Essay On Anselm's Ontological Argument
analytical Essay
861 words
Anselm supported the ontological argument because he wanted to clarify that God exists. Deductive and employing priori reasoning is what defines the ontological argument. It begins a statement that is understood to be correct merely be meaning and instituting a proper conclusion for that statement. By employing deductive reasoning it permits Anselm to display what the meaning means. In this paper I will argue that Anselm’s ontological argument does depend on Anselm’s confidential faith in God.
Anselm was a stable believer in God, so he wanted to use logic and reason to confirm his forceful faith and clarify God’s existence. Anselm’s argument was given in chapter two of Proslogion. Its main focus was the meaning of God. Furthermore he claims that everyone, whether they trust in God or not agrees alongside this definition. Anselm approves there is a difference amid understanding that God exists and understanding him to be a concept. To clarify this extra, he gives the analogy of a painter. He states that, in advance a gifted painter makes a masterpiece; he can discern it visibly in his mind even nevertheless he knows it doesn’t exist. He comprehends it as an idea. Though, after the painting has been finished and can be perceived by the man in reality, the painter comprehends the believed of the painting and its existence. The upcoming period is the locale that an advocate of God who approves alongside Anselm’s argument will be at.
In chapter three there is a somewhat disparate side of the ontological argument. It centers on the nature of God than the meaning of him. Particularly, this chapter centers on the early quality of God that is the fact that he needs to exist. Inanimate things, supplementary living things, and humans are ...
... middle of paper ...
...stence. If this was real God should not be worthy of worship and should not be the biggest conceivable being. A vital God, one whose nonexistence is impossible, is larger than a contingent God whose nonexistence is possible. God has no creator, so to have to have someone else to depend on for attendance, way they are not God. Therefore, we have to accord that God is additionally vital, as well as existent in reality, because to contemplate or else involves a contradiction. The reason for people being able to repudiate the attendance of God is due to them knowing the meaning of the word God, not the attendance of God.
In this paper, I have argued that Anselm’s ontological argument is reliant on Anselm’s confidential faith in God, Anselm by now trust in God, and the argument is plainly and endeavor to change Anselm’s faith into a kind of intellectual understanding.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that anselm supported the ontological argument because he wanted to clarify that god exists.
- Analyzes how anselm used logic and reason to confirm his forceful faith and clarify god's existence.
- Analyzes the disparate side of the ontological argument, which centers on the nature of god than the meaning of him.
- Examines anselm's replies to disapprovals of his arguments by his associates, gaunilo, in his book shouted in behalf of the fool.
- Analyzes anselm's response to the criticism that parallel arguments such as the perfect island don't work because they are contingent, not vital and self-reliant.
- Analyzes how anselm states that god exists in the mind, even those who repudiate his existence, but he points out that it is larger to continue in reality and in mind.
- Argues that god is additionally vital, as well as existent in reality, because to contemplate or otherwise involves a contradiction.
- Argues that anselm's ontological argument is reliant on his confidential faith in god. the argument endeavors to change his faith into a kind of intellectual understanding.
Related
- analytical
- Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysisanalytical essayIn this paper I will argue that Anselm’s ontological argument, that God exists, does not work, because there is not a clear definition of what it really means to exist, and his overall statement is hopelessly vague. In Anselm’s Proslogion, Anselm discusses the key elements in his argument about why “God is which nothing greater can be thought” (Anselm, Proslogion,7). Anselm begins his ontological argument by insisting that one cannot imagine a God that is greater, and that even non-believers have some conception of the western God. Anselm argues that even though non- believers do not believe that God exist, they do have an understanding of God in their mind, so that means that God exist in reality. Anselm then concludes that since they have
In this essay, the author
- Argues that anselm's ontological argument, that god exists, does not work because there is not a clear definition of what it really means to exist.
- Concludes that anselm's argument that god exists does not work, because exist has many interpretations, and one of them is problematic for his beliefs.
482 wordsRead More - The Argument Of St Anselm's Argument For The Existence Of Godanalytical essayArguments against St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God St. Anselm begins with a definition of God, argues that an existent God is superior to a non-existent God and concludes that God must exist in reality, for his non-existence would contradict the definition of God itself. The argument does not seem plausible to an unbiased person, even at the very first reading. It seems as if not all aspects of the question under scrutiny have been considered. The basic assumption, on which the entire argument stands, that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined can seem doubtful to a person who doubts the existence of God, for if one doubts that there is a being than which no greater can be conceived, then he may also be sceptical if any person has thoughts about the same being, whose existence itself is doubtful.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that st. anselm's ontological argument for the existence of god does not seem plausible to an unbiased person, even at the very first reading.
- Explains st. anselm's argument is based on the superiority of an existent god over a non-existent god. kant argues that existence should not count towards the perfection of any being, be it the greatest being.
- Argues that it is controversial whether existence is a general class that can be categorized into existence in the mind and exist in reality or if there are multiple levels of existence.
