Essay On Sociological Theorising
argumentative Essay
737 words
compare and contrast the three man schools of sociological theorising with reference to key theorists Introduction 200 Body 1 365
Historically, the two foremost scholars on social stratification are Marx and weber –although their perspectives overlap they carry a number of important differences
INTRODUCTION
Sociology is described as “looking at the world a particular way” (Matthewman & West-Newman, 2013) When opening your mind to this, it is then easier to discover the reasons why we do certain things and why things are the way that they are. There are three main schools of sociological theorising, which are conflict theory (creating a social hierachy), Micro Interactionism (studying social interactions), and Functionalism (how social events contribute to social order). These ideas are defined by sociologists Karl Marx, Max Weber, Durkheim, Irving Goffman, and ---- in an effort to reveal the inner functioning’s of the world.
CONFLICT THEORY
Conflict theory is recognized as the inequalities within capitalist society. Having resources such as money, power, material items and certain social relationships can improve an individual’s chance of excelling in society and determines where they are placed in the social hierarchy. By holding a relatively high position in the social hierarchy, it becomes much easier to move progress upwards. An individual’s position within the hierarchy was originally defined by Karl Marx.
Marx’s theory
Karl Marx wrote his theory through the Algreian to industrial revolution period; he identified four classes in society, the bourgeoisie, the petite bourgeoisie, and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was seen as the capitalist class who were much more privileged and an elite member of society, they were of...
... middle of paper ...
...e of how others could perceive us, and modify our behaviour accordingly. we can only ever imagine what others think of us , even if they tell us how they feel. The I and the ME
Goffman
‘social self feeling’
Mead believes that we have two parts to our life the I- the internal part of ourselfves and the Me- the me is created by ?
We learn to understand how other people see us the me and respond to that with our I
Critique – micro internationalism
Example
Mead when individuals(kids) engage in games they start to see the roles of themselves and roles of others,
how individuals act
3. Garland and Durkheim functionalism
Garland
Durkheim
FUNCTIONALISIM
CONclusion
References:
1 being sociological
2 sociology for dummies
3 an introduction to health
How do the all intertwine?
References
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118269237.ch8/summary
In this essay, the author
- Explains the three main schools of sociological theorising, which are conflict theory, micro interactionism, and functionalism.
- Explains that conflict theory is recognized as the inequalities within capitalist society. having resources such as money, power, material items and certain social relationships improves an individual's chance of excelling in society and determines where they are placed in the social hierarchy.
- Explains that max weber, a social theorist, agreed that economics was important on one's position in the social hierarchy, but extended his ideas to other social factors such as interests, political views and wealth.
- Criticizes the theory of functionalism, which downplays society's unifying future. power used to be legal now its economic
- Explains that charles cooley created the concept of ‘the looking glass self’ where we act based on an image of how others could perceive us, and modify our behaviour accordingly.
- Explains that when individuals engage in games they start to see the roles of themselves and others.
- Compares the three man schools of sociological theorising with key theorists. the two foremost scholars on social stratification are marx and weber.
- Analyzes karl marx's theory of the bourgeoisie, petite, and proletariat in the algreian to industrial revolution period.
- Describes micro sociology as a theoretical perspective that looks at human interactions, behaviours, and roles to understand society and its inner workings.
- Explains that mead believes that we have two parts to our life the i- the internal part of ourselfves and the me-the me is created by. we learn to understand how others see us the me and respond to that with our i.
Related
- explanatory
- analytical
- comparative
- Sociology Essayexplanatory essaySociology is distinguished by the study of sociology theories, which play a significant key role in enabling us to analyze different societies. Sociology theories give us different outlooks different perspectives within factors of different societies that can be analyzed. This will make it easier for someone to understand and predict social behavior and happenings within societies that offer great importance to our generation. This author will focus on sociologist concepts that are related to the videos for our assignments and factors that have been put into consideration including: aging, discrimination and social theories with an increase in the size of the older population in relation to the younger generation. These videos in relating to aging, discrimination and social satisfaction I am going to analyze the findings that were a result in which will give an analytical detail of aging.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that sociology is distinguished by the study of socioology theories, which play a significant key role in enabling us to analyze different societies.
- Analyzes how the video of facing aging is an example of what our older population can offer society based on past experiences and their way of thinking.
- Explains that social lamination refers to the process of arranging societies into groups. adults are seen on three-wheeled bicycles and interact with each other through sports.
- Explains that discrimination refers to an unjustified treatment of others based on a variety of factors like age, race and gender. aging is among the main topics that are discussed in one of the videos.
