Student success depends on the teachers love of the material and a willingness to convey that love and knowledge to the students. However, when content matters more than anything else, teachers are sidetracked from using methods or strategies that enhance student learning. This hurts students and faculty as well because neither are reaching their full potential. Some teachers think the best way to improve their teaching is to develop their content knowledge. When teachers have this outlook on teaching they end up with high levels of knowledge, but do not have the instructional methods and strategies needed to relay their knowledge to their students.
After reading the section “Philosophies of Education,” I believe that learning, learners, and teaching needs to to be interactive, that students learn best when their lessons are active, challenging and relevant in their world and that they learn through experience. Teaching would include less textbooks, more hands-on activities and the use of technology in the classroom. To be an effective teacher, we need to understand how children learn and realize that not all will fit into one mold and we shouldn 't expect them to either, they need to think for themselves and draw their own conclusions. Some teaching strategies may work great for one student in the classroom yet may not work for all. Therefore, our teaching and the curriculum used
I think school district need to do a better job at training school leaders get the proper training and use teacher evaluations to benefit both the teachers and students. Teacher evaluations are very important. Most of the time, they have a negative feeling attached to them. Some teachers view evaluations as a way of them getting written up for what they are not doing and not as a way of growing and improving to help them teach their students. This also depends on how the principals frame and do teacher evaluations.
Rather, they gathered knowledge on their own, which might help improving retention. Reading through the literature on this type of learning, it becomes clear that many people believe that self-directed learning is a better approach than the traditional, teacher-directed learning. However, this approach is not necessarily a good fit for everybody. Self-directed learning is better for students who are willing to take initiative and are interested in the subject, while traditional learning is better for people who are not interested in learning a subject. In the traditional approach to teaching, the teachers are sole source of knowledge.
Education nowadays is thought as attending schools. Studies prove that not everyone learns the same way. Therefore, by approaching a topic using different learning styles, this may help more students become successful.Keeping students engaged in activities may help the students to develop their academics, this is better than having them sitting all the time doing unchanged tasks that would decrease their morale and demotivates them to learn. Students need more tactile resources to develop their analytical thinking, and they also need life experience and self-reliance to deal with life in these days. Most of us feel that education is that education is the most important aspect, and following that way of thinking, we'll end up thinking that formal education as schools and universities must be the one's ultimate target,of course it is important but it is not the final aspect.The true meaning of education is misunderstood by a lot of people, it is the understanding and using the knowledge we have to differentiate not about studying and memorizing by heart and then writing this in a form of answers in examinations.
These facts make an educator’s task much more difficult, because what teaches and motivates some students does not work for others. I believe most students want to have a reason or purpose to learn something new, and they want to feel that this new information will be relevant to their life somehow. Teachers must remind students why they need this new information and how to use it. I believe students want to feel that their needs and ideas are being considered; they do not want to feel controlled by the teacher. Ultimately, if an educator tries to understand each student’s learning style, ability, and interests, that teacher will be more capable of imposing and relaying information to that individual.
For example, teachers should have an innate desire to want to help and have an impact on a child’s life. Teaching is an incredibly important profession that is most certainly not easy, despite what others may think. It requires a great deal of patience and caring in order to be able to communicate with students and connect with them on a personal level. For this reason, first and foremost, if a teacher does not care about the success and future of his/her students, they cannot be a great teacher, because such disinterest will reveal itself and become apparent through his/her instruction. If one doesn’t truly care about the students, then they do not have sufficient reason to put effort in to their lessons and teaching, which would in turn be a great misfortune on the children’s behalf.
This theory is motivated by aiming for a goal and it being central to everyday life. As a teacher, your goal is to educate students and help shape them for the future. Sometimes, this task may be tough, especially if they are lecturing in a low-income, inner-city school. Because of the low budget of some schools, they may not get the advancements and opportunities that other schools may receive, as well as troubled students themselves not being motivated to learn. The difficulties to help educate this population could question your overall goal to making the education system better.
On the other hand, a student who is intrinsically motivated will need to sincerely enjoy the task at hand or lose the desire to partake in that assignment (Seifert & Sutton, 2009). Individuals can both create and receive knowledge as some wisdom is innate and some is learned (Case, 1996). Teachers can use this to their advantage by giving students opportunities to expand their minds through discovery activities or by allowing them to figure out the intricacies of certain topics by giving them the tools to develop their own minds (Seifert & Sutton, 2009). An example ... ... middle of paper ... ...at a later time. Repetition of ideas and concepts is also not always as beneficial to learners as discovering ideas.
Uses and Consequences of the Self Fulfilling Prophecy Abstract The Self Fulfilling Prophecy is a concept that should be quite familiar in the classroom, yet is still a mystery to many teachers today. Learning to properly use this idea will ultimately result in higher student scores directly, and on a higher level, will cause students to model the expectations of the teacher and expect much of themselves. This will set students up for highly successful autonomous learning. However, ignorance or improper use of the SFP does not stimulate learning, but may inhibit accomplishment. Teachers must strive to achieve a better understanding of this “Pygmalion Effect” to create a powerful learning environment.