Euthanasia: Should Be Illegal in All 50 States
opinionated Essay
1563 words
Today, there is a large debate over the situation and consequences of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the act of ending a human’s life by lethal injection or the stoppage of medication, or medical treatment. It has been denied by most of today’s population and is illegal in the fifty states of the United States. Usually, those who undergo this treatment have a disease or an “unbearable” pain somewhere in the body or the mind. Since there are ways, other than ending life, to stop pain caused by illness or depression, euthanasia is immoral, a disgrace to humanity, according to the Hippocratic Oath, and should be illegal throughout the United States.
Instead of turning to death as an option, patients should realize that there are other ways to stop pain caused by illness or depression. For example, palliative care is available in today’s society. Palliative care is a medical specialty based solely on pain and is very advanced in today’s technology. If the patients that requested euthanasia were to undergo this treatment, they would not feel pain, or as much as they normally would, and the pain would be more tolerable (O’Steen). Also, in most situations, the longing for death or suicidal death, which was revealed to be clinical depression, can be treated by medicine and sympathetic counseling (Bonin).
In the eyes of Christians, euthanasia is immoral, especially to the Schindler family. Their daughter Terry Schiavo was a victim of euthanasia. She had been diagnosed with hypoxic encephalopathy when she was twenty-six years of age. She became a human vegetable, a person who lacks the ability to move or think correctly, and as a result, tubes were used to feed and keep her alive. Her husband filed a case to withdraw the tubes. Terry’s famil...
... middle of paper ...
.... As the Church says, euthanasia goes against the dignity of a living person and is a crime against humanity (“Euthanasia Statement”).
In conclusion, euthanasia is proven to be immortal and should stay illegal throughout the United States. It is the act of killing someone, which is murder, and can result in doctors being sent to jail or severe court cases against others. It can break families apart, one side may want the patient to be euthanized and the other may want the person to stay alive. It would result in fights and leave a scar on the family bond. The patient may have never wanted death, but their guardians decided for them. Their life that they may have wanted to keep was ended merely from another person’s hand. It is their life, not someone else’s; no one should have the power to end their life, not even themselves. That is God’s decision, not a human’s.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is the act of ending a human’s life by lethal injection or the stoppage of medication, or medical treatment. it is illegal in the fifty states of the united states.
- Opines that patients should realize that there are other ways to stop pain caused by illness or depression. palliative care is a medical specialty based solely on pain and is advanced in today's technology.
- Describes how the schindler family's daughter, terry schiavo, was a victim of euthanasia. she was diagnosed with hypoxic encephalopathy, and tubes were used to feed and keep her alive.
- Opines that euthanasia is a disgrace to humanity, since an individual person or group shouldn't decide how, when, and if another person should die.
- Analyzes the hippocratic oath, which directs ethics for practicing medicine and was written in the 4th century b.c.
- Argues that euthanasia is accepted in society, and that humans should be treated the same. animals are not social and do not have emotions, so the previous statement is invalid.
- Explains that euthanasia and murder are not the same and should never be mistaken as each other. a doctor who participates in the study is a murderer.
- Argues that a human should not be pushed into continual misery when he or she feels that life is pointless, humiliating, and the sense of self hood has been destroyed.
- Opines that people who consider euthanasia consider themselves a burden to their families and the people around them.
- Opines that euthanasia is the only option for people who are terminally ill. people die every minute of the day, but they don't have a choice.
- Explains that euthanasia and self-willed suicide are crimes against humanity. the vatican's congregation for the doctrine of the faith says no one can give someone permission to kill an innocent person.
- Concludes that euthanasia is immortal and should stay illegal throughout the us. it is the act of killing someone, which is murder, and can result in fights and leave a scar on the family bond.
