The nuclear stockpile residing in Pakistani creates a potentially devastating threat to the security of the world. For years Taliban, Al Qaeda, and terrorists sympathizers have emphasized a necessity to obtain Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. The United States has recognized the importance of securing the weapons, but Pakistan is persistently assuring the U.S. of the stockpiles safety and has even taken offense to such safety accusations. It is hard to thoroughly trust the credibility of Pakistani statements because of the connection between the Pakistan government and terrorist organizations. Despite continuous allegations from Pakistan regarding the safety of their nuclear stockpile, the U.S. should intervene and cease the arsenal due to increasing terrorist threats, corrupt Pakistani officials working with the terrorists, and a weak political infrastructure showing signs of failing.
Concern has arose over a fear that Terrorist forces in a region of increasing instability could possibility gain control of the weapons or seize nuclear materials. According to American intelligence assessments, Pakistan’s arsenal is the sixth largest in the world, and could potentially become the fifth largest if they continue to expand their stockpile. Pakistan has established new nuclear reactors and have expand their variety of nuclear materials. According to David E. Sanger, and Eric Schitt, writers for the New York Times, the amount of weapons in their are arsenal were, “in the mid-to-high 70s.” Laboratories around the country contain nuclear material, and the factories that make them are at risk of terrorist thievery or complete seizure. Pakistan has not complied with President Obama’s proposal to stop the production of nuclear weapons. Rather Pak...
... middle of paper ...
...ear security. Recent elections have shown a rise in democracy and the general population’s steady decline of Taliban support. However, there have been significant facts and examples showing threats of terrorism infiltrating their nuclear system, and potentially running the government. Corruption has continued to loiter despite Pakistan’s claimed screening and security measures. Also, continued attacks on the stability of government remain active and extremism continues to create a presence outside of the government. The solution to this complex problem should favor the side of U.S. intervention, rather than waiting for Pakistan to take control of the problem. Pakistan had proven incapable in solving their nuclear weapons issues and has instead created a situation detrimental to the peace of the world and in particular the safely of the United States and their allies.
What Nuclear power has the ability to do is get a lot of power in a little amount of space. “Roughly 1.6 billion people live without access to electricity, and 2.4 billion rely on traditional biomass because they have no access to modern fuel.” (General Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei) With nuclear power put into these countries that are without power we can have it to where electricity will be accessibility to everyone. By having power accessible to everyone we can accomplish so much more and unlock more possibilities in our world today.
Nolan, Janne E. 1999. An Elusive Consensus: Nuclear Weapons and American Security After the Cold War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
(Intro)Imagine living in a world of destruction were your days are counted and only have limited chances of survival. In the passage called”A petition to the president of the United States” the physicist that were behind the Manhattan Project which was organized by president Franklin. D.Roosevelt and later lead by President Harry. S.Truman was a project specifically meant for the harnessing fusion to create a weapon of mass destruction now known as a “BOMB” which would be scheduled to drop on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945,,and these bombs would release harsh levels of radiation that is so powerful that anybody near the bomb site would be vaporized and killed instantly because of the radiation poisoning and dropping of such bomb
Due to the devastation between 1941 and 1945, approximately half a million American lives were consumed in response to defend the United States. In contrary to the declination of intensity of World War II in the European hemisphere, Japan does not gestures any signs of retreat on the Pacific in the spring of 1945. Japanese confrontation, Iwo Jima and Okinawa alone, accounts for more than 18,000 American deaths and 36,000 wounded. Pressure weighed heavy as President Harry Truman entered office. The rise of information reached Truman on the Manhattan Project in which research was invested in the upcoming manufacturing of the World`s first atomic bomb. The use of nuclear warfare remains questionable. Americans confounded by the bombing of Hiroshima
The dropping of the first atomic bomb marked a turning point in the way nations fight one another. The destructive nature of the atomic bomb changed the course of warfare forever. “The effectiveness of nuclear deterrence is best explained by the fact that it was based on fear unlike other peace-keeping strategies of the twentieth century.” This gradual shift to a “fear based” strategy was in response to the failures of previous peace keeping strategies earlier in the century during World War I and II, including the Wilsonian ideals, the treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I, and the concept of appeasement prior to the start of World War II.
Out of all the dangerous powers and authority our government wields, possibly the most threatening powers are nuclear weapons. People tend to be frightened by things they do not understand, which make nuclear weapons a perfect catalyst for fear. These weapons have the most overwhelming and destructive power known to man; although, nuclear weapons are only safe in countries that try to maintain harmony and stability. Nuclear weapons are defined as “explosive devices whose destructive potential derives from the release of energy that accompanies the splitting or combining of atomic nuclei.” This power is both dangerous and unstable in the hands of small erratic countries.
