Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative effects participation trophies have on young kids
Negative impacts of participation trophies
Negative impacts of participation trophies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over the years, many sports leagues have given out participation trophies to young athletes. Today, a lot of leagues are no longer giving out trophies to everyone. Leagues should not give out participation trophies because it teaches kids that you don’t need to earn anything, ruins getting an award by not making it a special thing, and teaches young athletes that you will always win. However, some people may argue that leagues should give out participation trophies. In an article by Lisa Hefferman on Today.com, it states “ the idea of giving trophies to only the winners doesn’t emphasize enough of the other values that are important.” (Today.com Aug. 2015) While this may seem true their are many other lessons children can learn from earning a trophy. These lessons may seem important there are many other important lessons children could learn from getting a trophy. In conclusion, young athletes should not get participation trophies. First, it teaches young athletes you need to earn rewards. In the article “Should Young Athletes get Participation Trophies” by A. Pawlowski it states, “If everyone gets a trophy it would not teach kids to earn or strive for something.” ( Today.com Nov. 2013) In another part of this article it …show more content…
L. Hefferman’s article “ In Defense of Participation Trophies: Why they really do teach the right values?” it states “ An award is not really an award if everyone gets it.” (Today.com) In another article by Ashley Merryman called “Losing is Good For You” it says “Awards can be a powerful motivators but nonstop recognition does not inspire children to succeed. Instead, it can cause them to underachieve.” (New York Times Sept. 2013) It is clear, by not giving participation awards it make the children who do get awarded feel more special than if everyone gets one. Obviously, not giving participation awards to everyone gives more of a boost of self-esteem to the people who do get
Our society has shifted its beliefs in how we should treat competition in young people. The question is asked, should all kids get a participation trophy? As it may seem to be an unanswerable question, it honestly isn’t. Thought that the participation trophies may send the message that “coaches” value the kids’ efforts despite their abilities, trophies do not need to be given out. Your words mean just as much when you remind an athlete that you value them in more ways than one. Some may think trophies are a great idea because it shows that everyone’s a “winner.” However, I disagree with that idea. I believe that kids should know that they need to work their hardest in order to be rewarded and understand that not
Priceman states,”They were taught that these awards were placeholders in life. They were records of accomplishment.” It reminds kids of their hard work in a sport. In some cases participation awards are okay, like special needs, and if used correctly, to build a child’s self esteem. But in many cases it does not help children in real life. By giving them too many awards some kids think they cannot live up to the hype, and it brings their self esteem down. While others are the opposite, “When parents regularly overpraised their children’s performances, their children were more likely to be narcissistic two years later”
According to researcher and author of “Top Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing,” Ashley Merryman says “having studied recent increases in narcissism and entitlement among college students, (she) warns that when living rooms are filled with participation trophies, it’s part of a larger cultural message: to succeed, you just have to show up.” She also says “if children know they will automatically get an award, what is the impetus for improvement? Why bother learning problem-solving skills, when there are never obstacles to begin with?” She goes on to say handing out trophies undermines kids’ success: “The benefit of competition isn’t actually winning”. Another author says “when you’re constantly giving a kid a trophy for everything they’re doing, you’re saying, ‘I don’t care about improvement. I don’t care that you’re learning from your mistakes. All we expect is that you’re always a winner’” (Ross). These particiation trophies have many negative effects that can make these children less succesful in competitive enviornments: such as college or in the work force. It will also make them less prepared for an independent life after leaving
A participation trophy can help a child's drive to improve. When a child plays a game and loses, but then watches the other team get a trophy they feel that they suck and won't try to improve. Once they get a participation trophy they make the child feel like they did good and that next time if they get better they will get a bigger trophy for winning and not losing. For instance, “Further, studies also tell us that children who participate in sports get better…”(Huffington 1). This exemplifies that children who participate feel the drive to get better at the sport. When inferring that since they participated they are getting an award if makes them feel like they did good, and then they want to get even better to get a better reward. Thus making the kids get better at the sport showing that participation trophies are beneficial to children, but there are more opportunities to show how they are
Some people may argue that if everyone gets a trophy, everyone will be happy. That might be an understandable concern, however, according to people on blog.sportssignup.com, “By acknowledging everyone with the same award we’re actually celebrating no one and even undermining the efforts of those who really deserve to be recognized.” Similarly, it makes the kids who work really hard feel like there efforts were equal or worse than the efforts of those who do not try hard and do not work hard. On the other hand, if everyone gets a trophy than winners are no longer special. Kids should play sports because they enjoy playing them, not because they want a trophy. It is like one of those arcade games at the movie theater, you keep playing until you win. Another way to say this is, sports were made because they wanted to let people have fun and try to compete, but now sports is turning into the concept of everyone is a winner. Kids and adults feel like we are ruining what sports are supposed to be. In summary, many citizens think that kids should not get trophies for participation because only kids who work hard deserve
The maxim “trying is the important thing” will only lead to laziness and complacency in life. Trying is very important in being successful, but there are many more important things that are necessary for success. Parents try to boost their children’s self-esteem and make their children happy by giving them participation medals, but this is actually counter-productive. Larger and larger amounts of medals and trophies are given for increasingly smaller achievements, and this “everybody’s a winner” mentality can make children grow up to expect success and recognition for a mediocre performance. Children may be led to underachieve and not try their best, which may lead to idleness and lack of achievement in the truly competitive environment of
Research shows that children who receive ongoing praise aren’t inspired to succeed, instead, it causes athletes to give up. Participation trophies should not be used because failing motivates athletes to keep trying, kids feel cheated when they aren’t known for their accomplishments, and participation trophies don’t help kids improve. Some think participation trophies help motivate young athletes. Although this is true, failing and not receiving an award motivates kids to keep trying so they can get rewarded for individual accomplishments.
