Both the arts and the sciences have completely different methods to create knowledge, thus the effects ethical judgments have on the arts and the science are different. Ethics limits the production of knowledge in both the arts and natural sciences, however, in the arts ethical judgments do not limit the methods available in the production of knowledge, rather it limits the propagation of knowledge. On the other hand, ethical judgements do limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in the natural sciences, because ethical judgments are self regulated in the natural sciences by reason because of the role of ethics in the methods.
In order to understand ethical responsibility, it is necessary to understand the meaning of the word “ethics”. Ethics is the study of moral values, or individual and societal convictions that allow a person to distinguish right from wrong (Macrina, 2005). In a more objective sense, ethics can also be described as the analysis of reasoning—the “logic” behind decision-making. Ethical values are the framework of any civilized society, often resulting in common behavioral codes that are accepted across a particular group or culture (Macrina, 2005). In fact, the study of ethics is not restricted to political or social behavior. Applied ethics, or ethics in the workplace, refer to the compliance with principles found in specific fields or occupations. Scientific professions, like other professions, observe certain ethical standards (Macrina, 2005).
Human beings are confronted with numerous issues throughout his or her lifetime that would require him or her to examine the best action to take to avoid the damaging consequences. In most cases, individuals restrain his or her action to take into consideration the consequences that may lead to the right or wrong behavior. One’s ethical and moral standards are first learned at an early age from his or her culture, how he or she is raised, religious background, and social system. Scientifically, there are various ethical theories, such as the virtue theory, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism (Boylan, 2009). By understanding these theories one can compare, contrast and uncover the reasoning behind his or her ethical and moral standards.
Ethics are basically the procedures of personal acts that are based on ideas or a person, about what is ethically good or bad and they are range of statistics that involves these statistics. So basically, ethics are rules a person sets for himself or herself about what is ethically right or wrong. They involve legal issues and if something is illegal, it does not always mean that it is unethical, consequently if something is ethical, it does not mean it is legal.
ethics 1. the principle of morality, including both the science of the good and the nature
Philosophies of the ethical theory are numerous but to begin the study of one particular ethical theory, we must understand what the concept of ethics means. The ethical theory focuses on standards of right and wrong that help determine what why one should do not based on laws, feelings, religion, culture or science, but upon what is the right thing in a given situation (Velasquez et al., 2015). To further this investigation looking at ethics from a Christian worldview Rae (2013) defines ethics as “primarily the task of discerning, or discovering, right and wrong both from God’s word in God’s world” (P. 55). Therefore, discussion and investigation of Aristotle’s ethical theory Virtue Ethics will commence.
“There is nothing outside contingent discourses to which a discourse of values can be grounded—no eternal truths, no universal human experience, no universal human rights, no overriding narrative of human progress. This assumption carries many radical implications. The foundational concepts associated with artistic judgment such as “universal value” and “intrinsic merit,” with science such as “truth” and “objectivity,” and with ethics and law such as “rights” and “freedoms” suddenly have no meaning outside of particular discourse and are deeply involved in the qualities they are alleged to be describing objectively’’ (Faigley 1992, p. 8).
In conclusion, the possession of knowledge indisputably acquires ethical responsibilities despite controversies, human nature alone does not guarantee if a person is going to make use or abuse of the knowledge he/she carries. The obligation of having ethical responsibilities on a man’s shoulder is necessary, because no matter how reliable, virtuous a man is, there are more potential consequences if such ethical demand not being forced as a form of responsibility.
The three fundamental Ways of Knowing: Emotion, Religion, and Faith, are the backbones of where one’s accepted conventions would originate. These influence the ethical judgments that people create and gravitate them equally to both the Natural Sciences and the Arts. Their reasoning for the Natural Sciences usually surpasses more so than in the Arts, due to there trust in the facts and usefulness of any knowledge achieved. Whereas the Arts suffer more bias and discussion as art is more subjective and is based off of each owns opinion as to what can be considered as art. Ethics do technically limit the production of knowledge, even more so today than before.
Studying each area of knowledge without studying the ways of knowing could be considered meaningless, as each area of knowledge can be said to be intricately embedded with countless ways of knowing, all relating to each other in some respect. Thus, it is important to appreciate the ways of knowing that accompany each area of knowledge. Two areas of knowledge which have several associated ways of knowing are art and ethics. Though there are several ways of knowing associated with art as an area of knowledge, emotion, perception and language are the predominant ways of knowing in this area. For ethics, the ways of knowing which stand out the most are perception, rationalism and faith. However, though these areas of knowledge seem to have apparent