Evacuation was a Great Success

1393 Words3 Pages

Evacuation was a Great Success

There are many factors, which contribute to whether or not evacuation

was a success. One major factor is the number of lives that were saved

due to evacuation. We now know that if evacuation had not taken place,

a lot more people would have been killed in the Blitz (only were

actually killed). However, we also know that there were cases of abuse

('I had bruises from my neck right down to my ankles on both sides and

on my left hip all my clothes were stuck to my hip where it was

bleeding' John Abbot) and children being used for slave labour etc

because the host families were not checked, and this is obviously a

major failure.

Evacuation was intended to save lives, nothing else. Nevertheless,

there was a lot more to evacuation than intended. For example, the

government did not take into account the social impact evacuation

would have, or the possibility of long-term trauma for some children.

The sources show different experiences and interpretations of

evacuation.

Taken at face value, source B implies that evacuation was a success

because it shows the evacuees in high spirits, as do sources D and H.

We know that the government were responsible for producing sources D

and H, but source B could have been produced by anyone. However, it is

possible that it was taken by the government to use as propaganda to

persuade parents to evacuate their children, as it was not compulsory

for children to be evacuated. Parents were not convinced about

evacuation at the time because they were not given any information

about where their child would be staying, or even whom they would be

staying with. Therefore,...

... middle of paper ...

...umatised for the rest of their lives. Children felt rejected, as

shown in source F, and there was so much stereotyping of evacuees that

the government were issuing propaganda (sources B, D and H) and host

families seemed to be forever complaining about 'dirty evacuees'

(sources A, E and G).

I do not believe that evacuation was neither a success nor a failure,

simply because there were so many different situations that children

found themselves. Many of the problems were caused by a lack of host

families, which is something the government should have looked into

before they started to move children. For example, Wokingham RD was

expecting just over 3000 evacuees, but they received almost 6500,

which would obviously create a shortage of host families. However,

evacuation did save lives, and this was its main intention.

Open Document