Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Australia treat asylum seekers essay
The concept of immigration to Australia
Asylum seekers in Australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Australia treat asylum seekers essay
English Communications Study 2
Oral Presentation
Transcript
Introduction
As a part of my English communications study I have chosen to explore the various social and political issues regarding asylum seekers in Australia. Firstly I would like to clarify the term asylum seekers, or as they are more commonly referred to: ‘boat people’.
Definition of an Asylum Seeker: An asylum seeker is any person who has unwillingly fled their country of origin and is unable return due to facing persecution because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, political opinion or involvement in a particular social or political group.
I ask you now to imagine such a life. It is impossible for us to imagine having to flee our homes and family simply because our beliefs or lifestyle are not deemed suitable. Furthermore, paying thousands of dollars to travel across treacherous oceans in shabby boats. The fact that asylum seekers are prepared to remain locked up in detention centres and be deprived of their freedom must surely tell us of the horrific circumstances from which they have fled. ******** PUT IN CLOSING PARAGRAPH.
Myths
Secondly, I would like to clarify some of the widely accepted myths regarding asylum seekers in Australia.
1. We Are Being Swamped: Less than 16,000 (15,800) people claim asylum in Australia each year. While this may seem like a lot, Australia receives less than two percent of the total asylum claims made globally.
2. Most Asylum Seekers Arrive by Boat: Recent wars have increased the number of asylum seekers arriving by boat; however, an average of thirteen asylum seekers arrives through Australian airports each day. Asylum seeker transport by air is ninety percent more likely than by boat. Australia is simple not being f...
... middle of paper ...
...ing Asylum Seekers to War, 2014).
Conclusion
Liberty is a fundamental human right, recognized in major human rights instruments to which Australia is a party. People who are held in detention are particularly vulnerable to violations of their human rights.
Though Australia is perceived as a democratic country whose government is open to public scrutiny, this belief is erroneous. The Australian Government’s apathy towards asylum seekers is neglectful of the fundamental human right to liberty and a sense of safety. Australia will need to overturn these inhumane laws to move forward as a country. If you believe Australia is a country of equality and acceptance then you are deluding yourself.
The detainees are indeed in the dark about their future.
Idiot Opinions with Verse of National Anthem
‘For those who’ve come across the seas, we’ve boundless plains to share…’
I, along with many other people believe that as a human we deserve Human Rights, regardless of who we are of what our background is, where we live, what we look like, what we think or what we believe in. However this is not the case. In Australia we are believed to be a multicultural community and a diverse society. Nevertheless the way Asylum Seeker and Refugees are being treated is
Australian people should be opening arms to the Face of Mercy and to the Refugees that are
One of Australia’s biggest moral wrongdoings that has been continued to be overlooked is the providing of safety for refugees. Under the article 14, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. It is not in anyway, shape or form illegal to seek asylum from maltreatment. Australia is obliged under international law to: offer protection, give support, ensure that any individual is not sent back unwillingly to the country of their origin. A report made by
Phillips, J. (2011), ‘Asylum seekers and refugees: What are the facts?’, Background note, Parliamentry library, Canberra.
Although, asylum seekers and refugees are given a few options if they feel as though their rights are being breached, like they can apply to tribunals and courts to view their visa related decisions, they can also make a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about their human rights being breached in immigration detention centres, yet they do not have control over who enters the country, the government is not obliged to comply with the recommendations that are made. Although the government had made few attempts to comply with the human right obligations towards asylum seekers and refugees by introducing new policies and prioritising the safety of the children in these detention camps, there are currently still many breaches towards their rights that the government continues to adapt, therefore they are still constituting a breach of international law
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
Since the time of federation the Aboriginal people have been fighting for their rights through protests, strikes and the notorious ‘day of mourning’. However, over the last century the Australian federal government has generated policies which manage and restrained that of the Aboriginal people’s rights, citizenships and general protection. The Australian government policy that has had the most significant impact on indigenous Australians is the assimilation policy. The reasons behind this include the influences that the stolen generation has had on the indigenous Australians, their relegated rights and their entitlement to vote and the impact that the policy has had on the indigenous people of Australia.
Asylum seeker issue is a complex and continuing struggle between the heart and the head. It will continue to haunt us as long as Australia shines to be an oasis of space, peace and prosperity in a global sea of overcrowding and escalating suffering.
The asylum seekers have the education and survival skills to survive in middle of the outback whereas Australians do not and have not been equipped with those skills. This was stated in the film at the end when three Australian men were sitting at the pub wearing singlets and a flannel, a typical stereotype of what Australian men wear. The three men were having drinks and watching the news about the refugees surviving in the desert, one of the pub men said “____________________________”. This has represented that men in our country wouldn’t be able survive on our land with limited food and little water in the middle of the desert. This demonstrates how determined the refugees to survive in Australia rather than being deported back to their countries. The skills that one asylum seekers, Yousiff Al-Samer showed during the film was how determined he was to get the run down, broke car to work. In order for him and the other two men to survive he used his engineering skills to be able to get the car running. The three asylum seekers ability to survive in the Australian land, desert and a place where ‘real’ Australians live means that these men have deserved the legitimate title of Australians compared to actual Australians who won’t have the skills and education to be able to survive in our
So what does this mean about our Government? Are they scared of the intake of Refugees? If so, what are they scared of? This contradicts the whole purpose of the Government, aren’t Australians meant to put our trust in leaders to make great decisions, hence we have a Government in the first place? Doctrines such as the Just War Doctrine a Catholic based Law, states that the Government should hold the responsibility for the common good. Yet not every country experiences this, and many Refugees have to flee in order for their freedom and to escape from persecution of their own beliefs, religions and human
Today, there are over 65 million refugees in the world. That means that one in every 113 people in the world is a refugee. To many, this number may seem extremely alarming. Many refugees struggle to find a place to resettle. America, along with other developed countries, has often been considered dreamland for these displaced people, making many wanting to get out of their war-torn houses and camps. Refugees immigrating to America have been displaced from their original homes, face frustrating immigration policies, and have difficulties starting a new life in a new land.
There are many oppressive factors that exist in contemporary Canadian society that disadvantages and often alienates refugees. These oppressive factors exist in social, religious, cultural, political, and economic spheres within society. There are many political barriers that exist that oppress and limit the amount of refugees that can safely flee to Canada. An example of political and social barriers that inhibit the admission of refugees is increased border security. Border security has reached a point where it is too difficult for some refugees to safely flee a harmful environment, and this violates international law which outlines that each state has to respect an individual’s right to seek refuge in any nation. Implementing more restrictive
However, the need for commodities would lead these individuals to rely on welfare as a source of income. The law’s placed on these immigrants were so restrictive their lifestyles were very handicapped and they could not afford to live comfortable lives. It became a battle between government officials and the media against these individuals. Ironically, the visas given to them prohibited them from leaving the country even if they wanted to. Despite not liking asylum seekers or immigrants in their country, they would not let them leave (McDonald & Billings,
Overall Australia’s human rights record is of high-quality but is blemished by few human rights violations. Australia has freedom of speech, a corruption-free legal system, legal protection against discrimination, access to secondary education, the right to vote in elections, access to clean water, privacy protection, freedo...
Article 9 states, ‘No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile’. This right is definitely being violated due to asylum seekers are refugees being forcibly detained in Australia’s offshore detention centres. (SafeCom, 2011) There are so many rights that the Australian Government are choosing to ignore. These include torture, the loss of choice and freedom, discrimination and being forced into detention.