Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
decision making in economic
mixed economic system essay
mixed economic system essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: decision making in economic
How People Make Economic Decisions
Joanna P. Curran
University of Phoenix
April 28, 2014
Almost everyone in our society engages in economic decision making at some point. Budget constraints influence us all and our economic decision making. In a perfect world, the sum of all our expenses should never exceed the availability of our money. The basis of economic decision making is one’s desire to maximize benefits while minimizing costs. “Economist reason that the optimal decision is to continue any activity up to the point where the marginal benefit equals the marginal cost – in symbols, where MB=MC.” Hubbard, R.G. & O’Brien, A.P. (2013).
I recently purchased a new car, I put off doing this for a very long time. I had no car payment and I knew when I purchased a new car I would need to finance it, and would in turn take on more debt and a monthly car payment. It got to the point that I was spending a great deal of money repairing my car to have something new break down the next month, the MB=MC. I knew at this point I needed a new car. The marginal benefit of not having a car payment was equal to the marginal cost of repairs. When I factored in the incentives of purchasing a new car such as better gas mileage (a savings of $200 per month), reliability, no more repair bills, I determined that it made sense to invest in a new car.
Economist believe there are four basic principles to individual decision-making, they are people face trade-offs, the cost of something is what you give up to get it, people are rational, and people respond to incentives. Costs and benefits are key factors that all economic decision makers take into account. They believe that for every decision, something must be gained and something must be lost. The...
... middle of paper ...
...pend their money. Some of the most prosperous economies in the world such as the US, Canada, Japan, and Great Britain are based on the concept of a market economy. The basic idea of the mixed economy is that it allows the people free will to make decisions except for when the government steps in creating an indirect influence over the economy. India functions in a mixed economy system.
I believe that the happiest and most prosperous people live in a market economy. The people living in a centrally planned economy are probably for the most part not very happy, as they do not get to decide for themselves their career paths, and they can be stuck in a job that they don’t like in a field they have no interest in; that would be horrible. A mixed economy would be an alright economic system, not as good as a market system but much better than a centrally planned economy.
While comparing these two economies, command and market along with capitalism and Socialism, I have learned to differentiate between the two. The command economies tend to lower overall freedom but focus on giving the basic needs of the people. While the market economies focus on the best way to create goods and services and give the people more freedom. These are the two most common economies in the world and it is surprising that both are able to work so well. There are instances where some people are irritated by some regulations put into their economies, but they manage to keep going on and not lose total order.
According to Clarke and Cornish (2001, p. 34), “the rational choice perspective was explicitly developed to assist policy thinking … specifically through detailed modeling of criminal decision making. The theory theorizes that offenders who have chosen to commit criminal acts, do so because of the reward it brings to them. Coupled with the different conditions that are needed for specific crimes to occur, with its emphasizes on the role of crime opportunities in causation.
In a market economy people have the freedom to own private businesses to create goods and services for the people. Canada has many individual businesses that are able to sell products without the intervention of the government. Consumers also have the right to buy/sell what they choose (in accordance to laws), which results in the decisions of Canadian citizens having a strong affect on Canada’s economy. The features of market economies also influence Canada’s mixed economy through the competition between various businesses because this creates employment for Canadians. Canada’s economy is similar to market economies because in Canada, depending on how well you work and give effort into completing tasks and achieving certain goals, citizens can earn jobs for their qualifications. If an individual does not work hard, they can not have the opportunity to get luxuries. An example of this is a person who has gained the skills to become a doctor is able to do so and is recognized for that, as well, through their salary and job benefits. This idea encourages Canadian citizens to strive to get a good education in order to lead a better
The decision-making model not as simple as selfish or self-interest, it’s the “theory of human choice based on scientific principles of observation and experiment”, but not “postulation and deduction” (page 397). Observation reflects it has been learned or acknowledged from patient look or research about the cause and effect, experiment means it has been thought, be consider the pros and cons. Even though it might not be think over and think through, it must be different than “creating something out of nothing”. There are four princi...
Throughout history, many different types of economic models and theories have been developed. These different philosophies of business often were an important and integral part of a government’s basic structure. For example communist countries like China and the Soviet Union practiced a type of socialism. While, democratic nations like the United States and Canada practice forms of capitalism. Also within these economic models exists different theories as well such as Keynsian economics and laissez faire economics. To understand how these types of economies work in the world today, it is important to study and define a variety of economic systems. Researching such economic systems as capitalism and socialism, and also looking at the ideas of laissez faire and the Keynsian economics, a person will start to have a better understanding of how business works in the world today.