- Explains that if one considers the argument to be correct, one can prove either absurd conclusions or such which contradict the indisputable realities of everyday life. gaunilo of marmoutiers proved the existence or feasibility of building a tunnel through the centre of the earth.
- Argues that there is no strong reason to support the belief that the creation of this world is the most marvellous achievement anyone can have.
- Argues that the coherence of non-existence and creation has not been stressed out. it is difficult to imagine of a nonexistent being creating an existing entity.
- Explains that it is controversial whether the nature of a non-existent being's disabilities is the same as that of an existent
- Argues that the creation of a real universe contradicts oppy's premise of non-existent being, or leads to more controversial questions on the existence of the universe itself.
- Argues that if a non-existent being can have the most marvellous achievement of creating the universe, one is left with no reason to think that nonexistence is disability.
826 wordsRead More - The Ontological Argument: Anselm And Descartesanalytical essayIntro Throughout this essay, a question will present itself as to if the ontological argument can be accepted. To accomplish the task at hand, we shall analyze; firstly, the ontological argument from both Anselm and Descartes. Secondly, we shall discuss the argument for the existence of Fido, and why it does and does not look reasonable (which will answer (i)). Afterwards, questions (ii) and (iii) will be answered, followed by a rejection of the ontological argument from Gaunilo, and then an argument in the defence of the ontological argument from the Internet.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the ontological argument from anselm and descartes, then discusses fido's existence, and why it does and does not look reasonable.
- Explains the first ontological argument for god's existence, which was proposed by anselm. beings can exist in the mind or in reality or both.
- Compares descartes' ontological argument for god's existence to that of anselm.
- Explains that the monotheist belief is that god is the greatest being, and therefore nothing can be greater than god.
- Analyzes how kant's critique of the ontological argument was a reason for the argument to be rejected.
- Explains that the ontological argument has been abandoned due to its critiques, the first of which came against anselm by a monk named gaunilo.
- Explains that while kant's criticism of the ontological argument is mostly accepted, there are still a few who have defended it.
- Concludes that the ontological argument should be rejected due to kant's critique and fido-ism, which contradicts itself.
- Explains that the proof laid out for the existence of fido is reasonable in a sense.
1260 wordsRead More - Anselm Ontological Argumentanalytical essayShort Essay #2 In Chapter 2 of the Proslogion, Anselm presents his famous ontological argument for the existence of God. This argument can be formally summarized into five premises. The first premise that Anselm presents is “you exist, as we believe. ”(Proslogion, Ch.2)
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how anselm presents his famous ontological argument for the existence of god in chapter 2 of the proslogion.
- Analyzes how gaunilo objects anselm's statements by formulating his own argument about a perfect island.
- Explains that gaunilo's objection had flaws, but his argument was successful in countering anselm’s claims. it is flawed because it is not true.
357 wordsRead More - A Philoshpical Approach to Proving the Existence of Godanalytical essayThe Ontological Argument, which argues from a definition of God’s being to his existence, is the first type of argument we are going to examine. Since this argument was founded by Saint Anslem, we will be examining his writings. Saint Anslem starts by defining God as an all-perfect being, or rather as a being containing all conceivable perfections. Now if in addition of possessing all conceivable perfections t...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the question of god's existence has been debated through the history of man, with philosophers from socrates to immanuel kant weighing in on the debate.
- Explains the difference between philosophy of religion and theology. revealed and natural theology use human reasoning to explain the divine.
- Explains the teleological argument, or the argument from design, which starts by saying that the universe exhibits some type of purpose or order, and draws the conclusion that a supreme, intelligent being must be responsible for this order.
- Analyzes how richard dawkin claims that the critics of evolution have misunderstood the concept of cumulative selection.
- Argues that kant's argument that existence is a characteristic is the same as the ontological.
- Analyzes how bertrand russell's critique of the argument does it the most damage. he believes that the contingency argument rests on a misconception of what an explanation is and does.
- Explains that emil fackenheim's views are derived from certain ideas of the jewish philosopher martin buber.
- Analyzes the ontological argument, which argues from a definition of god’s being to his existence.
- Analyzes how paley concludes the watch analogy with the assumption that no intelligent person would assume that the pieces were just a random combination of nature.
- Analyzes saint thomas aquinas' argument about the existence of the universe to god as its cause, creator, or explanation.
- Analyzes how locke tries to counter this by saying that anyone who denies the conclusion of an eternal being is committed to the absurdity that things came into existence from nothing
- Explains that critics of the causal argument are committed to the idea that no matter how far back one goes in a causal series one will never find something without beginning.
- Argues that biblical faith is empirically verifiable and nothing can refute it. fackenheim is misled by the ambiguity of certain statements, such as "destroy" and "test".
4011 wordsRead More - Ontological Argument Essayanalytical essayWhat Anselm also didn’t cover was the fact of God being a Personal God. When Anselm came up with the line of reasoning known as the Ontological Argument. His argument provides no place or a need for the perfect being to be personal. Which is a big deal being a christian, believing in Inc...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that anselm believed that if a being was perfect by definition, then it would not be perfect. the ontological argument is based on the idea that god must exist.
