Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: espionage in wwii
As children many of us can remember playing games that consisted of hiding and being secret . My favorite game to play as a kid was hide and go-seek. When i was the one seeking i would try to watch where the hider was going just to make it easier for me to win. there was a chance that my opponent would catch me while i was looking at him while he was hiding, but at this age it wouldn't have mattered if he saw me, he/she would probably just call me a cheater. But what if the seeker had to look for something or someone that he knew existed but didn't know what it looked like, so he never knew what or who he was looking for? How would the seeker find this person or thing that he was searching for? And what if the person they were looking for was right in front of them every time and the seeker had no clue about it. The hider could accomplish a lot more if they were right there with the seeker and the seeker had no idea because the hider would always be one step ahead of them and know their every move. This probably sounds a little weird, but this is the ideology of espionage. Espionage is the systematic use of spies to get military or political secrets. A spies goal was to retrieve and gather information while hiding and concealing their identity in the open. Spies would often take on a role that would put them easily accessible to the information they needed to get. So a spy looking to gather information about the government in the White house wouldn't take on a role at Dunkin Donuts. He would probably take on a role of maybe a Custodian at the white house which would put him right near all the information. During war it was extremely important to keep your ideas and routes and movement and your methods a secret so that your oppone... ... middle of paper ... ...s power working in order to gain information for their government and the germans would look for them and seek them but in the end the United States was a step ahead of them. Acts of espionage assisted in defending the allied powers and to be successful in battles. So i believe and its extremely evident that the war would not have been won by the allies if it wasn't for the help of the allied powers. It all came down to deciphering foreign messages and tracking future military attacks and discovering foreign spies. United States espionage played a major role and was an extremely important aspect in winning the war because it basically was the background of the war sort of like the behind the scenes of the war and without behind the scenes activity their would be no activity going on in the forefront. Espionage was what conducted the troops and the future of the war.
Britain had an advantage over Germany in gaining the U.S. as an ally. Although the U.S. had as many as eleven million immigrants with blood ties to the Germans and Austro-Hungarians, they shared close culture, language, and economic ties with the British. The British were also in control of most of the transatlantic cables. Therefore, they had the ability to censor war stories, which hurt the British cause in the eyes of the U.S. They instead sent only the tales of German bestiality. Also, most Americans were anti-German from the beginning because it seemed as if their government was the embodiment of autocracy. Another disadvantage to the Germans was the British interception of a secretly coded message intended for Mexico. This message, when decoded by the British, asked Mexico to join the war on the Central side if the U.S. declared war on Germany. These actions all compiled into a list of reasons why the U.S. should enter the war in Ally support.
“There is one evil I dread, and that is, their spies. I could wish therefore the most attentive watch be kept… I wish a dozen or more honest sensible and diligent men, were employed… in order to question, cross-question, etc., all such persons as are unknown, and cannot give an account of themselves in a straight and satisfactory manner… I think it a matter of importance to prevent these [Tory spies] from obtaining intelligence of our situation. ” – George Washington
World War II was a war that proved to the world the awesome power of the United States. Many events led up to the U.S. involvement in the war, topped off by the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor. Many great people contributed to leading the United State to victory in the war. They include General Douglas MacArthur, General Dwight Eisenhower, and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. World War II also consisted of many major events including Operation Overlord and the U.S. bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Overall the United States played a major role in World War II and displayed their power through strong generals and their initiative and strong leadership in major events.
Aldrich Ames was one of the most notorious spys in United States history, single handily crippling the United States spy network in the Soviet Union, and compromising hundreds of Intelligence Operations around the world. Ames’ impact on the national security of the United States was devastating and the ramifications of his actions can still be felt today in the Intelligence Community. This paper will provide details into the background and the events surrounding Ames’ espionage and subsequent arrest for treason.
Mass production of weapons, strong military with lots of manpower, money from taxes and war bonds, and censorship were important to America during World War II. Keeping the home front with motivated and enthusiastic people is important in making progress towards victory during war. America was able to come together and dominate fascism.
Spies have been around for quite awhile spies even during in the American Civil War. Both the Union and the Confederacy used spies to obtain crucial information even though neither one of them had a formal military intelligence network at the beginning of the war. They both needed spies to collect information about the other side's military movement, number of spies, and what kind of condition the military was in. This would allow the generals to know when to attack or if they should retreat. Spying on the other side would allow them to get an advantage in the war. The spies needed a way to keep secretive and blend into the society. Sometimes they would dress like a farmer and some would hire slaves to collect the information. Believe it or not there was also female spies that would dress like men.