Most kids playing sports get lots of trophies. But do those trophies mean something or are they just for playing the sport? Most participation trophies are given out to the losing teams for just playing the sports, they don't even have to try. How does this affect the rest of their lives? Do these trophies ruin the thrill of winning?
Although some people my argue that participation awards are a good thing to receive, it is evident that participation awards influence you to not try and to just give up on the sport. First of all, participation trophies can make you think you are entitled to something just because you showed up and it can lower your self esteem. According to the article against participation awards, it describes the awards to "reward the parents for signing their kid up" instead of "the childs effort and attendance." For example, the minute the child's name is written down on the paper, they will receive an award even if they don't attend any of the events. Another example, is that you get first place
Weak-mindedness, a great struggle for our generation, is one of the leading causes of stupidity. The weak-minded fools of our generation are the ones who will someday be in charge of things in this country. From an extremist view, participation trophies could quite possibly be the downfall of the entire country. We are being set up to
Ultimately, children need to learn what it takes in order to truly be awarded a trophy. Awards are not to just be handed out to each person who participates, but to the ones who have accomplished a victory. Every person loses at times and it is normal, but by teaching children what losing is, it could help them further in life. Little league is meant for children to learn how to play a sport and to have fun, but that does not mean that trophies need to be handed out for participation. Anything worth having in life comes with hard work and educating children of this at a young age will benefit them. A child does not deserve a participation trophy because it does not allow proper effort to be shown, each sport is played to win, and because a child deserves constructive criticism.
Children, when they don’t get a reward, it often lowers their self-esteem. Kids who don’t get participation trophies at all are found to understand why they don’t get awards for effort and are more happy and proud of themselves when they do get an actual trophy, knowing it’s for their performance. A child once said to author of ‘Playing to Win: Raising Children in a Competitive Culture’, Hilary Levey Friedman, “Well, I purposely played in this easier one because I knew I would win and now I don’t really count that as a real victory because I knew I went in and it was below my level.” (Source #1) This proves that children do understand that trophies, given when unrequired, aren’t for them doing good.
On the other side of the debate, some might argue that it does not teach hard work because if the kids are getting burned out of the sport they will not try to work hard. If the kids are in these sports programs it must mean that they are having fun and they want to work hard and get better. Nathan Pitcock NY Times Upfront, stated, “In the soccer club I work for, I've seen countless kids achieve their potential as a result of all their hard work. It's the intensity that makes youth sports so valuable.” Pitcock states. These kids on this soccer team reached their full potential from working as hard as they could. Firstly, Daron Bryden, a 6th grade phenoms father, noted, "This is Daron's dream to be a Div 1 quarterback and play in the NFL and he works extremely hard at it, while maintaining good grades and being a great kid and big brother, so my wife and I will do whatever we can to help him reach his dream."Darons father states. This is the kind of kid that could make it to the NFL he works very hard to achieve the goal that he has, and I almost guarantee that he is involved in intense sports, because that's the only way that you will be great. Lastly in the article “Inside the craze culture of kids sports.” Andrew Ferguson, writes, “Now the goal might be a scholarship to defray the stratospheric costs of college, or at least a record of athletic accomplishment that could provide the edge in gaining admission.”
Todays generation of kids have been crafted to expect praise for everyday tasks and have become entitled all because of something many people thought was harmless, participation trophies. If you ask anyone, they have probably recieved a participation trophy at least once in their life and some will think it was a good thing, but others may beg to differ. In my opinion participation trophies are a bad tool in life because it goes along and is a big part of the we are all winners concept. Trophies should be a symbol of accomplishing something not a symbol of participation in an activity and a few people have written about their opinion about this situation varying from critical writers, to college athletes from around the country here are
Many life lessons can be taught through sports. Children can learn the importance of work ethic, working with others, perseverance, and the list goes on. There are studies that have shown that kids who are involved in athletics are more successful in the business world. It is only when parents turn the sporting events into an ultra-competitive requirement for their child that it can become detrimental. The lessons that sports teach kids about real life is one of the greatest benefits that can be gained from sports. Because so much can be learned through sports we need to make sure that we put focus on teaching lessons through sports rather than making it all about winning. It is a sad when parents turn a great beneficial thing into something that can be harmful for their children.