Euthanasia is Morally Wrong

2422 Words10 Pages
According to Webster’s Dictionary, Euthanasia is “conceding painless death to a patient who is considered to be hopelessly ill, because of a non-curable disease”. The term is used to refer to the act of deliberately taking the life of a sick person, especially those who are sick from terminal illnesses. Patients in this category are normally those who are nearing their death from a persistent terminal illness and medicine does not to have much effect on them. Different scholars hold different opinions on whether to legalize the practice. Some stage a very strong that attempt to justify euthanasia. They argue that it is a common practice in the US and that it serves to end a person’s suffering and save the family members a lot of emotional and financial burden. However, the cost of doing it outweighs the benefits with aver huge margin. If not well checked, many malpractices will be witnessed in this in the medical centre due to the violation of the legal and medical regulations that controls the practice. Euthanasia can occur either through the physician assisted suicide where a doctor can remove the life support equipment from the patient or give the instructions of the most efficient way of ending their life. Doctors can also withhold treatment or give the patients a lethal injection. Patients can also achieve it through refraining from any form of nourishment and fluids. This way the death occurs faster due to dehydration. In this sense it can it can either be active or passive euthanasia. It is morally wrong to assist a patient in hasten his death. On the contrary you con give them proper care an reduce their suffering in all possible ways, comfort them and be there for them throughout their illness, and this will help them ... ... middle of paper ... ...se to take care of the patient at home. This is much cheaper than admission in hospitals, as well as gives the patient hope of recovery, as opposed to being surrounded by other sick people. Works Cited American Medical Association, AMA End of Life Survey. December 1996. Back A, “physician assisted death” (editorial), journal of the American Medical Association 276 (1996): 1688 , G. J. The wrongfulness of Euthanasia. Belmount, California: Wadsworth, (1979). Lynn, J., Harell, F.E., Cohn F. et, al, For the support investicators, “Defining the ‘Terminally Ill’ Insights from support” Duquesne Law Review 25 (1996): 311-36; V. Mor and D. Kidder, “Cost savings in Hospice: Final results of the National Hospice Study,” Healty Services Research 20 (1985): 407-22. Lynn, J. and Harrold J., Handbook for mortals: New York; Oxford university press, (1999), 113

More about Euthanasia is Morally Wrong

Open Document