Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
effect of social media on education
the impact social media among children
effect of social media on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: effect of social media on education
Are we really Multitaskers? I know that I am far being labeled as a multitasker and I find that a good thing. Many people believe they are cable of doing more thing than one at once. Multitasking is more difficult than we believe, Can the brain actually be two places at once? I re-evaluated myself thinking I could do many different events at the same time. For example, trying to do two different subjects for school won’t work out for most of us. Humans that focus on one event at a time instead of trying to multitask will be more successful. The brain cannot be two places at the same time. Multitasking will prevent students from learning to the best of their ability. Many people believe they are good at multitasking, when in reality the brain …show more content…
I often find myself focusing on one thing more than the other. For example, trying to watch TV and do homework doesn’t work for me. I begin starring at the TV losing focus on my work and my attention is directed to what I am watching. In addition to that I will lose track of time, work that shouldn’t take that long to finish ends up taking an endless amount of time. With regards to watching TV I can’t express enough how many times I pick up my phone and check what is going on Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, and in my messages. My phone has to be my biggest distraction, it is a bad habit that I am trying to work on and break. I’ve tried turning my phone off while doing homework, but that wasn’t successful at all. Another example would be me trying to do homework while talking to people or listening to music. While trying to talk to people and work I will find myself typing what I am hearing. My mind is so focused on what the person is saying to me that I will eventually type it and have to revise it once I check my paper. While doing school work I try to avoid multitasking at all cost. I tend to remain focused for a longer duration while concentrating on one thing at a …show more content…
His system was based off four different quadrants that were titled Urgent & Important, Not Urgent & Important, Urgent & Not Important, and, Not urgent & Not Important. Quadrant 1 is Urgent & Important and that deals with crises, emergencies, and assignments that have due dates. That quadrant has to be the most important one, that is where the main priorities should be located in the matrix. Quadrant 2 is Not Urgent & important, I believe this is the quadrant that we need to live with in. Some examples of Quadrant 2 would be exercising, training, sleeping, and eating healthy. These are the aspects of live that aren’t urgent but, are still important on a daily basis. Nobody is forcing me to exercise, train, sleep, and eat healthy I do it for self-improvement and self-growth. The third Quadrant is regarding to Urgent & Not important, stating that it is urgent to someone else but, we could care less about it. For example, a meeting that has nothing to do with us or a family member complaining about their life. Sure we care about our families but, if I am getting phone calls, emails, or text from them just complaining it doesn’t mean much to me. I am not good with advice and never have been. Quadrant 3 is a waste of time to me most of the things that aren’t important to us. Finally, Quadrant 4 Not
Today we live in a society where everything is seconds away from us. With the advances and affordability of quality technology, you would be hard pressed to find someone without a smartphone, laptop, or tablet, possibly all at the same time. Because of the accessibility we find that, in our tech-savvy culture, multitasking has not just become an art form of sorts, but rather an expectation. In the article “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend sets out to explore the idea that although multitasking appears to show productivity, it could be doing the opposite. Throughout her article, Tugend uses studies done by neurologists and psychologists to show how in a world that sees multitasking as an expectation it has actually made us less efficient. She proposes, through studies, that although you might be working on multiple tasks it is as if you’re playing tennis with multiple balls (Tugend, 725).
People often feel as if they don’t have much time. To solve this, many people multi-task to complete several tasks at once. The definition of multitasking by most people would be, “performing two or more tasks at once,” which is generally the idea. The definition of multitasking according to Merriam-Webster is the performance of multiple tasks at one time. Multitasking often is a complex process and can use different parts of the brain, for example, a telephone operator needs to be able to talk to a client while working on the computer and that requires the occipital and temporal lobe of the brain.
On May 3, 2013, The New York Times had posted an article discussing the poor effects that can happen to the brain if you are multitasking and being interrupted. There have been claims from numerous Universities suggesting that multitasking can deaden our brain. Sullivan and Thompson give us the insinuated results that if one wishes to accomplish two or more tasks at once, they will not reach the maximum capacity of success that the brain offers to them. Research on this topic has been minimal so the authors decide to investigate more on this epidemic (Sullivan and Thompson).
Performing well in at certain tasks and retaining information both require a high level of attention. Multitasking requires that this attention be divided amongst different tasks. As a result, the some of the attention used for a certain task must now be used for other tasks, which affects the factors needed to complete it. Referring to an experiment that was discussed earlier, Wieth and Burns (2014) stated that even with the reward, the promise of incentive could not override the limits of people’s attention. Retaining information requires undivided attention. The key word is ‘undivided.’ According to this experiment, it is nearly impossible to have the same high level of focus while working on multiple tasks that a person would while working on one task. Once someone has reached the end of their attention span, their performance begins to falter. In a final experiment involving media multitasking and attention, Ralph, Thomson, Cheyne, and Smilek (2014) stated that multitasking can lead to mind wandering and lapses in attention, which distracts people from their tasks. These results show that once their attention is divided, it can lead to distractions and difficulty completing different tasks. It is difficult to complete one assignment while focusing on several others at the same time. Multitasking affects the attention needed for a task, which can affect everything
As human beings, it is becoming more of a second nature to us to multi-task. As the world is technologically advancing more and more every day, there are becoming more distractions. Social-media is flourishing, reality TV show ratings are going up, and humans even unintentionally check their phones every two minutes. In this day of age, multi-tasking is proving to promote inefficiency rather than productivity.