Related
- opinionated
- analytical
- Not Permiting Euthanasia the Mercy Killingopinionated essayEuthanasia is an issue that has been in the center of many heated debates for several years. It is prohibited in all fifty states of the United States under homicide laws and in England with a fourteen year imprisonment, but it is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (“Euthanasia and Physician”). Euthanasia comes from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, which means easy death. Today, the definition of euthanasia is the direct killing of a person with a disabi¬lity or terminal illness to relieve them of their sufferings. Very often people will call euthanasia mercy killing mainly because the method is to put a person out of their pain (“Euthanasia”). Euthanasia can be done by either taking actions or not providing what is necessary to keep a person alive and is either carried out through recommendations, a person’s request, family or society burdens, or the scarcity of medical resources (“Euthanasia and Physician”). Because a precious human life is not a burden, we should not interfere with God’s business in life and death, and since the practice of euthanasia can lead to abuse, euthanasia should not be allowed.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is legal in belgium, luxembourg, and the netherlands. it is prohibited in the united states under homicide laws and in england with a fourteen year imprisonment.
- Explains that god created humans on earth with reasons and purposes in mind; therefore, humans should be viewed as important beings with precious lives.
- Opines that humans should not interfere with god's business in life and death, since god is the only one to decide when a person dies, considering he is our creator.
- Explains that euthanasia can be abused and used as murder. it sends out the message it is better for a person to be dead rather than sick or disabled.
- Argues that medical resources are scarce, and euthanasia would free those resources to treat people who want to live.
- Opines that prolonged physical suffering is a natural and unavoidable element in life. it helps people grow in wisdom, character, and love.
- Opines that if dying is not pleasant, people should have the right to shorten it. death is unavoidable, and it is necessary.
- Opines that a person's request for euthanasia does not mean that they have given permission to end their life.
- Argues that euthanasia is a type of assisted suicide, but the argument for both methods is that they do not accept fundamental rights, god’s sovereignty and loving plan, and
- Explains that the catholic church and its official teachings of euthanasia declare that putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons is morally unacceptable.
- Concludes that euthanasia should not be allowed because it defies the worth of human lives with excuses such as medical resource shortages or unaffordable treatments when humans are supposed to be valued.
1365 wordsRead More - Egnisia And Religion: The Views Of Euthanasiaanalytical essayEuthanasia is and will always be one of the leading ethical issues present in the world. There are strong arguments present on both sides of the issue including that of one of the most influential institutions on the planet; the Catholic Church. The Church has, and always will be against the killing of a human being. This applies to euthanasia: “An action or omission which of itself and by intention causes death, with the purpose of eliminating all suffering.” (Pope John Paul II - Evangelium Vitae). The Church also refers to euthanasia as “assisted suicide” and the “mercy killing”. “Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church – 2277).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is one of the leading ethical issues present in the world. the catholic church has, and always will be against the killing of a human being.
- Opines that it is important to distinguish between voluntary euthanasia – as when a person who is mentally competent requests that his or her life be ended — and involuntary
- Explains that the doctor has no reason to reproach himself for failing to help the person in danger.
- Opines that euthanasia remains a criminal act unless carried out by qualified doctors with the consent of legal and ethics experts.
- Explains that the church is against euthanasia because of the sacredness of human life.
- Argues that the catholic church finds euthanasia unacceptable because no one should be able to decide when their lives should end.
- Argues that euthanasia should be legal across the globe and the resources to achieve it must be accessible to all.
- Opines that euthanasia is an excellent financial way to deal with process of death of an individual.
- States that the hippocratic oath () is perhaps the most widely known of greek medical texts.
- Argues that euthanasia should never be acceptable in society and is morally wrong. the catholic church supports their opinion on this dominant ethical issue.
- Explains that they believe that euthanasia should not exist if people accept palliative care and live peacefully without pain. they learned that life is sacred and inviolable.
