Essay On Efficient Market Hypothesis

1361 Words6 Pages
The concept of Efficient Market Hypothesis has weak bases. The efficacy of these assumption depends upon strength of one of the three situations. Coherent investment decisions, liberated irrational investment decisions, and arbitrage. In practice, none of these three conditions are valid. An alternate method, to explain capital market performance, based on psychology is gaining significance in the field of finance. The concept of 'efficient market hypothesis' was introduced by Eugene Fama in mid-1960s. According to this concept, the powerful struggle in the capital market leads to reasonable valuing of debt and equity securities. The perception is based on the replication of related evidence in market prices of the securities. If only past information is reflected in 'weak-from efficient markets; past as well as present information is reflected in 'semi-strong form efficient markets'; past, present, and future information is reflected in 'strong-form efficient markets'. Efficient market hypothesis has reflective effects for corporate finance and investment management. Implications for corporate finance 1. Managers cannot dupe the market through imaginative accounting. 2. Companies cannot effectively stretch matters of debt and equity. 3. Managers cannot successfully venture in securities market. 4. Managers can gain paybacks by giving responsiveness to market prices. Implications for investment management 1. If the market is efficient in weak-form, investors cannot obtain unusual returns by evaluating related past information about the securities. However, it is possible to obtain unusual returns by examining existing information and upcoming information. Thus, investment tools like strainer plan, technical analysis will not be ac... ... middle of paper ... ...the motivation to trade, and tiny inefficiencies might not be priced away. Limitations to Arbitrage Ideally, if two securities are mispriced relative to their risk one is sold-out short and also the different purchased. The sale of one and get of the other can drive each toward their economical worth. In follow, there are four issues related to this. It is unsure once, if ever, costs can come back to equilibrium. The mispricing may become even a lot of pronounced within the meanwhile, doubtless forcing the businessman to shut the position. Two assets seldom have identical risks. If there are not any shut substitutes for a given security, no arbitrage could also be potential. Arbitrageurs have restricted access to capital. Solely the foremost obvious mispricing is exploited. Arbitrageurs might face restrictions on mercantilism by the owners of the capital they use.
Open Document