Analysis Of Kareem Abdul Jabbar

887 Words2 Pages

Cultural Appropriation: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s Accuracies and Errors In the article “Cornrows and Cultural Appropriation: The Truth About Racial Identity Theft,” Kareem Abdul-Jabbar explores the fundamental differences between appropriation and appreciation of culture. Specifically, Abdul-Jabbar looks at cornrows, a popular hairstyle within the African-American community, as an example of how African-American culture is often popularly rejected until it is deemed socially acceptable by white people. He points out that cornrows have historically been seen as a sign of socioeconomic struggle within the African-American community, and that white celebrities like Lena Dunham have taken the hairstyle and made it into a trend. This immediately diminishes its cultural significance, whether intentionally or otherwise, and hurts the African-American community rather than helping it, as some might He mentions that African-Americans have also committed cultural appropriation by becoming a majority presence in professional sports like football and basketball (Abdul-Jabbar 7). While this may be statistically correct, Abdul-Jabbar’s logic fails because this would imply that football and basketball are inherently exclusive to white culture, and that this is the reason African-Americans did not participate for many years. The reality, in fact, is that African-Americans did not participate on the professional level because they were legally barred from doing so, and neither football nor basketball are exclusive to any single culture. This shift in athletic participation marked a change in cultural integration rather than appropriation on behalf of African-Americans. Despite this failure in Abdul-Jabbar’s argument, I still believe that his wider point about widespread cultural appropriation is

Open Document