2210 wordsRead More - Why Euthanasia is not the Solutionopinionated essay“Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit” (“What is Euthanasia” 2). It is accompanied with cases where patients suffering from intractable medical conditions and waiting the death to get rid of their torment and sorrows ask their doctor to put an end to their lives. Also where relatives ask the doctor to accomplish this mission in order to relieve the pain of their patient especially in the case of lastin¬g coma and terminal illness: these cases raised the issue of euthanasia, which has become one of the contentious issues in the world. Euthanasia is illegal in the majority of countries all over the world but “it has been accepted in the Netherlands for over 20 years and a law was passed in 2000 to regulate this and Belgium passed a similar law in 2001and also in the US, one state, Oregon, has had a Physician Assisted Suicide law since 1998” (Henness 3). Moreover, it is very necessary to prohibit mercy killing because it violates human rights and contradicts religions and destroys the patient-doctor relationship.
In this essay, the author
- Explains henness, alan, “why we support assisted dying and voluntary euthanasia.”
- Cites lund, nelson, and yount, lisa. "assisted suicide is death knell to doctor ethics."
- Opines that the sanctity of human life is a basic concept in islam.
- Explains that euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit.
- Opines that putting a taboo against doctors killing patients is reason and wisdom, as it deteriorates the patient-doctor relationship.
- Explains that death and the moment of death is only fixed by our creator and there are many verses in the final holy book "al qur'an" which emphasize these core islamic beliefs.
- Opines that euthanasia should be legalized because of its benefits to the patient and society.
- Concludes that euthanasia is the best way to avoid the big hospital costs especially if the family does not have the sufficient amount of money for the medical care.
1144 wordsRead More - Should Euthanasia Be Legalized In The United States?opinionated essay“Euthanasia” As to whether euthanasia should be legalized or not, has been one of the most controversial topics in the United States of America and throughout the world. Euthanasia in simple terms can be referred to as an easy, painless, intentional killing of an individual in an effort to eliminate that individual’s suffering as a result of terminal illness. It is an accepted practice in very few countries around the world and only in certain states of the United States of America and should not be legalized for many reasons. The most paramount reason why euthanasia should not be legalized is that it can cause premature death. Although many say it should be reserved as a last resort, euthanasia can be chosen by a patient due to depression.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is an easy, painless, intentional killing of an individual in an effort to eliminate that individual’s suffering as a result of terminal illness.
- Opines that euthanasia should not be legalized because it can cause premature death. most suicidal people are not ready to die.
- Opines that euthanasia should not be legalized because it cheapens the value of life. instead of treating and taking care of terminally ill patients, it will cut the cost of managed care.
- Argues that euthanasia shouldn't be legalized because it's not a treatment for pain, and that hospice care should be embraced instead.
- Opines that euthanasia will be abused and likely used in killing terminally ill patients or elderly without their consent for selfish reasons.
- Explains that when euthanasia is legalized, it might not only be used for the terminally ill and the elderly, but also for children and people with disabilities.
- Opines that legalizing euthanasia will erode the purpose of medical research. research in the medical field largely depends on the case study of very rare diseases that people suffer from.
- Opines that if children can be studied, the causes of some of these diseases might be found and a cure could be developed.
- Opines that legalizing euthanasia can also destroy the trust between doctors and patients.
- Opines that the legalization of euthanasia will increase the number of people coming to the united states.
- Opines that euthanasia should not be legalized in the united states or in any other part of the world. we all deserve a right to live no matter the predicament we find ourselves in.
1583 wordsRead More - Euthanasia Research Paperanalytical essayThe term Euthanasia originated from the Greek word for “good death.” It is the act of or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment (ProCon.org, 2013). Euthanasia is a controversial issue that compares one’s quality of life to ethics. Euthanasia can be examined as a form of suicide or a form of being merciful. Even so, does humanity have the right to determine if someone should die or not? Many that are governed by a faithful belief may see Euthanasia as a practice against the will of God. However, others may believe that mankind has the choice over their own lives, and that the belief of God is a theory.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that legalizing euthanasia would allow humans to play the role of god. it is unethical and immoral and should be prohibited internationally.
