Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of censorship
Negative effects of censorship
Negative effects of censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of censorship
I. All Literature should be publiclly accessible, as well as in schools A. First Digital Information 1. Include Teenink.com information "Against Banning Books" 2.Elborate on "Against Banning Book", including classic banned books B. Second Digital Information 1. Include theodysseyonline.com "Why We Should Never Ban Book" 2. Relate to the Article with personal experiences at school, quoting the article II. Banning books in general denies our Youth to a narrow mindset with 'proper' and 'acceptable' according to overprotective adults . A. First Digital Information 1. Include LA Times "Tennessee Mother complains about Henrietta Lacks" 2. Use quotes of mother and use satire, poke fun B. Second Digital Information 1. Present Information from Gawker.com "Parent calls cop to stop kids from handing out banned book" …show more content…
Again, use quotes from the article and use Satire. Use Personal thoughts on over protective Mothers and 'shielding' children. III. 'Controversial' topics such as past or current cultural controversies hould be shown in books A. First Print Information 1. Begin with excerpts from Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture 2. Go along with how said information should be made available to the public B. Second Print Information 1. Finish off the last bit of provided information with excerpts from Banned in the Media: A Reference Guide to Censorship in the Press, Motion Pictures, Broadcasting, and the Internet 2. Point out US Bans on books as well as landmark incidents in books that are banned and should be exposed to the public to never forget these tragedies Conclusion: All in all, Books should be made and not censored just for it's 'vulgarity' or 'socially obscenity' they should be written, manufactured, just like any regular book. Without them, important values and information could not be available for future
She starts her article by describing her first contact with censorship and continues to talk about her experiences as an author with writing her own books being barred. She takes account of her personal views on how to handle topics people feel should be forbidden from children. She also adds that books should open up conversation between parents and their children. Blume states that we should not let fear be a deciding factor on what is right or wrong but rather be informed and educated about the things we fear. She also said , if applied, censorship is a personal choice and government should not decide what is suitable and what is not suitable for everyone else’s children.
Books are banned for many reasons but more times than not it is because of the sensitive information found within the novel that agitates the reader. As long as people have been able to develop their own opinions, others have sought to prevent them from sharing. At some point in time, every idea has ultimately become objectionable to someone. The most frequently challenged and most visible targets of such objection are the very books found in classrooms and public libraries. These controversial novels teach lessons that sometimes can be very sensitive to some but there is much more to challenged books than a controversial topic. What lies within these pages is a wealth of knowledge, such as new perspectives for readers, twisting plots, and expressions that are found nowhere else. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird, contains references to rape, racial content, and profanity that have caused many to challenge the novel in the first place. The book was banned from countless
Foerstel, Herbert N. Banned in the U.S.A.: a Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1994. Print.
Number one, as I said: quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learned from the interaction of the first two”(84-85). Books are where people get their information from, banning books basically means the censorship of information.
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
Banned Books Week.” Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read American Library Association, 21st Sept. 2005. Web.02 March 2016
Although some may say that certain books contain graphic/violent content, banning such books is not an effective method to prevent young children from being exposed to such content, and therefore is unnecessary. One person that harbors such beliefs is Christina Healey. In her article “Book Banning can be Justified in Some Cases,” she argues that in some cases, book banning is...
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
Books that have shaped America are slowly starting to disappear. Many of the previous social norms have fallen out of fashion, and because of this reason numerous books are beginning to become banned. Blasphemy, racism, sex, and violence are all ethical reasons for books to be censored.
The majority of students these days do not read books on a daily basis. But the proud few that do will know about the banned books. An example of a banned book would be Speak. The book should not have been banned for young adults in high school or adults outside of school. The book has reasons why it should not be banned.
Baldassarro, Wolf. "Banned Books Awareness." Banned Books Awareness. World.edu, 31 Mar. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2013. (3)
There are many reasons behind book banning and what it stands for, that make a case for book censorship. One main advantage of book banning is that it is protecting children from inappropriate content. A book is usually banned because it contains material that is deemed unfit for minors. Most parents and schools do n...
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
When controversial topics are mentioned, literature is probably not the first, or most pressing, one that comes to mind. But books can and have been highly controversial ground for schools, libraries, and governments around the world and throughout history. Literature successfully pushes boundaries and comfort levels and has done so since the beginning of printed texts. Lots of sources agree that, “Books that span all eras and topics and are aimed at the young and the old are frequently objected to and challenged by many” (Olson 1). Because of this, on all levels, books are banned yearly because of content and language. However, in a highly technological and digital world, book banning is not an effective way to safeguard the minds of the young.
What do books like Harry Potter, looking for Alaska, and The Hunger Games all have in common? These books have all been heavily challenged by the banned book committee. Children in schools face the problem that reading material is slowly becoming a list of what not to read. Parents fear the topics written in some books are things that children shouldn’t face at that moment. The world is slowly cutting out important pieces of literature to protect young people from seeing the brutality around them. Banning books should stop, because we are only harming the creativity that is born within a student when they read.