Evaluation of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Company
Probability
Return on Capital Employed - 34%
Gross Profit Margin - 70.91%
Net Profit Margin - 23.8%
Liquidity
Current Ratio or Current Assets Ratio - 1.71
Acid Test - 1.4:1
Efficiency
Debtor Days or Trade Debtor
…show more content…
After completing the formula, I was told that my company had 34%. This is a very good factor of my company because generally, the higher this number is, the better it means your company is doing in this aspect. The advantage of this ratio is that it related profit to the size of the business. The next factor which I evaluated was the gross profit margin of my selected company, which shows the gross profit made on sales turnover. For Johnson and Johnson in the year 2003, this was 70.91%. This is also a very encouraging factor of the company, because a higher profit margin is preferred. This is also the case with the Net Profit Margin, which is 23.8%. This shows that this company is in good control of their overheads. In most aspects, higher profit margins a much better than lower ones, and in almost all aspects, Johnson and Johnson has an extraordinary reporting of profitability.
I then evaluated the liquidity factors of the company. The first factor which I evaluated was the current assets ratio which was reported to be 1.71:1. This is a very good ratio because 1.5-2
…show more content…
I then performed the acid test which is a more severe test of liquidity, but it does not treat stocks as a liquid asset because the stocks of a company are not guaranteed to be sold. A superior ratio to achieve in this factor is a 1:1 rating because it implies that the company has adequate liquid resources. Johnson and Johnson’s ration was a 1.4, which shows that although the company is not perfect in this aspect, few are, and the rating of 1.4 proves to be very satisfactory.
Last, I computed the activity ratios of the company. The Debtor Days of the company was 70.62 days. This is the period of time it will take the company to collect debts on average. This is also a very good reporting of the company’s financial stability because it shows that all of its debts can be collected in less than 2 and a half months. Companies greatly prefer short debt collections period such as 2 months because for a large company such as Johnson and Johnson, a large amount of days could imply the need to improve their credit control. The final ratio which I computed was the Stock Turnover. For this particular company it was 3.39 times. This figure
This requirement makes it important to look through a majority of the return ratios, which include return on sales, return on assets, and return on equity. Additionally, investors are also interested in the ratios related to the company’s earnings, such as earnings per share (EPS) and PE ratio. Looking at return on sales, we can see that Wendy’s has a 7.27% return on sales and Bob Evans has a 1.23%, which demonstrates Wendy’s has a higher profit margin. Moreover, Wendys’ return on assets is 2.85% and Bob Evans is 1.58%. Also, Wendy’s and Bob Evan 's have return on equity ratios of 6.66% and 4.30%, respectively. All of these return ratios show that Wendy’s has a better handle on turning working capital into revenue. On the other hand, although Wendy’s return ratios are higher than Bob Evans, Bob Evans has a better performance on earnings per share and PE ratio. This is due to Bob Evans having less common stock share outstanding, which makes their earnings per share and PE ratio higher than Wendy’s. Due to the EPS being higher for Bob Evans, we would recommend that investors look towards Bob
Analyzing Wal-Mart's annual report provides a positive outlook on Wal-Mart's financial health. Given the specific ratios and its comparison to other companies in the same industry, Wal-Mart is leading and more than likely continue its dominance. Though Wal-Mart did not lead in all numbers, its leadership and strong presence of the market cements the ongoing success. The review of the current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debt ratio, net profit margin ratio, ROI, ROE, and P/E ratio all indicate an upbeat future for the company. The current ratio, which is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, is a measure of how much liabilities a company has compared to its assets. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a current ratio of .90, and as of January 2008 it had a current ratio of .81. The quick ratio, which is defined as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities, is a measure of a company's ability pay short term obligations. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a quick ratio of .25, and as of January 2008 it had a ratio of .21. Both the current ratio and quick ratio are a measure of liquidity. Wal-Mart is not as liquid as its competitors such as Costco or Family Dollar Stores Inc. I believe the reason why Wal-Mart is not too liquid is because they are heavily investing their profits for expansion and growth. Management claims in their financial report that holding their liquid reserves in other currencies have helped Wal-Mart hedge against inflationary pressures of the US dollar. The next ratio to look at is the inventory ratio which is defined as the cost of sales divided by average inventory. In the year of 2007, Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio was 7.68, and as of January 2008 it was 7.96. Wal-Mart has a lot of sales therefore it doesn’t have too much a problem of holding too much inventory. Its competitors have similar ratios though they don’t have as much sales as Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart’s ability to sell at lower prices for same quality, gives them the edge against its competition. As of the year 2007, Wal-Mart had a debt ratio of .58, and as of January 2008, it had a debt ratio of .59. The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by its total assets. Wal-Mart has a lot more assets than it does debt so Wal-Mart is not overleveraged.
