Hydraulic Fracturing: Economic Powerhouse or Environmental Disaster? In erstwhile decades, the economic practice of oil production has perennially been subjugated to the Middle East. However, the rise of domestic production of crude oil and natural gas from shale in the United States has culminated in the passing of Saudi Arabia in terms of oil production. This economic milestone is owed in due part to a relatively-recent implementation of hydraulic fracturing, commonly referred to as “fracking.” According to Aaron Herridge of Shale Gas España, hydraulic fracturing is “…an effective method of extracting natural gas (and oil) from natural shale formations.” In the process, a well cased in steel is injected with millions of pounds of “fracture fluid,” a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals, and the resulting pressure compels shale rock to create fissures, allowing for natural gas to be pumped back to the surface, along with fracture fluids. In fact, the chemicals in fracture fluid are the catalysts for environmental ramifications. When coinciding with oil spills and dangerous natural compounds, the negatives outweigh the positives. Despite hydraulic fracturing’s auspicious impact upon the U.S.’s production of oil, it poses as a significant threat to the health of the environment; through the proliferation of fractured wells, the use of dangerous chemicals, and high numbers of oil spills, water contamination, land damage, and air pollution have resulted. Undoubtedly the most precarious form of pollution that can beset the environment, water contamination has plagued the mindset that hydraulic fracturing is the future powerhouse of the American economy. According to Elizabeth Ridlington of Frontier Group, there are three particular ... ... middle of paper ... ...g testing market gives a positive premonition that many of the environmental ramifications of hydraulic fracturing will dissipate (Brino). Works Cited Brino, Anthony, Nearing, Brian. “New Waterlesss Fracking Method Avoids Pollution Problems, but Drillers Slow to Embrace It.” Inside Climate News. 6 Nov. 2011. Web. FracFocus. Find a Well. Map. [1:500,000]. GWPC and IOGCC, 2011. Web. Herridge, Aaron, Kerwin, Teresa, Lestarjette, Tricia, Schmidt, Mat, and Wohlgemuth, Lara. “The Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing.” Powerpoint presentation. Web. 8 July 2014. Hoffman, Joe. “Potential Health and Environmental Effects of Hydrofracking in the Williston Basin, Montana.” SERC Carleton. NAGT, 26 June 2014. Web. 8 July 2014. Ridlington, Elizabeth, Rumpler, John. “Fracking by the Numbers: Key Impacts of Dirty Drilling at the State and National Level.” 8 July 2014. PDF File.
6. "The Environmental Impact of Hydraulic Fracking." G4tv.com. N.p., 20 Apr. 2012. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
In today's global economy, energy is one of the most crucial and sought after commodities. Who supplies it and how much they supply determines how much influence they have over other countries as well as the global economy. This is why hydraulic fracturing is currently such an important and controversial topic in the United States. Hydraulic fracturing, more commonly known as "fracking" or hydrofracturing, is the process of using pressurized liquids to fracture rocks and release hydrocarbons such as shale gas, which burns more efficiently than coal. This booming process of energy production provides a much needed economic boost, creating jobs and providing gas energy for Americans. The efficiently burning shale gas reduces carbon emission from electricity production plants, reducing carbon footprints on the environment. However, the process of hydraulic fracturing uses millions of gallons of pressurized liquid, which contains toxic chemicals, and some of this water is left over undealt with. The air near fracking sites is often also polluted and unsafe for nearby community residents. Injecting millions of gallons of water laced with toxic chemicals into the rock thousands of feet deep can cause earthquakes, causing a safety hazards for all nearby areas. Hydraulic Fracturing makes rare natural gases easily attainable, boosting the economy and reducing carbon emissions. However, the negative side effects such as contaminated water and air, make hydraulic fracturing a process that may not be worth the benefits.
Current research, in the field of public health, is looking at the adverse health effects of hydraulic fracturing on community members. This research is focused on looking for evidence-based research in processes, procedures, materials and cleanup from drilling and running a well. In recent years, several states such as Maryland and New York, have called for special advisory commissions to examine the potential adverse health implications for the community if the moratoriums are lifted and fracturing is allowed to start. A lot of the previous research conducted focused on the anecdotal perspective of the adverse health effects. This perspective does not offer scientific verification that the fracturing processes are causing them or evidence where the contaminations are coming from.
Ever since the process of hydraulic fracturing—or fracking—made its entrance to the oil industry, issues and problems surrounding the process have become a common occurrence. Fracking is the controversial process of horizontal drilling (see fig. 1), where millions of gallons of water mixed with sand and chemicals are pumped deep into an oil well to extract natural gas from the earth’s crust (Ehrenberg 20). This practice has even been banned in some places (see fig. 1). The methane that comes out of the earth and the water used—called fracking fluid—has the potential to cause problems with local ground water supplies. Whether or not fracking is the cause of these problems, concern should be observed during the fracking process to reduce the chances of water contamination among residential areas.
In the documentary Gasland the main concerns of Josh Fox regarding hydraulic fracturing were the industry was highly unregulated and reckless which caused the contamination of ground and drinking water which was the cause of illness.. The most important concern Josh had was hydraulic fracturing was causing the contamination of peoples ground and drinking water. He claims hydraulic fracturing is causing gases such as methane and heavy metals such as mercury, use...
