Essay On Style Approach

1768 Words4 Pages

Style Approach
Definition
• Leadership is comprised of two types of behaviors: task behaviors and relationship behaviors
• The aim of this approach is to clarify how leaders balance these two behaviors in order to lead
• Offers a framework for examining leadership in broad terms
• Emphases on what leaders do and how they act
• Incorporates the actions of leaders towards underlings
• The Ohio State studies researched how leaders acted when leading a group
• The Blake and Mouton Leadership grid studies how leaders help an organization through concern for production and/or concern for people and is based on a nine point scale
• Five Leadership Grid styles: authority-compliance, country club management, impoverished management, middle of the road management, and team management.
Strengths
• Broadened the scope of research to include behaviors of leaders
• Varied research validates this approach
• Stressed a leaders’ style consists of task and relationship behaviors
• This approach is empirical and provides a broad view of understanding leaders Criticisms
• Does not show a correlation between leadership styles and performance outcomes
• Unable to locate one style that works for every situation
• Implies the ideal leadership style is high task and high relationship when in reality every situation is different.
(Northouse, 2013)
Based on Blake and Mouton’s Leadership Grid, Betsy has an Authority-Compliance or 9, 1 style of leadership (Northouse, 2013). She maintains a strong position on accomplishing the task and less on her relationships with her subordinates. When she communicates, she often gives directives or instruction. Some of the other employees view her as controlling and demanding.
Marianne has a Maternalism style of lead...

... middle of paper ...

... lead others and made the decision to promote up the ranks. Now as a supervisor and manager, I lead and serve the public, my superiors, and my subordinates. I have found that by putting the needs of my subordinates first, they generally work harder for me to accomplish the goals and objectives of our organization. I have observed other leaders achieve similar results by leading the same way through servant leadership. Conversely, I have seen self-serving leaders utilize transactional leadership and ultimately fail to achieve as much because their subordinates are not motivated enough and have no desire to follow them. In my profession, I often hear the expression, This type of compliment is normally reserved for those servant leaders who listen, show empathy for their followers, and inspire them to achieve the stated mission of the organization.

Open Document