He started his essay by two different scenario with different mindsets. Glenn explores the circumstances of multitasking that student do in classroom. Many students think that they can multitask as the Glenn puts in the article “From text messages to the lecture to Facebook to note taking and back again may walk away from the class” (Bullet 3). Students are assure that they are getting everything the professor says, but studies shows that students miss a lot of important information because of this illusion. Glenn includes many professors’ views on multitasking with varies thoughts on how they choose different methods to deliver their information to student eliminating any obstacle. Clifford Nass the professor of psychology at Stanford University did an experiments on multitaskers. He found that multitaskers did worse on the experiment than the students who were very focused on one task at a time. Glenn also includes the views of Professor David E. Myer. According to professor Myer even a paper and pen will also distract the student. Myers says that if students are start taking notes, they will definitely miss the important information on the topic (bullet
Internet research such as blogs and unofficial sites were valid in providing a great deal of information relevant to my topic that could assist in answering the research question however, they were all generally unreliable due to many not having an author listed and the ones that did had no qualifications in either childhood obesity or screen time. Blogs can be seen as bias as many are generally based entirely on the authors point of view and opinions.
Unfortunately I do not own many multi-tasking skills. I enjoy and handle things on a more productive level. I have researched several websites regarding multitasking and our brain, listen to what Sanjuy Gupta Chief Medical respondent has to say about this issue. Specifically speaking the brain does not multi-task, for example some people who try t drive and text can are known to have accidents while even in traffic. the brain focus on one task at a time. You are not actually doing both activities at one time says Dr. Sanjuy, you are now diverting from one activity to the next, your brain has more than part. You don 't focus as much as you should nor do as good of a job as normally. Task should have your undivided attention to do your best. Dr Sanjuy discussed that multi-tasking can even be a genetic gift, which I find astonishing (Sanjuy Gupta 2016). Travis Bradberry a doctor discovered multi-tasking causes brain damage. Travis Bradberry, wrote the book Emotional Intelligence 2.0 and the cofounder of TalentSmart. I agree with the findings from the research studies
Multitasking can be detrimental to learning, and students should start to refocus on their studies in an effort to reap the full benefits of a college education. There are several ways to undertake this, including building up to working longer periods of time spent on one task and putting aside technology altogether. Another method that helps students is to learn to meditate and becoming aware of when they are being distracted. Once one has better focus, he or she can refine the use of his or her time on projects by doing a productivity purge. If these methods are employed students can benefit by sharpened focus and more effectual use of their time not just in college but throughout their
Most of the top distractions fall under one of three areas: cell phones, interaction with passengers, and reaching for or using items. Fortunately, there are things you can do to prevent yourself from allowing these things to become a problem for you.
I know i’m gonna struggle on that threw all my years in high school and college. Even when i get a job it’s gonna be hard to stay on task once things start getting piled up. If i got rid of all distractions that would help. I have to concentrate on 1 thing at a time. Staying on task and not turning my work in on time goes hand in hand. If i have a planner or when everything is due that would help me turn in all my work in on time and stay on task by giving me the things i need to do. If I want to be a therapist I can not get distracted. I have to learn when to put certain things to the side. I can get distracted very easily. If I learn how to put things to the side I won't get distracted as
It is an interesting point and supported by the above claim that we can train our brains to become heavy or light multitaskers. Clifford Nass states, the issue is not about multitasking on related items, but rather when we are writing email, watching YouTube and on posting on Twitter about another social event (The Myth of Multitasking). “It's extremely healthy for your brain to do integrative things. It's extremely destructive for your brain to do non-integrative things” (The Myth of
Strayer, D. L., & Watson, J. M. (2012). Supertaskers and the multitasking brain. Scientific American Mind, 23(1), 22-29.
According to The Dangers of Multitasking, the downsides of multitasking outweigh its upsides (Davies 39). Multitasking students can miss many necessary information that they really need to pass tests and understand lessons when they multitask during the lectures, which causes them to get a low grade on their tests. “Many experienced multitaskers have experienced an unexpected thing when, for example, their e-mail service was disabled for a period of time. They discovered that they were actually more productive during that period of time” (Multitasking 758). That means that multitaskers are more productive when they concentrate on one task; so students will do better on tests and in school in general, if they quit or cut back on multitasking during classes. Moreover, “The human brain works more efficiently on a single task and for sustained rather than intermitted or alternating periods of time” (Multitasking 758). So, this does not mean...
“Over-focusing” on some things causes the deficit of attention to other things: my clothes, people and environment around, other actions that are done automatically. Automatic actions are often made with ridiculous errors that affect my work and my self-esteem -> confidence. I can wear shoes of different pairs, or finding an elegant solution I can make stupid mistakes in the formatting of my program, and because of that nothing work. I need better manage such situations. Not sure how, however.