Essay Comparing The Crucible And Red Scare

1243 Words3 Pages

Witch Hunts Thru the Ages Two events separated by hundreds of years. Both sent the public into a paranoid state leading to a literal and figurative witch hunt. Both had a group of people fueling the public paranoia. Some say their was no correlation but the evidence and similarities are too much. The red scare and the crucible are two in events in history with uncanny similarities that prove prejudice has always been around only redirected to a new target. Where there is fear there is paranoia, fear is a powerful tool with the wrong person at the steering wheel innocent people can get hurt. If people are scared enough they can turn and is the most untouchable person falls the fear grows that they might come for you. “Believe me Mr. Nurse …show more content…

Arthur Miller was brought in by the HUAC under suspicion of being a communist. He was convicted for contempt of court. While writing the Crucible he might have been mad that he was convicted leading him to be biased about the committee. Arthur Miller did change some of the events maybe he changed them to be more extravagant and more similar to those of the red scare leading to a easy connection. What if the HUAC made a mistake trying to protect are country and thinking of life from the treats of the communist. They did find real communist spies in our country plotting against the United States of America they did lift the charge later. In a fit of anger Maybe Arthur Miller writes a biased play and I write an article based mostly upon a biased play. He did say he changed events like John Proctor's affair which is one of the main factors for the start of the Witch Trials. f knows what else he changed about the play. “By this time I was sure, John Proctor had bedded Abigail, who had to be dismissed most likely to appease Elizabeth.” (Miller 1096). Arthur Miller himself says the affair wasn’t proven more of a excellent plot point to put bad blood between Elizabeth and

Open Document