- Explains the functionalist perspective theory that society comprises of a system of inner-connected parts that work together. collaboration among people within this society is important for ensuring that people can learn from one another.
- Explains that they relate to this theory because they are required to collaborate with their spouse or coworkers when working on certain things where they will need assistance.
- Explains that critical theories are characterized by critiquing different aspects from society. some people have tried to critique their beliefs that older workers are not able to deliver when compared to younger adults.
- Explains that by doing this concept, they relate into their life, in a big way that people may sometimes try to discourage them from doing things that they believe and realize for themselves.
- Explains that conflict perspective is a socially viewed theory of people competing for power. it's characterized by certain structures that vary from one society to the next three disarray inequalities.
- Explains that sociology is exemplified by the study of a society or societies. it's shaped by tradition and rules that govern individuals in their daily transactions and interactions.
704 wordsRead More - Interactionism And The Sociological Perspective Of The Worldexplanatory essayWhen people view their world and society, they use their own individual worldview, which significantly impacts whether they have a negative or positive outlook on the world around them. In sociology, this worldview becomes evident as the person applies one of the three sociological perspectives in examining society. These three sociological perspectives (structural functionalism, the conflict theory, and symbolic interactionalism) are distinct from each other and seek to describe society as it truly exists by means of interactions and structure.
In this essay, the author
- Explains how sociological perspectives (structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionalism) are distinct from each other and seek to describe society as it exists through interactions and structure.
- Explains structural functionalism as a framework for building theory that sees society as complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.
- Explains the conflict theory, popularized by karl marx in the mid-19th century, which focuses on the oppression of the individual by dominating forces.
- Explains the symbolic interactionalism theory, which examines society as a complex collection of relationships and beliefs among people.
- Explains that symbolic interaction theory analyzes society by addressing the subjective meanings that people impose on objects, events, and behaviors.
- Explains that roles are set of expected behaviors in a social situation, and if disrupted, they can cause social tension. this perspective places an immense amount of value on the self.
- Explains that they hold the structural functionalism perspective. they believe that each person in society has a certain task to keep society functioning.
- Concludes that the structural functionalism perspective provides the best and most accurate representation of society's structure. conflict does not create progress and unity, but rather chaos and separation.
956 wordsRead More - The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engelsanalytical essayThe first section, Bourgeoisie and Proletarians, focuses on the struggle between the classes created in society. Marx refers back to the Middle Ages to show how complicated the class system was. “In the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs…”(1) all made up different stratas of society. With all of these groups of different trades and economic stability, oppression was bound to happen. Society did not contain many groups and classes as in the middle ages. Society was formed from two basic groups, the Bourgeoisie and Proletarians. The bourgeoisie was a class constructed of people who owned property. These people were the wealthier half of society. The proletarians were those of the lowest class of society. Marx discusses how the bourgeoisie came to be such a strong member of society. This happened through the occurrence of the Industrial Revolution. New machinery changed all of industrial production. With these new advances, Marx describes that the middle class was destroyed and industrial millionaires resu...
In this essay, the author
- Explains the communist manifesto, written by karl marx and friedrich engels, outlines how a society should be run under communism.
- Analyzes how marx refers back to the middle ages to show how complicated the class system was. the bourgeoisie was a class constructed of people who owned property.
- Analyzes how marx's second section, proletarians and communists, describes the communists' role in relation to the proletariat, stating that communism wants to abolish private property from the bourgeoisie.
- Analyzes how marx's third section, socialists and communist literature, discusses different types of proletarians from different geographical locations and their attempts to overthrow the bourgeoisie.
960 wordsRead More - Karl Marx's Social Conflict Theoryanalytical essayIn sociology, there are a few main sociological perspectives. These are the grand theories that sociologists generally base their studies off of and these theories shape how they understand and analyze the elements of a society. One of the most well known and developed sociological theories is the social conflict theory. This theory concentrates heavily on how society is held together by coercion, how individuals are subordinate to society, and how society is a constant competition for power between groups. It is a theory that is more critical, pointing out the negative attributes of society, focusing on the struggles and conflicts between groups in society. Many sociologists have been proponents of this theory, but the most well known, and
In this essay, the author
- Explains that social conflict theory is one of the most well-known sociological theories, focusing on how society is held together by coercion, how individuals are subordinate to society, and how it is a constant competition for power.
- Explains that the social conflict theory is a macrosociological perspective that views society objectively, but also more negatively.
- Explains that capitalism is a key concept in the social conflict theory because the struggle for power between the many lower class individuals and the few powerful capitalists has always been an ongoing strife within society.
- Explains how karl marx, the founder of the social conflict theory, explained the same social phenomena in day and age: the bourgeoisie consisted of a few extremely powerful industrial owners who owned the large factories.