- Explains that euthanasia originated from the greek word for "good death." it is a controversial issue that compares one's quality of life to ethics.
- Argues that committing the act of euthanasia is acting against the will of god and is sinful.
- Argues that legalizing euthanasia would violate one of the most important medical ethics, which is: ‘a doctor must always bear in mind the obligation of preserving human life from conception.’
- Argues that the slippery slope argument is based on the implication that once a healthcare service, and by extension the government, starts killing its own citizens, the dangerous precedent has been set. legalizing euthanasia could discourage research treatments and possibly prevent cures for people with terminal illnesses.
- Explains that in the united states, euthanasia is banned and physician-assisted suicide is allowed in only five states. europe is relatively more lenient. belgium is one of the european countries that legalized
- Opines that euthanasia should be banned permanently, as it is against many people's morals. it is an act of mercy, and should not be allowed legally.
525 wordsRead More - Research Paper On Euthanasia Inhumaneanalytical essayEuthanasia, also commonly referred to as mercy killing or assisted suicide, is the painless killing of a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition, by a physician. The reason for euthanasia being such an arguable topic is due to society's differing opinions. Some believe that it is humane to put someone out of their misery, while others argue that it is not okay to kill someone under any circumstance. Let's analyse two controverting articles on the matter.
In this essay, the author
- Introduces hannah price to media breakdown, where they deconstruct the coverage of the controversial issue of euthanasia.
- Analyzes how abc news' headline, "euthanasia: terminally ill patient welcomes 'humane' future for victoria's dying," and the hook "jen barnes is dying" encourage the audience to read further.
- Opines that the target audience is the general public, but especially the elderly and terminally ill and their families, as they are the people who are majorly affected by euthanasia.
- Analyzes how uses creative techniques to attract the audience's attention. the tone of the text is casual and most of it is colloquial, everyday language.
- Analyzes how jen barnes' viewpoint on euthanasia is balanced and the opposing opinion of professor mark boughey is heard.
536 wordsRead More - Proponents of euthanasia argue that "mercy-killing" is necessary because patients, particularly those with terminal illness, experience uncontrollable pain(1). They argue that the only way to alleviate the pain is to eliminate the patient. But is there a better way? This essay proves that there is a better way, and this medical opinion is backed up by the best medical opinion available.
In this essay, the author
- Explains louis saeger's "patient controlled analgesia (pca) in caner pain management."
- Argues that euthanasia is necessary because terminally ill patients experience uncontrollable pain, and that there is a better way.
- Explains that euthanasia: moral and pastoral perspectives is a concept developed by dr. saunders.
- Cites matthew conolly, robert truog, charles berde, and the american cancer society in association with the national cancer institute, "questions and answers about pain control."
- Compares chuck michelini's "patients put in control of their pain medication," medical tribune, and gene bylinsky, "new gains in the fight against pain."
- Cites jane m. anderson, david e. weissman, june l. dahl, and john w. beasley, "the caner pain role model program of the wisconsin cancer pain initiative".
1202 wordsRead More - Blah Blah Beopinionated essayA universal truth that has forever been a part of the living experience is the unavoidable fact that all that has lived must also die; it is an inevitable and ultimately unstoppable conclusion. Therefore it is not unusual that humans have always had a fascination with death, whether it is in the mysteries in the hereafter, or the preoccupation with forestalling death (or even in hastening the eventual demise). Consequently, the control of ones’ own death has been a controversial, emotional topic that is continually being hashed out time after time. Bypassing the ethically charged matter of suicide, one moves on to the question of whether ending the life of someone to cease their suffering is wrong. The process of human euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is meant to provide a means for the terminally-ill and those who are suffering unbearably a way to die with dignity and peace; it should be a right considered a universal due when deemed necessary and not a crime punishable with imprisonment. Euthanasia is never a situation or an event that should be taken lightly as no life itself should ever be considered as frivolous or unimportant; that being said, euthanasia should be a viable option for those that truly need it.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that human euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide should be a viable option for those that truly need it.
