preview

Ethical Ethics Of Human Cloning

Powerful Essays
What is cloning? Is it ethical to clone? Should cloning be allowed? Is human cloning the next big thing? First, cloning is a procedure by which an organism is created identical to the original organism and called its clone. Alongside the practice of animal cloning is human cloning; many studies have shown the disadvantages of cloning which I strongly agree with. The controversy over cloning for the most part has been a tremendous theme of whether it is acceptable, that has now raised critical morals discuss about what cloning is. Since the beginning of cloning history, it was never being thoroughly thought out in the concerns of citizens. As experiments continue research into the borderline of science, we inch closer to the probabilities…show more content…
Two, scientists could be creating new inventions; helping with saving money and building new technologies. There is no good possible outcome about this ethical idea of cloning but, yet we do have the negative results of the animal cloning’s that were done since scientist wants to clone human because they've done it to animals before. Which can also be double times harder than animal cloning which such an idea shouldn’t haven’t come to the surface, but it exists in our world. The impact that it will have in our world is more likely to be dangerous and we must be aware of this because it will influence how we live. There's nothing superior that could practically come out of cloning a human being, NOTHING! Yet again, cloning has never been successful and it just a waste of money trying to improve something that will never be more perfect. Many scientists might still argue that cloning will give clarity to disease and how to cure them but that won't be the case if they are nothing like a real human. No other species in the world can be compared to human so why will an artificial organism be compared? There are already over five billion of people living on earth and do scientists think cloning will make it?…show more content…
Clearly, neither the people in the state and the government approve of human cloning, there won't be no federal laws regulating human cloning research. The enacted law of 2002 made it illegal to clone or engage in a human being or human reproductive cloning, and slightly amended the definition of cloning to include the use of “non-human” as well as human egg cells. This change was presumably made to ensure that the law to prohibit cloning for any reproductive purposes (State Law on Human Cloning). If the government can prohibit the act of cloning, then it shouldn’t even be continuing. Clearly, this says a lot about scientists because some still further the act of cloning and disrespect the law of human cloning, and dishonor society's value as a whole; I mean we will love to get the answer for illnesses but not through cloning. If we are to compare a normal human heart from a clone, the CNS (central nervous system) or PNS (peripheral nervous system) to a “non-human” nothing about the clone will be real all that the clone is its physical appearance. Multiples researchers said that a clone will help find for who medicines for cancers and many other questions, wait for who clones or human beings? There might be some good outcome from it in
Get Access