There are many issues a person have to explore in order to create an ideal questionnaire. Firstly, one have to define the aim of the study, which in the same time can provide the basis for the structure of the questionnaire and developing the content to collect the information required to adress the study aims. Once did it, the researcher have to choose the question type and craft good questions. Last, but not least, establishing the right layout. Basing on the appendix attached, I'm going to create an evaluation.
How can a person decide whether a researcher defined the aim well or poorly? The simplest way is to examine the questions asked and how they realate to the subject of this study. Giving an example from the questionnaire attached, firstly the researcher asks some general questions, aiming at collecting basic knowledge about the learner. Some of them are open-ended and others close-ended like ”Are you a man or a woman?”. Open-ended questions surely allow the learner to write their own answers, however, question like “How long did you live there?” could be easily changed into close-ended one using age range; thus less time is spent on answering the question and a researcher himself spends less time on analyzis. I also believe that questions number 7 and 8 are somewhat cancelling each other out giving the fact, that question of age was already asked; therefore one of them would be sufficient enough. The researcher also uses Likert scale to measure the proficiency of the learners and to find out more about the learner's attitude toward learning Dutch. There is no commentary about the way of checking the answers ( questions 17-20), nor a complete explanation of the scale points (questions 17-20); some of them are simply ommi...
... middle of paper ...
...ons, which is too much time. Such questionnaires are exhausting and wearying. The researcher though provide a thank you note at the end of the questionnaire, which is the first and the last positive point given from me in this evaluation of this survey.
In conclusion, the provided questionnaire aims at collecting various types of data using short answers questions (e.g. 6) , Likert scale questions (e.g. 17), fill in questions (e.g. 2) or alternative-answer questions (e.g. 10). Many of them are very demanding and confusing at times for the learner, however the researcher, as I previously mentioned, should collect a sufficient amount of data to analyze the subject of his study if all the questions are answered and answered honestly. Taking all this under consideration, I believe this questionnaire need some adjustments to be qualified as a well designed questionnaire.
Understanding why people do what they do has baffled people for centuries. The Myers-Briggs Personality test has answer a few of these questions. Are you an Extrovert or an Introvert, Sensor or iNtuitive, a Thinker or a Feeler, a Judger or Perceiver? Once you have the tools to understand yourself, you are capable of understanding others. How does your personality complement a coworker, a family member? How can I be more understanding based on my knowledge of how a coworker comes to conclusions about life and their surroundings? Needs work
There are two basic psychometric properties, validity and reliability that have been used to evaluate the quality of scale development. Psychometric testing used to evaluate the quality of instrument (Polit& Beck, 2010).
Dual-process models provide an attempt to describe how a phenomenon of two different mental processes, conscious and unconscious play a role in everyday decision making. The field of psychology has seen the development of numerous amounts of dual-process models over the
The researchers went through the proper channels to get permission to carry out a study using the students who volunteered to participate. The research was conducted using a variety of different survey methods that were chosen to determine the degree and/...
...d for consent to proceed with the study. The participants were given thorough instructions that at any during the survey you can withdrawal your participation in the research, and that this is to benefit research to society. Participation is this survey was voluntary was emphasized. Participants were told that the surveys should take no longer than fifteen minutes and the personal information will remain confidential their results may be shared, but for research purposes only. The questionnaire will have a demographic sheet and a 50 item questionnaire divided into two sections. One part has a four point Likert scale (0= Almost Never, 1=Sometimes, 2= Often, 3 =Almost Always) and the other part is a selection of A or B. It was also reiterated that the participants had the right to withdraw from the research study at any time; there will be no consequences or penalty.
This assessment score surprised me for I feel that I am very tolerant and adapt well to change, but maybe, as I get older, I resistance change because I have found principles and ideas that work well to achieve success and see change as only undermining what is already working (McShane & Von Glinow, 2016, p. 429). McShane & Von Glinow (2016, p. 428) says that “constructive communication” can overcome resistance. This statement is directed at management, but I plan on using this same advice to overcome my own resistance to change from management. Changes are occurring in my department and some role realignment is going to take place, as this occurs, I agree with McShane & Von Glinow (2016, p. 434) that this change will cause me additional stress, of course, now that I know this I can actions to prevent it. An article written by John MacArthur’s says that the Apostle Paul when faced with pressure still reserved “room in his heart to feel the anxiety of other” (MacArthur, 2012), so when thinking of change, instead of just seeing it as something that is stressing me out, I need to realize that others are probably going thought the same emotions and symptomize with them other, for MacArthur also says that, “Anyone who knows and loves Jesus Christ is capable of handling pressure like that” (MacArthur, 2012). I also need to remember that God is in control and no matter what changes occur God will see me through it (Matthew 6:26). By managing change better, will make me a
Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?
From the above test I undertook, it is evident that I incline more to being an extrovert than an introvert. Even though I strongly disagree with the fact that my emotional intelligence is low, as per the results, I think the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test was unbiased and precise. This can be proven from my personality class, which is EFNJ.
In the vast and detailed world of psychology, there are a variety of different tests you can participate in. For example, you can participate in aptitude, verbal or numerical reasoning, and psychometric tests. These tests assess on a variety of different situations such as: behaviors, abilities and intelligence. Personality tests, a common and favored test, measure things such as: behavioral style, opinions, motivators, personal values and career interests. Most often, people complain or disagree with the score of some areas on their personality test; however, there are no right or wrong answers. After completing this personality test and reviewing the results, I found that the overall scoring accurately described me in most areas. The Big Five Personality test scores in five different areas involving openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.
The results are analysed and findings used to deduce a pattern in the collected data. Since surveys are easy to distribute through the internet and emails, they are considered whenever researcher seek knowledge about a specific matter. Unlike both interviews and questionnaires, survey can be distributed to a wide-range of potential respondents, which helps researchers to draw comprehensive conclusions from its findings. Nevertheless, surveys are not ideal for collecting in-depth data on a research topic because they are only designed to gather what majority think of something as opposed to collecting detailed rationale for a phenomenon or
The two questions were designed to provide useful information. The respondents who are female and age between 18-24 or 25-35 contributed to the research. Others were seen as invalid questionnaires. The third section is the most important section of the questionnaire. There were ten closed questions in the third section which follow an easy to hard order, but eight of them were single answer questions whereas the rest two were multiple choice questions.
The interview is a tool that is commonly used to support the questionnaire. In this specific category, the person that is interviewing will have a set of questions that they will pose to each individual and record the subsequent responses. The oral interview carries the benefit of the act of providing clarity to responses, broadening the perspective and giving insight to meanings of trends as a result of specific engagement with certain devices, etc. The interviews are useful in the fact that they provide a means of establishing a follow-up mechanism on the questionnaire that is established and is highly beneficial for a smaller sample of respondents (Cassell, 2006). Because interviews require the presence of personal interaction and face-to-face
Assessment is used as a basis of identifying problems, planning interventions, evaluating and diagnosing clients. Assessment involves identifying statements; actions and procedures to help individuals, groups, couples and families make progress in the counseling environment. Although counselors have the opportunity to limit their scope of practice with respect to modalities, theories, and types of clients, a counselor cannot function without an understanding of the processes and procedures of assessment in counseling. Formal and informal help counselors more accurately assess client issues, create case conceptualizations and select effective empirically proven therapies. The focus of assessments is on gathering information. Thus testing is a way in which counselors construct a measure of psychology through instruments or specified procedures to obtain valid and reliable methods in assessing a client. Counselor uses established scientific procedures, relevant standards and current professional knowledge
Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
In the first step I have prepared a questionnaire containing 100 questions which are selected by researcher taking opinions from various educated persons.