Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essays on gene therapy
issues surrounding gene therapy
gene therapy disagremment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essays on gene therapy
In the United States, the basis for ethical protection for human research subjects in clinical research trials are outlined by the Belmont Report developed in the late 1970’s. This document, published by the Nation Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, highlights three important basic principles that are to be considered when any clinical trial will involve human research subjects. They are; respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. (Chadwick & Gunn, 2004) Over 20 years after the proclamation of these specific ethical guidelines, we are introduced to the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Human Gene Therapy’s study on a delivery mechanism for gene therapy that resulted …show more content…
The Gelsinger family was unaware of the resultant death of two test rhesus monkeys receiving the same treatment that Jesse would undergo, and both the family and the governmental agencies were not given notice to the adverse events that had occurred in previous research subjects in the same study. Moreover, investigation into the study has declared that Jesse Gelsinger was ineligible to be a participant, as his liver (into which the gene therapy adenovirus was injected) was not functioning well enough to participate in the first place. The last aspect that was undisclosed was the fact that the individual overseeing the study had a monetary interest in achieving a successful result. Dr. John Wilson, owned a considerable stake in the private corporation that was providing funding. (Stolberg) The lack of the comprehensive disclosure required in obtaining an informed consent had been argued and found to be insufficient, with restrictions placed on Dr. Wilson’s operation and ability to conduct future clinical trials. (Stolberg). We are unable to know if the Gelsinger family would have changed their minds had they been given such information, completely and correctly, but we do know that Jesse Gelsinger was failed by the study investigators in the ability to give the informed consent as outlined by the Respect for Persons …show more content…
(n.d.). The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. Retrieved September 24, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/04/us/penn-settles-suit-on-genetic-test.html?ref=jessegelsinger STOLBERG, S. G. (n.d.). Institute Restricted After Gene Therapy Death. The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/health/052500hth-gene-therapy.html?scp=9&sq=FDA%20jesse%20gelsinger&st=cse STOLBERG, S. G. (n.d.). F.D.A. Officials Fault Penn Team in Gene Therapy Death - New York Times. The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. Retrieved September 21, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/09/us/fda-officials-fault-penn-team-in-gene-therapy-death.html?ref=jessegelsinger STOLBERG, S. G. (n.d.). U.S. Panel Moves to Force Disclosure in Gene Testing - New York Times. The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from
1. Capp, Marshall B. "Ethical and Legal Issues in Research Involving Human Subjects: Do You Want a Piece of Me? -- Kapp 59 (4): 335 -- Journal of Clinical Pathology." BMJ Journals. J Clin Pathol, 18 Jan. 2006. Web. 11 Feb. 2012.
Coleman, C. (2005). The ethics and regulation of research with human subjects. 3–50.50 Code of Federal Regulations, 46(102).
The beginning of Gene Therapy began in the late 1980’s, which was completely unsuccessful. In the fall of 1999 the death of University of Pennsylvania trial participant, Jesse Gelsinger was followed by much public outcry and legal problems that put an immediate halt on all gene therapy research. The reason Jesse was being treated with Gene therapy was to attempt to cure the teenager’s rare liver disease.
... fight the disease. It is crucial that regulation be a necessary component of gene therapy research and applications. In hopes that the government can regulate and can receive this treatment, not restricting it to people that has serious genetic diseases. Gene therapy will change the field of medicine from what it is today. As scientist discovers more genes and their functions, the potential of this treatment is limitless. Though gene therapy is an auspicious treatment choice for numerous diseases (including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and certain viral infections), the procedure remains precarious and is still under study to make sure that it will be safe and effective. Thus government regulators and scientist must take a lead role in adopting a practical approach to address these issues and determining the correct procedures for dealing with them.
In September 14, 1990, an operation, which is called gene therapy, was performed successfully at the National Institutes of Health in the United States. The operation was only a temporary success because many problems have emerged since then. Gene therapy is a remedy that introduces genes to target cells and replaces defective genes in order to cure the diseases which cannot be cured by traditional medicines. Although gene therapy gives someone who is born with a genetic disease or who suffers cancer a permanent chance of being cured, it is high-risk and sometimes unethical because the failure rate is extremely high and issues like how “good” and “bad” uses of gene therapy can be distinguished still haven’t been answered satisfactorily.
Medical research involving human subjects is historically riddled with unethical experiments leading to harmful and even fatal consequences for participants. In order to avoid this in modern medical research, a system of medical ethics has been created. To properly review these standards for experimentation proposals, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) were established in the United States. Although this system of ethics and review processes is tedious and difficult to appeal to, it is fundamental to ensuring the safety of all human participants consenting to medical research. Continuing medical research on human subjects, while conforming to the medical ethics and review processes deemed necessary by the government and the Internal Review
Lopez, Gerald Gabriel. "Gene Therapy: the Scientific vs. the Societal" The Resource. Jan. 1998. 10 Apr. 2001. .
Fischer, Joannie. "Passing on Perfection: Successes, and more cautions for gene therapy." U.S. News & World Report, 10/02/2000, Vol. 129, Issue 13.
Advancements in medical technology can be associated in great part to human experimentation. It is widely known that medicine created for humans, in order to be proven effective, must undergo human clinical trials. When this form of experimentation is voluntary it benefits all of humanity. It just so happens that unfortunately, sometimes volunteers are misinformed of the dangers of the trial or are tested without their knowledge. This world wide issue has been attempted to be remedied through laws and regulations, but loopholes can still be found within them. Time has proved to the world that these laws are simply not enough. Stricter laws should be enacted to prevent the world's history of unethical human experimentation from repeating itself.
It was a treatment for a four-year-old girl named Ashanthi DeSilva, who were born with an adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency, an autosomal recessive disorder that affect the immune system. Her doctors genetically modified her defective immune cells to function as normal ones. Then, they used a virus that also had been genetically modified to remove its harmful genes to deliver the corrected immune cells back to her body. This early success led to many other gene therapy trials in the 1990s for different kinds of genetic diseases, until a tragic setback happened. In September 1999, Jesse Gelsinger became the first person who died after undergone a gene therapy for ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency, a rare metabolic disorder. He died from massive organ failure caused by a bad reaction of his immune system to the virus used in the therapy (Thompson
Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317(3): 141-145
The history of medical research in the twentieth century provides abundant evidence which shows how easy it is to exploit individuals, especially the sick, the weak, and the vulnerable, when the only moral guide for science is a naive utilitarian dedication to the greatest good for the greatest number. Locally administered internal review boards were thought to be a solution to the need for ethical safeguards to protect the human guinea pig. However, with problems surrounding informed consent, the differentiation between experimentation and treatment, and the new advances within medicine, internal review boards were found to be inadequate for the job. This led to the establishment of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission by President Bill Clinton in the hopes of setting clear ethical standards for human research.
Bergeson, E. (1997) The Ethics of Gene Therapy [Online] Available at: http://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~mcclean/plsc431/students/bergeson.htm [Accessed 14 July 2011]
One of the biggest concerns involved in gene therapy in humans is the lack of knowledge and the possibility for consequences later on or i...
Among these technical holdups, research in biotechnology has run into serious problems. In his article titled “Human Gene Therapy: Harsh Lessons, High Hopes”, Larry Thompson, tells of more setbacks the industry has come upon.