- Explains the difference between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, which is the person administering the fatal act.
- Explains that euthanasia can come in a variety of five forms and it is imperative to know the distinctions among them.
- Opines that the legalization of euthanasia is a serious matter and should not be thought of in flippant manner.
- Opines that euthanasia should be legalized based on religious and moral percepts. death shall come to everyone; the only things left to be determined are under what conditions and when.
- Argues that euthanization of animals is considered the humane thing to do, but it becomes illegal for people to end their own suffering in a quick, painless death.
- Analyzes how society's view of death is changing with advances in medical advancements, leaving society with an exceedingly aging population that has progressively worse health.
- Explains that there are two procedural types of euthanasia: passive and active.
1796 wordsRead More - Euthanasia: A law meant to be broken?analytical essay“Euthanasia: A law meant to be broken?” “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government .” (Thomas Jefferson.) Advancements in contemporary medical technologies have served to deny individuals the right to die. However, it may be argued euthanasia has emerged with the purpose of reclaiming that right. The expression ‘euthanasia’ derives from the Greek words, ‘eu’ meaning ‘well’ and ‘thanatos’ translating to ‘death. ’
In this essay, the author
- Argues that euthanasia has emerged with the purpose of reclaiming that right. it is defined as killing or permitting death on incurable sick persons in a painless way, for reasons of mercy.
- Explains that hippocrates, an ancient greek physician, opposed euthanasia in the hippocratic oath, which was taken by doctors swearing to ethically practice medicine, in 400 bc.
- Explains that the sixth commandment in the christian bible states: 'thou shalt not kill', implying euthanasia as an act of violence breaching christian faith.
- Argues that buddhism and japanese samurai culture are all in acceptance of euthanasia.
- Explains that while euthanasia is a single concept, it is not murder. religious believers and doctors view it as immoral, but christian believers are taught to love their neighbor as thyself.
- Describes how kelly taylor, a terminally ill 30-year-old female, wants to be released from her condition. she wants her doctors to increase her dose of morphine and let her die.
- Explains that euthanasia statutes are unjust because it causes further pain on the victim and disrupts the soul.
- Concludes that euthanasia is an inherent right, which should not be infringed upon though it is not being legalized.
- Opines that euthanasia should always be a personal choice based on the amount of affliction one adheres to.
1228 wordsRead More - The Morality of Euthanasiaanalytical essayPeople have the right to medical care, but pain and suffering for a person has to be one of the toughest things in life to deal with. In the health care world, few topics create a debate as heated as euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek word meaning good death. Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. Most religious beliefs say that God is the only one that has the right to decide the termination of any life. Euthanasia should be a person’s right of choice legally and ethically. People are faced with choices on a daily basis throughout their lives. Having the choice of euthanasia allows a quick, humane, and painless way to end pain and suffering. Even though a religious belief in God to end life and a person’s right to receive treatment, euthanasia should be a person’s choice because it is quick, humane, painless, and ends pain and suffering. Within the past twenty years there are presently countries or states that allow euthanasia as a means to end pain and suffering as a person’s right of choice. The newest state to add to the chart below is Montana in 2010.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment.
- Argues that religious beliefs are against euthanasia for god's will to make the decision for a person’s final hour.
- States that montana passed a constitutional right for the people of montana to have the right to die with dignity.
- Opines that euthanasia should not be used as a general way of suicide. people should have the right in the united states to end pain and suffering under certain circumstances.
- Explains that a terminally ill person has the right to refuse treatment, food, and fluids to let him or her naturally achieve death.
- Concludes that euthanasia should be a person's choice for two main reasons: it is legal and ethical, and is quick, humane and painless.
- Describes walker, d. (2009, october). regarding the pain of others. first things: a monthly journal of.
1778 wordsRead More