornith to kill his father and then to Thebes to marry his mother. His destiny made him "his wife's son, his mother husband." By the hands of fate, he turned to be the most hated man in Thebes and "the man whose life is hell for others and for himself."
Oedipus had good intentions for his people and tries to save the city when death is at its doorstep even admitting that they mean more to him that is own life “I grieve for these, my people far more that I fear for my own life”(106-106). His determination to seek the truth and care for his people not only makes him an admirable man but respectable king. His quest for truth no matter