In early August 1945 atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These two bombs quickly yielded the surrender of Japan and the end of American involvement in World War II. By 1946 the two bombs caused the death of perhaps as many as 240,000 Japanese citizens1. The popular, or traditional, view that dominated the 1950s and 60s – put forth by President Harry Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson – was that the dropping of the bomb was a diplomatic maneuver aimed at intimating and gaining the upper hand in relations with Russia. Today, fifty-four years after the two bombings, with the advantage of historical hindsight and the advantage of new evidence, a third view, free of obscuring bias and passion, can be presented. First, the dropping of the bomb was born out of complex infinite military, domestic and diplomatic pressures and concerns. Second, many potentially viable alternatives to dropping the bombs were not explored by Truman and other men in power, as they probably should have been. Lastly, because these alternatives were never explored, we can only conjecture over whether or not Truman’s decision was a morally just one, and if indeed it was necessary to use atomic energy to win the war.
World War II brought up many new technologies for warfare. Advanced on existing developments such as weaponry, ships, vehicles air crafts, navigational devices and medicine are just a few broad examples of developments in warfare during this time in United States and World history. One development, however, changed the entire way of warfare. The Atomic bomb was developed during this time out of fears that the Germans had the same technologies, or at least were working to obtain it. Once the United States had this technological capability of producing atomic weapons, the way of fighting was changed. Two bombs were dropped on Japan in August of 1945, one on the city of Hiroshima and the other on the city of Nagasaki. Afterward, the ear of atomic diplomacy came up in American international relations, which as we have seen today, has led to the development of even stronger, more deadly weaponry and bombs. The bombing of Japan also brings up the still prevalent debate of whether the bombings were justifiable or not. Historians Gar Alperovitz, Robert P. Newman and Barton Bernstein all have written essays expressing their opinions in the matter.
The main parties who is associated with the debate are governments, experts, and the country people. These people have given out their opinions regarding the effects of nuclear ene...
The nuclear arms race was a race for nuclear dominance between the United States and the Soviet Union. It took place during the cold war. The definition of an arms race, made famous by nuclear arms race during the Cold War is a rapid increase in instruments of military power. A nuclear arms race is one where the instruments are nuclear weapons. The designs and testing of the first nuclear weapons during WWII by the US was called the Manhattan Project. The USSR was not officially informed about the Manhattan project until about 3 years later when Stalin was briefed at the Potsdam Conference on July 24 1945, this conference was 8 days after the first successful US test of nuclear weapons. They soon regretted telling the USSR from a fear that the USSR would inform German spies of the Manhattan Project or that the USSR would expect some insight on the technology of these weapons. In August 1945 a month after the Potsdam conference President Harry Truman ordered two bombs two be dropped on Japan, one hit Nagasaki and one hit Hiroshima. In the years after WWII the US had a monopoly on information about nuclear technology. Behind the scenes the USSR began work on their nuclear weapons but they were limited because of a lack of uranium. Then, the USSR discovered uranium in Eastern Europe which boosted their technology. nuclear experts predicted the Soviets would not have their first nuclear weapons until about 1955 but they detonated their first test nuclear weapon in 1949. The US tested their first hydrogen weapons at the Bikini Atoll in 1954. Both countries spent massives amounts on the quantity and quality of their weapons. For many decades the amounts of nuclear weapons and technology for the USSR and the US went back and forth. Curre...
After the first few days of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Americans, without knowledge of the aftermath of these cities, began cheering and celebrating as the bombings marked the end of World War II. Also, this event showed that Americans would be the ones who would lead the world into the nuclear age. In a Gallup Poll taken from August 10-15, 1945, Americans were asked whether or not they approved or disapproved of the use of atomic bombs on Japanese cities, 85 percent approved, ten percent disapproved and five had no opinion.30 then when asked if the development of the atomic bomb was a good or bad thing, 69 percent said it was a good thing, 17 percent said it was bad, and 14 percent had no opinion (Steele).
From the creation of nuclear weapons at the start of the Cold War to today, the world has experienced struggles fueled by the want of nuclear power. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Iran’s nuclear weapon program are some of the most important conflicts over nuclear weapons. Thanks to the use of nuclear weapons in 1945 to end World War II, the world has come extremely close to a nuclear war, and more countries have began developing nuclear power. Unmistakably, many conflicts since the start of the Cold War have been caused by nuclear weapons, and there are many more to come.
The nuclear arms race was a competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War.(Nuclear Arms Race, Wikipedia)
Pakistan is the basis in the international fight against terrorism to this day. Many Pakistani terrorist groups have made many terrorist attacks around the world. Pakistan faced the choice siding with or staying against the United States during the aftermath of 9/11. Violence in Pakistan has increased for many years as terrorist groups have targeted many political leaders, tribal leaders, the military, and also schools. Pakistan is divided into people who see the country as modern and/o...
According to Stouten, John the author of the article the likelihood of a nuclear attack is greater than ever says that countries in the Middle East and Korea are building nuclear arms every day” (15). The Middle East won’t stop making weapons of mass destruction until someone or the US comes in there and destroys or seizes all of their weapons. We should be concerned about Weapons of mass destruction and never let it just float by us. Some Politicians don’t understand the threats of other countries and there weapons of mass destruction that could wipe out a great and big city like San Francisco or New York, New York and it could kill millions of people and a lot more than that. All we have to do is look at places that have experienced this like Hiroshima, Japan or Chernobyl. We don’t want this to happen to us because the toll of the damage would be unbearable to see or hear about. Are country hasn’t experienced something like that before except 9/11.