That’s lets physician be certain that after diagnoses child do not have a psychological shock. Disease severity also has a significant impact should or should not physician despite family wishes about what treatment or what drugs they should get. If it is just a simple ... ... middle of paper ... ...t family wishes. The article authors Ruiping Fan and Benfu Li says, that Confucian Chines practice not to say truth to the patient if family think thinks that it should be hidden. They says, that “…is most important is not for one to know everything and make medicine decision by oneself, but to have the love and interdependence of family members.” (pg#71) .
For a doctor, it is not necessarily important to be completely honest directly with the young patient without talking with family first. This is mainly because the child is not very educated to understand the severity of their condition or the potential outcomes. In addition, the child cannot make decisions independently. It is important for a physician to talk with a child’s parents or guardians prior to discussing the child’s condition with the child itself. This allows the physician be certain that after a diagnosis, the child will be less likely to be psychologically traumatized.
Not understanding how AIDS was acquired and passed on to others made every one fearful. Private health information cannot be revealed to any one without permission of the patient not even to their closest family members or to the patient’s employer. We must encourage honesty from the patient to be able to effectively treat their problems. Legislation has been passed to protect patients with psychiatric problems because the diagnosis of mental health issues can be devastating to a patient. Patients are entitled to a certain amount of privacy regarding their mental health problems as long as they are not a danger to themselves or others.
A practice commonly used in the medical field, “benevolent deception” is the act of physicians suppressing information about diagnoses in hopes of not causing patients emotional turmoil (Skloot 63). Benevolent deception is a contentious subject because when used, the bioethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence can conflict with each other. Respect for autonomy is when physicians acknowledge their patients’ abilities to make voluntary decisions on their own regarding their health care (McCormick 4). Meanwhile, beneficence is the duty of doctors to be of a benefit to patients, while also taking measures to prevent and remove harm from them (McCormick 5). When giving patients diagnoses, physicians need to follow these doctrines by creating a balance between telling the truth and providing hope, which is why some may mistakenly turn to benevolent deception as the answer.
Thesis Statement: The ethics underlying patient confidentiality is periodically questioned in our society due to circumstances that abruptly occur leaving health professionals to decide between right and wrong. A norm in society is when an individual sees danger they are supposed to report it to the authorities, therefore preventing any further damage. Breach of confidentiality is when a nurse shares information about a patient to others who are not authorized to know about the patients personal information. Due to this, patients are afraid to be honest with their physicians and nurses that are treating them. In order to assure pati...
They are sworn to protect their patients through these privacy measures. Mr. Chanko had the right to quality health care the question here is, did he get “quality” health care? I mentioned before, that the attending physician could have been distracted by the camera crews, while trying to tend to Mr. Chanko. The doctors also have duties to carry out these rules and regulations on behalf of their patients. Mr. Chanko clearly did not consent to having camera crews there, thus saying that the crew shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
Paternalism is when a doctor has to put a foot down when a patient is demanding a procedure that is more harmful to them than good (the patient just can’t see it). Doctors are always in the best interest for the patient expect for when paternalism is involved. Sometimes even though a patient is proven mentally competent a doctor has to do what they feel is the right thing to do for the patient even if is overruling the patients decisions. A way to of having benefited the cancer patients of having a baby possibly could have been just taking her to visit some babies to get the feel of what it could be like to be a mothers not actually giving her one of her own to be raised without a mother. Nonmaleficence is a principle that assures a procedure or decision is doing no harm to the
It is the patient’s decision to have a treatment or not depending of the severity of the treatment and how it will affect the patient. The nurse ethical dilemma is whether respect the family’s idea of not informing the patient or following the law regarding the patient’s right of knowing the truth. It is known by the nurse that their responsibility is to protect the safety of the patient and that is why making the decision of telling the truth to the patient knowing that it will affect him/her makes it so difficult. It is imperative for the nurses to know the right of the family members in the patient’s
There are four options the doctor can consider: refusal of the surgery, perform the surgery without blood considering the parent’s wishes, perform the surgery with blood respecting the decision of the patient, or complete the surgery with blood and do not inform the parents. When asking whether or not parents should make the decision for the child in this case, concerns could be raised as to if the patient is endangered by their own parents. When a parent is basing a lifesaving decision on religious beliefs that the patient might not even reciprocate, is the parent looking out for the child or their religious reputation? In this particular case, the patient’s surgery would be a low-risk and high-benefit procedure and the patient expresses her wishes in favor o... ... middle of paper ... ...usion? Remember, Jehovah requires that we abstain from blood.
According to Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions “Counselors are expected to be able to set aside their personal belief and values when working with a wide range of clients.” However, there will be situations where the counselor will not agree with the client but the counselor should not judge their client. A counselor might take a challenge when working with a client if the counselor does not believe in abortions. The counselor can be against abortions but the client will benefit from the abortion because the client might believe that will be the solutions for their current problems. A counselor should not disclose their values and beliefs towards abortion because the counselor is there for the client to support them with their problems. A counselor talking about their personal values and beliefs to the client towards abortion can bring ethical issue towards the client or the client will withdrawal from services because does not agree with their counselor.