Utilitarianism is consequentialist ethical system that focuses on the results of actions, rather than the actions themselves. Utilitarian ethics, attributed to Jeremy Bentham, also argue that humans are naturally driven to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Therefore, in utilitarian ethics, just actions are those that maximize happiness, utility, and minimize unhappiness. Utilitarian ethics also argue that happiness must be maximized for the greatest number of people, rather than focusing on the individual pursuit of pleasure. Utilitarianisms strengths lie in its societal applications, allowing decision making bodies that benefit large groups, rather than looking purely individualistically. It also offers a stronger justification if one accepts the base principle that happiness is universally better than unhappiness. One of the main difficulties in applying utilitarian ethics is the challenge of quantifying happiness. It is impossible to empirically measure happiness. Utilitarianism also opens itself to hypotheticals that yield unpleasant results. Under pure utilitarianism, if it would increase the safety, and therefore happiness, of a society to torture or kill innocents suspected of a crime, it would follow that such action was ethically just. Subsequent utilitarians have offered more nuanced versions of the hedonic calculus and ideas of rule utilitarianism that look at overall moral rules
While Mill’s utilitarianism was extremely well thought out, it has its limitations. Similarly, preference utilitarianism also has it flaws. Truthfully, moral thinking and judgment cannot have a straightforward answer. The proper guideline of morality most likely rests somewhere in the middle of these and other theories.
...g on someone’s or some group’s rights. So if a few must suffer in order for the needs of the many it can prove very bad because of the moral obligation involving rights in this case are severe. Finally in my reason of finding this theory unattractive, is the fact that utilitarianism seems to view people as vessels of pleasure and pain rather than as people.
According to (Moore & Parker, 2009, p. 441) Utilitarianism is the view that says “if an act will produce more happiness than will alternatives, it is the right thing to do, and if it will produce less happiness, it would be wrong to do it in place of an alternative that would produce more happiness”.
...nd to start off the war shows how a a great power can benefit from a weaker state. Germany then invaded and defeated France, leaving most of the Eurasian continent under the control of the Axis. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 drove America into the war. International organizations such as The League of Nations failed to provide a solution to international conflicts involving Nazi Germany and their goal to regain their lost provinces from World War I.
Many events caused the outbreak of W.W.II, American involvement in W.W.II, and the ending of the war. Nevertheless, there are some events that were more influential in bringing about the start of World War II than others, some events that were more influential in bringing about the United States' involvement in the war than others, and some events were more decisive in the ending of W.W.II. In any case, however, the eighteen events aforementioned events were all immensely significant in their various ways.
As human beings, we often have desires that are not always consistent with yielding the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Utilitarianism would argue that putting one’s own desires first and pursuing one’s own interests is wrong and immoral behavior. While some moral theories acknowledge that pursuing one’s own interests can be morally optional, in Utilitarianism, it is always forbidden (Moral Theory, p. 135). This makes the theory overly demanding because one is constantly forced to consider others. Utilitarians can respond to this objection by challenging the claim that pursuing one’s own desires cannot ever be consistent with the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Certainly there can be times when pursuing one’s own desires is also consistent with producing the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Utilitarians might also point out that moral theories are meant to be demanding because they are teaching individuals how to act morally and acting morally is not always the desirable course of
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory in which determining the rightness or wrongness of action or decision is based on determining whether the greatest benefit or happiness will be provided in the highest or greatest number of population. This simply means that action or decision must be based on the highest amount or number of beneficiary (Martineau, 2006). However, this ethical theory has two major types. First is the “act utilitarianism” and second is the “rule utilitarianism.” Act utilitarianism specifically adh...
As a philosophical approach, utilitarianism generally focuses on the principle of “greatest happiness”. According to the greatest happiness principle, actions that promote overall happiness and pleasure are considered as right practices. Moreover, to Mill, actions which enhance happiness are morally right, on the other hand, actions that produce undesirable and unhappy outcomes are considered as morally wrong. From this point of view we can deduct that utilitarianism assign us moral duties and variety of ways for maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain to ensure “greatest happiness principle”. Despite all of moral duties and obligations, utilitarian perspective have many specific challenges that pose several serious threats which constitute variety of arguments in this essay to utilitarianism and specifically Mill answers these challenges in his work. These arguments can be determinated and analyzed as three crucial points that seriously challenges utilitarianism. The first issue can be entitled like that utilitarian idea sets too demanding conditions as to act by motive which always serves maximizing overall happiness. It creates single criterion about “being motived to maximize overall happiness” but moral rightness which are unattainable to pursue in case of the maximizing benefit principle challenges utilitarianism. Secondly, the idea which may related with the first argument but differs from the first idea about single criterion issue, utilitarianism demands people to consider and measuring everything which taking place around before people practice their actions. It leads criticism to utilitarianism since the approach sees human-beings as calculators to attain greatest happiness principle without considering cultural differ...