Essay On The Hawthorne Studies

836 Words2 Pages

A Comprehensive Analysis into the Hawthorne Studies This essay will analyse the publication “Hawthorne, the myth of the docile worker, and class bias in psychology”, an article by Bramel and Friend (1981). It will subsequently go on to further critique six more academic articles that either support or disagree with the primary publication and demonstrate how the Hawthorne studies have influenced my perception on contemporary management functions and the employer-employee relationship. The Hawthorne studies conducted at the Western Electric Company Works has attracted considerable amounts of critical scrutiny as it has been interpreted in both supportive and contradictory ways. Dugald Jackson, head Electrical Engineering from MIT conducted a series of experiments included in the Hawthorne Studies named the ‘Illumination Experiments’, altering light intensity to examine its effect on worker productivity. In 1927 a research team from Harvard was invited to assist after the tests resulted in unanticipated data. These studies showed both psychological and social factors are responsible for workers’ overall productivity and job satisfaction. Many psychologists and critics attack the research procedures and criticise the analyses of the data and conclusions. Bramel and Friend are an excellent example of critics who consider these studies to be undeserving of receiving acknowledgement and recognition. The article ‘Shining New Light on the Hawthorne Illumination Experiments’ authored by Izawa, French and Hedge (2011) also supports Bramel and Friend’s conclusions. They continue to explain how “Previous accounts of the illumination experiments are fraught with inconsistencies because they have been based on secondary sources”, (Izawa et al.,... ... middle of paper ... ...nce for a particular style of supervision. Dutton (1971) continues on to conclude that the lasting significance of this body of research and the theories around it exist only in its simple ability to place financial incentives into a social context. To conclude, the analysation of the Hawthorne studies and the six texts that either support or disagree with it has changed my perception of contemporary management functions and the employer-employee relationship and how this relates to the Hawthorne studies. The critics and supporters of the theory have equally valid points; “Fraught with inconsistencies…” (Izawa et al., 2011). And “Improved performance…” (Sonnenfeld, 2001). My Opinion is that the Hawthorne Experiments helped shape contemporary management and has effectively established the importance of a socially working environment with relation to productivity.

Open Document