- Analyzes how anselm's ontological argument proves there needs to be an existent perfect being to have a perfect being, but there are several flaws in this argument.
- Explains that anselm didn't cover the fact of god being a personal god. kant pointed out that what this demonstrates is deism.
- Analyzes how anselm approaches his reasoning with the classic western teaching of divine simplicity. god is viewed as completely actual and has no unrealized potentialities.
- Concludes that the nature of the supreme being must avoid absurdity. love and justice that humans experience must function in the same was as being does in general.
- Analyzes how anselm got the source of these conceptions of perfect being from the concept of "divine exemplarism," a teaching form similar to platonic teachings.
- Explains how anselm knew that the human intellect's forms corresponded to a supreme being, which are no different from the created forms.
- Explains that the perfect conception of god is only that of understanding not in reality. if there is a perfect being, he must exist in real life.
- Concludes that the formulation of the argument from a metaphysical assumption and both philosophical and theological argument takes its false standpoint that builds up an entire edifice on assumptions that weren't questioned back in anselms' day.
796 wordsRead More - Anselm God's Existenceanalytical essayAnselm's second contention guarantees that God is endless, boundless, by or in time and in this way has important presence and is an essential being. Anselm contends that it is smarter to be a vital being than an unexpected being, a being that relies upon different things for its reality i.e. having a reason/end since this would eventually constrain your energy. He clarifies that God must be an important being on account of if God exists as an unexpected being we could envision more noteworthy, hence God would not be that than which no more noteworthy can be considered. A being which can't be imagined not to exist must be more prominent than one that can be considered not to exist. Anselm at that point clarifies it would be a self logical inconsistency
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how anselm's second contention guarantees that god is endless, boundless, by or in time and in this way has important presence and is an essential being.
256 wordsRead More - The Great Conversation By Norman Melchertanalytical essayThe Benedictine monk and Archbishop of Canterbury Anselm endeavors to prove an ontological, or existential, argument for the presence of what he referred to as "God." He begins this pursuit by giving the subject of his attention a description summed up in the words "That, than which no greater can be conceived." The author of The Great Conversation a Historical introduction to Philosophy, Norman Melchert believes that the formulation of this designation shows a desire of Anselm to not have limits imposed by mankind's meager mental faculties upon his "God." Melchert also proposes that Anselm's carefully worded descriptor is rejecting mankind's ability to understand "a positive conception of God."
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how benedictine monk and archbishop of canterbury anselm endeavors to prove an ontological, or existential, argument for the presence of what he referred to as "god." norman melchert believes that the formulation of this designation shows a desire
- Opines that anselm's designation is clinically sterile due to its clinical nature. why would a person whose preoccupation relies so heavily on faith permit logic?
174 wordsRead More - St. Anselm's Perspective On The God Questionanalytical essaySt. Anselm’s Perspective on the God Question St. Anselm begins his defense of the existence of God with several simple premises. First, he defines God as the highest conceivable being, “that than which no greater being can be conceived.” Next, Anselm supposes that it is greater to exist in reality than it is to exist in understanding alone. Any being, action, or theory that exists solely in one’s mind is of less value than that which exists outside of the mind. Therefore, because God is already accepted as being the greatest conceivable entity, God must exist in reality and not only consciousness, as if God existed in understanding alone, any entity that existed in reality would be greater than God, “assuredly that, than which nothing greater
In this essay, the author
- Explains st. anselm's defense of the existence of god with several simple premises.
- Analyzes how gaunilo criticizes anselm's justification as lackluster, failing to prove the existence of god.
260 wordsRead More - Argument Essay On Ontological Argumentanalytical essayOver the years, there have been various interpretations given on what Descartes really meant in his ontological argument. However, most of given interpretations only examines the simple meaning of existence but Descartes arguments looks at existence in relation to the perfection of God. In short, what Descartes is claiming is that there is no any other way that he can examine the context of G...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the ontological argument has its major foundations on the words of desecrates that are clearly spelled out in the fifth meditation.
- Analyzes how descartes' ontological argument differs from st. anselm's model for the majority of conventional deductions. the core of god is confined in the idea of existence.
- Analyzes how descartes' ontological argument focuses on existence in relation to the perfection of god. he claims that any idea that an individual has on god must reflect this need.
- Explains that descartes depicts necessary existence as an ontological requirement or perpetual as well as the unconditioned existence.
- Analyzes how descartes' variation between dependent and important features is significant because he refers to either dependent or necessary being instead of simply referring to plain existence.
- Explains that the ontological argument has received a fair share of objections over time. gaunilo marmoutier argued that there must be something wrong with it.
- Explains that if the ontological argument is functional, then the argument for the existence of the ideal island is also functional.
- Explains that gaunilo's claim of an ideal island is unrealistic because it is a perfect island with numerous palm trees and exotic beaches.
- Explains that kant's objection to the ontological argument is based on the belief that the existent god is greater than the one that is non-existent.
- Opines that the objection presented by kant nullifies the ontological argument on the existence of god.
1014 wordsRead More