preview

Examples Of Mediation And Arbitration

Satisfactory Essays
This essay analysis Alternative Dispute Law and more specific mediation and arbitration sections. Mediation and Arbitration is part of Alternative Dispute resolution. In first part I will try explain the term without prejudice and its legal implications in the case of Unilever plc v The Procter & Gamble Co - [2001] 1 All ER 783. In the judgment of Robert Walker LJ in Unilever plc v The Procter & Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436 was described the most important exceptions to the without prejudice rule. Also there is analysis of mediation principle and received experience of mediation in the ADR lecture. Additionally analyzed Arbitration and more precisely Arbitrators impartiality and independence.

Part A1 (a)
Legal implications and exceptions of ‘without prejudice‘
Without prejudice is legal term and it’s used in common law, criminal or civil law. Term is used usually by party whom wrote a claim and forbids other party from refiling the case and without prejudice most of the time refers to procedural problems. It does not matter whether it’s made in writing or orally, from being put before the court as evidence of admissions against the interest of the party, which made them. The term "without prejudice" is used in the progression of negotiations to resolve the case. It point out that a certain conversation, meting, letter or other communication cannot be presented as evidence in court. This type of negotiation has to be honest effort to settle argument between the parties. Sometimes courts can exclude some communication evidence as without prejudice, which is containing offers of settlement. Primary reason to have communication before the courts is to save the cost of court proceedings. Then the court making decision who will bear...

... middle of paper ...

..., since arbitrator may like one party or other or maybe third party, since arbitrations may come from very different cultural and commercial backgrounds. The parties are allowed in the early stated of arbitration to exclude if very is a doubt of impartiality of arbitrator.
In the present day the status of arbitration has increased. To retain the status working and bearing on impartiality and independence of the arbitrators play a vital role. To challenge the arbitrator impendence or impartiality can be very hard. Party has to be carefully before challenge arbitrator, since the successfully challenge are rare. However if party really have concerns, then the parties should challenge it and not delay since the delay can be disastrous. In context of arbitration tests have to be applied for finding of bias, since prudent arbitrator can disclose connection with parties.
Get Access