Escherichia Coli : Coli And Coli

1024 Words3 Pages

ABSTRACT: Water samples from local ponds and lakes and snow runoff were collected and tested for coliform as well as Escherichia coli. Humans as well as animals come into contact with these areas, some are used for recreational activities such as swimming and some are a source of drinking water for both animals and humans The main goal of this experiment was to see which lakes, snow run off and ponds tested positive for coliform or Escherichia coli and to come up with some reasoning as to why. It was found that the more remote pond with less contact contained the most Escherichia coli. However, another lake that many swim in and use as their drinking water indeed tested positive for a small amount of Escherichia coli. The two samples from the snow showed negative results for both coliform and Escherichia coli and the two more public ponds that aren’t as commonly used as a source of human drinking water but animal drinking water tested in the higher range for coliforms but in the little to no Escherichia coli range. It was concluded that the remote pond should be avoided as it’s not a safe source of drinking water for humans or animals. Other than that, the the other ponds are likely to be safe from Escherichia coli, but coliforms are a risk factor.

INTRODUCTION: There are over 50 lakes and ponds in Cumberland County, Maine, all of various sizes and shapes. Many of these lakes serve different purposes, from hydrating plants to being a source of water for both animals and humans. With this responsibility, comes the question, are these ponds and lakes safe drinking water for animals and humans? Contaminated water poses a risk for both humans and animals.

A coliform bacterial is a bacterium that has the following charact...

... middle of paper ...

... Gorham, Maine, and two runoff snowbanks both located on the USM campus in Gorham. The main goal of this experiment was to see which lakes and ponds tested positive for coliform of Escherichia coli and to come up with some reasoning as to why. It was expected that many of the lakes would test positive for Escherichia coli given that there are plants as well as animals and fish that come in contact with the water. Both snowbanks were negative for coliforms as well as Escherichia coli indicating that there won’t be any contamination from these places running into ponds. Hinckley Reserve and Sebago Lake tested positive for coliforms we well as Escherichia coli. The pond near the turf field at USM tested high for both coliforms as well as Escherichia coli. This was certainly the most dangerous water sample taken, meaning it should not be consumed nor swam in.

Open Document