Colonialism In The Eurafrica

1298 Words3 Pages

or much of written history about Europe and its expansion process literature has seemed to always capture the beginning as hostile. There is no argument that Europe has had a plethora of malicious takeovers but the dynamics of colonialism have transitioned to a less aggressive imperialistic influence and have little need to colonialize any longer but to integrate. Starting with the colonization of countries in Africa it is a well-known fact that resistance most often lead to wars. What past literature have failed to analyze and bring forth in knowledge are those lands that not merely welcomed colonization but also had a less defiant attitude towards the movement. Powers such as Ethiopia and Liberia were able to maintain their systems and did not colonize under Europe. Some of the main reasons Europe had major success in gaining political power in most of Africa was due to misinterpreted form of treaties, aggressive militaristic strategy, and greed …show more content…

They explore the methodology behind the ‘project’ of the two continents’ integration processes. In the preface, it mentions how different the text is from separate works of colonialism socially, politically, and economically. Though their work deviates from the traditional sense of writing colonialism, it too only provides a modernist take of the dynamics and not necessarily a shift in fields of scholarship. What makes Hansen and Jonsson’s different is the fact that it’s one of the first its kind to dissect the European Union’s involvement of plans for both the migration of European empires to Africa and vice versa in a transnational aspect. The text respectively covers the grounds as to how Europe transitioned from using aggressive colonial invasion to the effects of integration orchestrated by the EU in the mid-20th

Open Document