Every Man A King Speech Analysis

2574 Words6 Pages

On April 23, 1934, United States Senator Huey P. Long delivered his most well-known speech to the American people via radio. His speech became known as “Every Man A King.” During this time period, the United States had felt the effects of the Great Depression for about five years and looked to the president for a solution to their suffering. Both presidents during this time, President Herbert Hoover and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, had the responsibility of facing the economic depression and leading the United States out from the clutches of the Great Depression. Feeling that he himself would resolve the issues more effectively, the senator committed himself to run for president in 1936, threatening the current president Roosevelt. …show more content…

To begin, a demagogue is a revered public figure that is, “[a] mass leader, charismatic, and heroic,” and has the ability to rally support behind his words. Additionally, the four-stage development of demagogic discourse includes “guilt, victimization, redemption, and salvation.” That being said, Long utilizes the socioeconomic predicament of his audience combined with the ineffectual leadership of the nation to elicit this powerful response from his audience. With regards to the first stage to the demagogic discourse, Long attacks the elite from his opening statement. His claim that the elite will, “not allow us,” to fix the problems facing the people because it would require the government to, “scale down the big fortunes.” In these phrases, he accuses the elite of being greedy, for they would not want divide their wealth, as well as explains that they would place their greed for their fortunes ahead of the well-being of the people. By labeling the elite as selfish, greedy “capitalists,” he blames them for the problems facing the people, hoping to guilt them into contributing to his Share Our Wealth Society. He continues to develop this guilt by explaining that the Mayo brothers, a wealthy family of scientists, donated their fortune to help the sick instead of allowing their fortune to, “lay up on this earth.” He continues to praise them, pronouncing them, “10 times more worthy,” than the other capitalists because they contributed to the solution (turning over the fortunes to help the people). The first and third stages of the demagogic discourse complement each other; the first blames the elite for the problems, and the third offers them a way to rectify their

Open Document