The first method we will review is the accounting method. Through this accounting approach we will analyze specific ratios and their possible impact on the company's performance. The specific ratios we will review include the return on total assets, return on equity, gross profit margin, earnings per share, price earnings ratio, debt to assets, debt to equity, accounts receivable turnover, total asset turnover, fixed asset turnover, and average collection period. I will explain each ratio in greater detail, and why I have included it in this analysis, when I give the results of each specific ratio calculation.
Being presented with the problems in the implementation of the SAP ERP system, it is evident that Novartis Pharmaceuticals requires a comprehensive action plan that resolves key issues and the underlying problem. Refer to Exhibit A for a graphical representation of the action plan.
Threat of new entrants is relatively high. Companies forming alliances are potential rivals. Even if earlier such company was not considered to be a threat, after merging with some research and development company or forming alliance with another pharmaceutical company it would become a rival to Eli Lilly. The threat is however weakened by significant research and development costs necessary to successfully enter the business. Eli Lilly’s focus on a relatively narrow market of sedatives and antidepressants weakens the threat of new entrants, but other products that form lesser part of company’s sales such as insulin and others are exposed to high threat of new entrants. The need of obtaining certificates and licenses also weakens the threat of new entrants. Discussed above leads to the conclusion that threat of new entrants is medium.
In regards to the corporation’s balance sheet, it is necessary to place an importance on liquidity ratios to demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations such as accounts payable and notes that have a duration of less than one year. These commonly used liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. All three ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company or business. The current ratio is used to indicate a business’s ability to meet maturing obligations. The quick ratio is used to indicate the company’s ability to pay off debt. Finally the cash ratio is used to measure the amount of capital as well short term counterparts a business has over its current liabilities.
In terms of financial performance both companies have performed well. This brief review will focus on the financial performance such as profitability, solvency and liquidity.
Due to longer life expectancy and the rapid increase of the world’s population, the pharmaceutical industry is becoming increasingly important. The problem of aging population and high healthcare cost is particularly serious in Japan. This essay will focus on a Japanese drug maker – Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Takeda, the company). First, in order to provide background information, the current business model and relevant information of Takeda will be outlined and analysed based on financial data and the company’s annual reports. Second, the essay will examine the most significant challenges that the company has faced over the past five years, including the cause and effect behind this challenges. Finally, the discussion will be looking at the pharmaceutical industry as a whole, exploring the merger and acquisition activities of large pharmaceutical firms in the world, i.e. Big Pharma.
The company was first started, as a distributor of Tiger running shoes from Onitsuka Co. – Japan, Kobe, by a partnership between Bill Bowerman – a respected track and field coach at the University of Oregon - and Phil Knight – a talented middle-distance runner in Bowerman’s track program - in the United States, 1964, and the company was named Blue Ribbon Sports (BRS). The company started by selling the running shoes from the trunk of Knight’s car while Bowerman ripped apart the running shoes, looking for ways to improve it – making it lighter and better. As they both had full-time jobs, there were difficulties in managing the company, thus, they employed Jeff Johnson, the first full-time employee in BRS. Johnson quickly became an invaluable member of company as he marketed the company’s products.
When looking at the financial status of PepsiCo, Inc. and Coca-Cola, every dollar amount in every column has some significance. To find out what these amounts represent a financial comparison of both companies is required. Using financial analysis tools such as vertical analysis, horizontal analysis, and ratio analysis, one can get a clearer picture of the financial status of each company.
Ratio analysis are useful tools when judging the performance of a company by weighing and evaluating the operating performance (Block-Hirt). There are 13 significant ratios that can separate by four main categories, profitability, asset utilization, liquidity and debt utilization ratios. The ratio analysis covered here consists of eight various ratios with at least one from each of these main categories. These ratios were used to compare and contrast the performance of Verizon versus AT& T over the years 2005 and 2006.
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.
PROBLEM STATEMENT Teva Pharmaceuticals, the first multinational pharmaceutical company in Israel, has become a successful global giant in the industry of generic drugs. After experiencing a long period of success and growth in the generic drug industry against some big western pharmaceuticals, the company had acquired many well known pharmaceutical companies and had achieved its goal of $1 billion. theory seemed to be in trouble in building a new strategy and vision to compete with the rapidly growing generic industry. They confronted two big issues as key hurdles in their way.
Organizations use financial statements and ratio analysis assess financial performance viability. The ratio analysis are used to identify trends and to perform organizational comparison (financial) with other companies within same industry. Ratio analysis, using data reported on the financial statements, are divided into five major categories: common size, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, and profitability. This paper will assess the financial stability of John Hopkins Hospital (JHH) using the five ratio analysis.
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.