Fracking can cause harm to people, animals, and nature. When they drill into the ground they are pumping chemicals to extract the gas and oil, and this contaminates the water sources around it. “An editorial on gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale in the Post-Star, a newspaper in Glens Falls, New York, contends, “New York state simply can’t take the risk. There are plenty of places to find fuel. It’s not so easy to find a new water supply for 17 million people.”” (Hydrofracking
...king have been placed on shale fracking. This is where fuel is fracked from the harder surfaces, causing more affects to the earth. They do allow tight gas fracking, which is not a dangerous (Inside Climate News). Either form of fracking have many worried about what the future of the country will be.
Hydraulic fracturing, commonly referred to as fracking, is a widespread practice in the United States. Fracking is a method used to extract oil and natural gas. Scientists and citizens report detrimental side effects of hydraulic drilling. New York and Vermont have banned fracking statewide. Maryland has set a two year moratorium on fracking, so that more research can be done to show the impacts of fracking on the environment. Nationwide, many other cities and counties have banned fracking as well. All states should look into finding alternative sources of energy, instead of using devastating practices like fracking to extract non-renewable resources.
In his article “How Fracking Is Bad for Our Bodies,” Jason Silverstein who is a lecturer and writer in residence in the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School states the problem of hydraulic fracking in cities in the US. Silverstein article, which was published in, The Atlantic, on October 8, 2013, shows the problems caused by hydraulic fracking. Although Silverstein provides a wide array of disadvantages of fracking, he does not mention any advantages brought by fracking.
Before one can see the devastating effects of fracking, one must first understand how fracking works. As previously stated, the main intent of hydro-fracking is to access and harvest natural gas that lies below the surface of the Earth. Having formed over 400 million years ago by the collision of tectonic plates (Marsa 3), the Marcellus Shale plays host to a gold mine of natural gas, which is currently at the center of the fracking debate in the Northeastern region of the United States. Unfortunately, access...
The use of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has been both a blessing and a curse to us. It holds great promise and great demise in one bundle, where when we have one we have the other. I feel fracking is good, but if not monitored it can lead to mass pollution and the destruction of environments.
Fracking has become a highly controversial and publicized topic due to rising concerns and growing analysis into the mutual benefits of hydraulic fracturing to retrieve natural gas and oil reserves. With concerns of water pollution, mismanagement of toxic waste and irreversible
Hydraulic fracturing can be very damaging to the human body, there have even been lawsuits. Bob and Lisa Parr stated that after suffering through years of things such as rashes, ringing ears, nosebleeds, and nausea they had enough. The Parr’s sued the company, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and once the case was over, they ended up receiving almost three million dollars. (The Fracking Facts) This is significant because this was the first lawsuit that was successful in the United States that was linked to poisonous air pollution of gas or oil production. Also, in 2012 a company known as Chesapeake Energy Corporation was found guilty of contaminating the drinking water of three families in Pennsylvania. Leading to a 1.6 million dollar lawsuit. Stated the article The Fracking Facts.
The process of hydraulic fracturing has been around since the 1940’s, though not until recent years has it been an economically viable option. Hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”, refers to the process of injecting large volumes of water, mixed with a proppant (usually sand) and chemicals, down a well at high pressures in order to fracture underground formations with low permeability. Due to technology advances allowing companies to drill horizontal wells in recent years, the use of fracking has grown exponentially in the United States. This is due to the fact that fracking has allowed oil and natural gas companies to feasibly produce large hydrocarbon supplies in low-permeable shale formations, which were previously thought to be economically inaccessible. This natural gas “boom” caused by widespread use of hydraulic fracturing has provided great opportunities for the United States. By creating a large domestic energy supply, the US has been able to lower dependence on foreign oil imports. Also, natural gas has emerged as a viable fuel source and even burns cleaner than other fossil fuels. Though, fracking has also become a hot topic from an ethical standpoint, with alarming environmental detriments coming to light. With claims and studies that hydraulic fracturing has caused water contamination, water shortages, and even earthquakes, many people are questioning its current use and future viability. Some counties and states are even beginning to completely ban the use of fracking overall. The first canon of the National Society of Professional Engineers code of ethics states that all engineers should “hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public.” (NSPE.org) In order to uphold this code, I believe the env...
Numerous reports have been given on the dangerous affects of hydraulic fracturing. One such affect that has been noticed is that drinking water wells near the fracturing sites have been contaminated. During the hydro-fracking process, injected fluids that help to break and keep open the rock bed where the natural gas is kept, have “been known to travel three thousand feet from the well (Goldman).” This fluid could have the potential to enter and contaminate any water well for homes around hydraulic fracturing sites. This incident is one of the major problems that people want to figure out and know about before they allow a fracturing site by them. It has been the most feared outcome of having a fracking site nearby, and it is highly appropriate. One site in Wyoming had this happen, “…in August, EPA reported that eleven of thirty-nine drinking-water wells near a Wyoming hydraulic fracturing operation were contaminated with chemicals used in the fracturing process (Hobson EPA).” In Pennsylvania, another such case occurred, “There have already been severe pollution cases in Pennsylvania, mo...