Since the origin of supply and demand mankind has done its best to harness the unpredictable tendencies of the economy. To this day it is still a process of trial and error in deciding which economic system works best for the world’s economy. Socialism, capitalism and Keynesian economics are all philosophies that show promise on paper and have been put to the test across the world. Although there are benefits to each one of these systems, they all seem to fall short when met with reality.
The economics, as an independent subject has already existed in this world for a long time. Maybe some people believe that the knowledge which is contained in economics is so far from them that it is not necessary to consider about is. Actually, economics always hides in our daily life and effects decisions what we made. Once I have hold the same opinion of economics is not really my business, but I do not think like this any more after I studied this subject. Economics no longer acts as an abstract terminology lying on the textbook far away from me, this word became meaningful and I am sure it will make some changes not only in my mind, but also in my future life.
An 'economic cost-benefit analysis' approach to reasoning sees actions favoured and chosen if the benefit outweighs the cost. Here, the benefits and costs are in the form of economic benefits and costs, such as, monetary loss or profit. One who is motivated by such an approach will deem a course of action preferable if doing so results in an economic profit. Conversely, actions will be avoided if they result in an economic loss (Kelman 1981).
The Economy is the backbone to society. There are many factors that operate in, and govern our society’s economical structure. Factors such as scarcity and choice, opportunity cost, marginal analysis, microeconomics, macroeconomics, factors of production, production possibilities, law of increasing opportunity cost, economic systems, circular flow model, money, and economic costs and profits all contribute to what is known as the economy. These properties as well as a few others, work together to influence the economy. Microeconomics and Macroeconomics are two major components. Both of these are broken down into several different components that dictate societal norms and views.
Making business decisions involves choosing between alternative courses of action. Many factors affect business decisions, yet analysis typically focuses on finding the alternative that offers the highest return on investment or the greatest reduction in costs. Some decisions are based on little more than an intuitive understanding of the situation because available information is too limited to allow a more systematic analysis. In other cases, intangible factors such as convenience, prestige, and environmental considerations are more important than strictly quantitative factors. In all situations, managers can reach a sounder decision if they identify the consequences of alternative choices in financial terms. This unit
The four principles of individual decision- making suggest that people face trade off. People have to give up a thing to acquire some other thing. This includes money, time, resources, and energy. The cost of something is what a person is willing to give up to obtain it. Therefore, the need is to find an alternative and then to compare and contrast the cost and the benefits of the alternative action by making a rational decision. Rational people think at a margin. Rational people purposefully evaluate options and opportunities. The marginal benefit is look at from the viewpoint of the consumers’ end of the equation, whereas, the marginal cost affect the producers. ...
The theory of Nash equilibrium by John Nash (1951) has been a central concept in game theories and further more for a wide range from economics even to the social and environmental sciences studies. Besides the game theory, David (2012) has recalled that, there are three unrealistic traits of standard economic model of human behavior – “unbounded rationality, unbounded willpower, and unbounded selfishness – all of which behavioral economics modifies.” However, consider the assumption of Nash equilibrium theory, there is a hypothesis about all players in the game they are rational and understand the rule of the game. Which means they do know about their opponents choices and what reaction they are going to choose with the goal of profit maximization (or their own objectively goal). In the following there will be a further discussion and line out the practicality of Nash equilibrium.
A market economy is a society that is industrialized. For example, there are factories and workers that make goods. But a society does not need capitalism to be industrialized. A market economy is where there are people who compete. They try to get money by themselves and only for them. They are money greedy and the want it all. This is a goal and this is what a market economy focuses on. But even though society is industrialized, they have limits. They are controlled by the government. For example, Social Security is controlled by the government. When the government controls, institutions do not have many rights. For social security, there are qualifications and these qualifications are made by the government. But the poor face more problems than the rich. For example, the rich have more power and control the ways there
An economic man is an economic model that is used to measure conditions and achieve theories of how a person behaves to make decisions.
Therefore, to achieve this objective, managers have to make choices in decision-making, which is the process of selecting a course of action from two or more alternatives (Weihrich & Koontz; 1994, 199). A sound decision making requires extensive knowledge of economic theory and the tools of economic analysis, that are directly related in the process of decision-making. Since managerial economics is concerned with such economic theories and tools of analysis, it is very relevant to the managerial decision-making process.