Essay On The Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

“The Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added (US Constitution, Preamble).”After the leaders of the United States wrote the Constitution, they had to get all thirteen states to agree to it. Some states didn 't want to agree unless they could add some specific rights for individual people. So in 1791 the United States added ten new rights to the Constitution. They were known as the Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The document 's purpose was to spell out the rights of the people that the government

One of the many disagreements between federalists and Anti-Federalists were the constitutions lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power (“Bill of Rights – Bill of Rights Institute”). The Federalists were those who supported the Constitution and thought that there should be a new Union created by a strong centralized government and individual local governments. They felt that the bill of rights was unnecessary because it was implied with the rights that the Constitution did not specifically say would be kept by the government. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists were opposed to such a form of government since the Constitution lacked clarity with the protection of the people. The Anti-Federalists wanted certain rights and guarantees that were to be a part of the constitution (Scholastic News: Constitution Day). A clear depiction of the Anti-Federalists attitude was shown by a series of essays, the “Centinal Essays,” which “assailed the sweeping power of the central government, the usurpation of state sovereignty, and the absence of a bill of rights guaranteeing individual liberties such as freedom of speech or freedom of religion (The Constitution of the United States: A History)”. Eventually, the Bill of Rights had been adopted to settle down the

The freedom of religion is a guarantee that the government will not establish and or endorse any national religion. It cannot treat any citizen or group in a biased way based exclusively on their religious preferences or beliefs. The freedom of speech is the right for citizens to speak his or her mind on any subject and in any point of view without punishment as long as it does not harm anyone. Also, the freedom of press lets individuals ' print whatever ideas, thoughts or information they like, as long as it does no harm to others. Similar to the other freedoms, the right to peaceably assemble falls into place with the theme of the right to express yourself as you see fit. This leads to the right to petition the government, whereas the people have the right to tell the government to change the way it is being run if they have a problem with it. It is clear that all of these rights are closely entangled and that the feed directly off of one another. Therefore the people have the overall right to express themselves freely in any form and about any topic with regards to the welfare of others around them. At the end of the day, the