Essay On Formative Evaluation

769 Words2 Pages

The evaluation of distance learning and classroom training are equally important to ensure that effective learning occurs, even though the measures used for evaluating both types of training differ quite substantially. The reason for the difference lies in the vastly different infrastructure components required by each. Despite the infrastructure differences, it is the outcomes of training that matter most, since the outcomes determine if effective learning took place (Lockee, Moore, & Burton, 2002).
Several measures are employed to evaluate the effectiveness of distance learning training. Beyond Kirkpatrick’s four levels of evaluation, training coordinators often utilize formative and summative evaluation methods. Formative evaluations …show more content…

Instructional design issues include, among other, teaching strategy and assessment methods. Training evaluators consider instructional design issues to ensure maximum learning effectiveness in terms and alignment with training program goals. Other aspects evaluated during the formative evaluation include course clarity, clarity of learning objectives, practice opportunities, evaluation opportunities, and the use of examples that support learning. Interface design evaluations include among other, navigation, aesthetics, legibility, performance, and ease of use. Evaluators consider interface design issues because the best learning content will fail to produce effective learning if learners suffer from a poorly designed, confusing, or troublesome training interface. Evaluators could also consider ADA requirements for students with disabilities, which include the addition of audio, larger text and graphics, and subtitles and audio transcripts. Frequent assessments during the formative evaluation will help to eliminate learner issues during course participation (Lockee, Moore, & Burton, …show more content…

Outcomes include three categories, namely performance outcomes, attitude outcomes, and programmatic outcomes. Performance outcomes consider data from training course evaluations, like assessments and tests, in relation to course objectives. Student performance results are especially useful to determine if learning occurred and if learning objectives are achieved. Attitude outcomes evaluate the sentiment of learners towards the training program, the learning experience, and the hosting institution. Attitude data is collected through evaluations, interviews, questionnaires, observations, and focus groups. Programmatic outcomes study the impact of the training program by evaluating, among other, enrollment numbers, attrition rates, and faculty time, and it utilizes learner demographics and geographic information to determine market reach (Lockee, Moore, & Burton, 2002).
The implementation evaluation covers the broadest area the summative evaluation and is concerned with the total implementation of the distance-learning program. It includes various stakeholders, like trainers, students, supporting personnel. The implementation evaluation includes factors such as the reliability and stability of supporting technology, accessibility, and the effectiveness of student support services. It is also covers other aspects, including learner readiness and expectations, faculty readiness and performance,

Open Document