- Explains that social conflict also includes stratification and inequality, which revolve around conflict for power or over scarce resources between two groups. the conflict between minority race actors and hollywood is caused by the scarcity of job opportunity.
- Explains that the theory of social conflict recognizes that an individual is completely enslaved to authority. a father working a minimum wage job is entirely controlled and confined by his job.
- Analyzes the social conflict theory, which shows how individuals are shaped and controlled by coercion, and how society is a constant cycle of disagreement between groups.
- Explains that karl marx, a famous sociologist, philosopher, theorist, and political activist, was born in germany in 1818.
- Explains that marx believed there were many problems with capitalism, and related capitalism with the conflict theory in many writings.
- Analyzes how marx viewed society as a two-class system, consisting of the proletariat and the bourgeoise, which led to communism and ended the class struggle.
1343 wordsRead More - The Decline of Aristocracy in The Communist Manifestoanalytical essayThe decline of aristocracy in The Communist Manifesto began with Karl Marx’s statement, “The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggles.”1 Marx recognized the ideals of the social rank, which has influenced every society throughout history. The two social classes described by Marx were the Bourgeoisie, or the upper class, and the Proletariats, or the lower class. Before the Bourgeoisie came to social power, landowners and corporate organizations ran the society. Marx believed that the severe separation of the two classes greatly troubled society and that the two classes must coexist as one with each other.2
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the decline of aristocracy in the communist manifesto. marx recognized the ideals of the social rank, which has influenced every society throughout history.
- Explains that the bourgeoisie were the landowners, employers, and those who received capital in the society. they controlled labor to increase personal capital.
- Explains that the proletariat was composed of the lower class of individuals as well as the upper region of middle class. the working class was exploited by their superiors for all facets of their income.
- Analyzes how marx described the class relationships as social exploitation rather than an object of the labor market. he believed that the bourgeoisie would eventually lose its power to the working class.
- Explains that marx wished to emancipate the proletariat and develop a class-consciousness, which respects the lower class.
- Argues that marx argued that the revolution of classes was inevitable and that capitalism must be brought to an end for the advancement of the proletariat.
- Explains that marx explained that the only class, which could uphold and maintain a revolution, was the proletariat class. they had the desire to preserve their existence more than the bourgeoisie.
- Analyzes how marx concluded his essay on communism by stating that social classes are far more than just amongst nations, and they are very different between them.
- Explains marx, karl, and engels' manifesto of the communist party. smith, j.n., classicnotes by gradesaver. lukacs, george.
- Cites smith, j.n., classicnotes by gradesaver, lukacs, george, and hoselitz, ben f.
968 wordsRead More - Illegal Immigrationcomparative essayKarl Marx is the founder of conflict theory. He saw the horrors and the exploitation that the peasant workers had to go through during the Industrial Revolution. He was so distressed by this that he began to observe and study society. According to his observations, there were two types of classes in the industr...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many people illegally travel to another place because they are desperately looking for better opportunities, running away from famine, wars or violence. the united states, being one of the most prosperous countries, attracts many of them.
- Explains that marx saw the horrors and exploitation of peasant workers during the industrial revolution and began to observe and study society.
- Explains that conflict theorists focus on the social pulling and pushing factors that cause mexicans into the united states.
- Concludes that the real reason for the construction of the fences is political. politicians want to make it seem that they are taking charge on the issue of stopping illegal immigrants from entering the country.
- Cites http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/systems/mexico-wall.htm and https://blogs.buzzle.com/reasons-for-illegal-immigration.html.
908 wordsRead More - Looking at the World Sociologicallyanalytical essayTo look at the world sociologically, one must first understand the definition of sociology. Sociologists, according to Peter L. Berger are people who are “intensively, endlessly, and shamelessly interested in the doings of men.” They study people in their natural habitat, which is wherever people gather. So in order to look at the world from this perspective, one should “think systematically about how many things we experience as personal problems are really social issues that are widely shared by others born in a similar time and social location as us.” (Pearson Custom Sociology, 5) This is known as the “sociological imagination”, first coined by C. Wright Mills. In The Promise, Mills describes how there is a connection between our problems and those of the social world. In order to understand these connections however, one must look at the different aspects that make up the social world and how they affect us. The various themes to understand when looking at the world sociologically are social structure, race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality, and social interaction.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that sociologists study people in their natural habitat, which is where people gather. this is known as the "sociological imagination", coined by c. wright mills.
- Explains that social structures are everywhere and basically make up how our society functions. there are many positives and negatives to observe when discussing social structure.
