Was Oliver Cromwell A Leader Or Tyrant Essay

1000 Words2 Pages

Oliver Cromwell a leader or tyrant of Britain Oliver Cromwell was a man that was of low birth that rose to the top of society in his time. He was fearless in battle and in politics fighting anything that got in his way. The bull of a man took many bashings and still live for years. To some people Oliver Cromwell was a great leader by bring together the United Kingdom and becoming the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth. These people also thought he was a sincere protect of religion and would make the kingdom prosper. To the others, he was considered to be dictatorial murder, who use his Puritanical beliefs to make a mask for his lust of power. The United Kingdoms was on the brink of war under King Charles I. Historians believe that there were social tensions growing from the population increase, worsening unemployment, poverty, and disorder. The middle class was growing in influence over the United Kingdoms. There were power struggles between parliament and the royalty for who should have the most power, but the …show more content…

Oliver Cromwell’s attempt to reform the intolerant religious system in England, created under Charles I, into a relatively flexible Church is certainly benevolent feat. Non-conformist services which inevitably followed the disorders of the Civil War were encouraged by Cromwell in an attempt to allow a degree of religious variety within a framework of acceptable policy. He remained a dependable backer of tolerance for all Protestants. His personal sympathies for the more radical religious factions are epitomised by the case of James Nayler, a Quaker who in 1656 reenacted the entry of Christ into Jerusalem through the gates at Bristol. Viewed as extremely intolerable by the more traditional members of the Second Protectorate Parliament, Nayler narrowly escaped a death sentence, rescued only by Cromwell’s personal

Open Document