- Explains that race and ethnicity are terms used everyday in our society, but sociology says there is no such simple grouping of people. labels like black and white can have a negative connotation attached to them.
- Analyzes how eduardo bonilla-silva explains "color-blind" racism, which gives the whites a false notion of racial equality. the mass media portrays minorities in negative and stereotypical roles.
- Explains that gender and sexuality are related and linked because of cultural beliefs about how an individual should act in public based on their gender.
- Explains that gender begins with the assignment to a sex category on the basis of what the genitalia looks like at birth. social construction refers to the entire system of social processes that create and sustain gender differences and gender inequality.
- Explains that society believes that men and women are different and often have a preconception against same-sex relationships.
- Analyzes how social interaction has an effect on how individuals see the world around them. conforming can cause conflict and individuals or groups are labeled.
- Concludes that we as individuals need to look at the world sociologically. everyday we are confronted with conflicts and injustices. social interaction gives us tools to understand our personal self in relation to others.
1507 wordsRead More - Marx And Marx's History Of Class Conflict In Societyanalytical essayFor Marx, the society history of class was a history of class conflict. He observed the successful rise of the bourgeoisie, and the essential of revolutionary violence. He says that the heightened form of class conflict securing the bourgeoisie rights that supported the capitalist economy. Marx believed that the poverty inherent in capitalism were a pre-existing form of class conflict. He assumed those wage laborers are in need to revolt to bring about a more equitable distribution of wealth and political power.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how marx observed the successful rise of the bourgeoisie and the essential of revolutionary violence. marx believed that the poverty inherent in capitalism were a pre-existing form of class conflict.
- Explains that race is an important feature that stands to influence class conflict. as a result of conquest or internal ethnic differentiation, ruling classes are often racially homogenous.
- Analyzes how spivak's expansion of particular ethnic group with the definition for the term subaltern includes class based definition which subjected to manipulate the status of women.
- Analyzes how spivak extends the reach of the term [subaltern] by using it to figure social group ‘further down’ the social scale and consequently less visible to colonial and third world national-bourgeois historiography alike.
- Explains gramsci's view that the inevitable proletarian revolution leads to the consequence of the economic division of labor between the capitalist and the worker. hegemony highlights how people’s identities in everyday life are defined in and through dominant social structures.
- Analyzes spivak's rethinking of how disempowered women in third world focus on new super exploitation on the division of laborer between the workers and the capitalist.
- Analyzes how the subaltern studies historians attempted to recuperate the political voice, will, and agency of the impulsive peasantry movement through a critique of colonial and elite historical representation
- Analyzes how spivak's thought revise and adapt the categories of marxist thought apart from the narrow terms of class politics that consist of other forms of liberation struggles.
- Analyzes how spivak's model of social and historical change was based on the transformation in economic and social relations between the property-owning classes and the working class.
643 wordsRead More - Analyzing And Applying My Sociological Perspectiveexplanatory essayA high-level definition of sociology is the study of society and human behavior; yet, taking a deeper dive, it is the “study of groups and group interactions, societies and social interactions, from small and personal groups to very large groups” (Keirns et al., 2015, p. 6). Sociologists observe these groups by the means of the sociological perspective, which involves looking at particular behaviors and drawing conclusions from them like never before. When executed correctly one can derive a deeper grasp of behavior. Utilizing your sociological imagination you are able to theorize how one’s macro-level, the broader aspects of life such as family, and their micro-level, the individuals self, fuse to form the person they are. Applying my sociological
In this essay, the author
- Explains that sociology is the study of society and human behavior, but taking a deeper dive, it is studying groups and group interactions, from small and personal groups to very large groups.
135 wordsRead More - Comparing Two Sociological Theoriescomparative essayWhile living in Society in today’s world, sociologist still has theories. Theories are interrelated ideas that have a wide range of applications, deal with centrally important issues, and have stood to the test of time (Ritzer & Stepnisky, 2014, p. 24). Sociologists theories are necessary to today’s society. While some theories share the same interest but different concept, we have theories that focus on the negative aspects of society and one’s that focus on the positive aspects of society. Structural- functionalist theory is a theory that focus on the social phenomena, the positive aspect of society. While, Conflict Theory focuses on the negative aspect of society. Two sociological theories but they both focus on the different aspects
In this essay, the author
- Explains that sociologists still have theories, which have a wide range of applications, deal with centrally important issues, and have stood to the test of time.
- Compares conflict theory to the new slavery where people are forced to do things by the people with power, while structural-functionalism theory believes that people that have the power are desirable and necessary to society.
- Explains that both theories look at the aspects of society whether they are negative or positive. they have helped people structure society today.
343 wordsRead More