Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
architecture effects on society
architecture effects on society
Questions of Environmental Psychology and psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: architecture effects on society
In architecture, spaces are more or less defined by boundaries. A psychological phenomena directed to and brought out by the architectural environment can be described as experiential qualities. These affective qualities have the potential to bring out emotional response to architectural environments, which can be either conscious judgment or a sub-conscious mood changing effect.
Psychology and architecture is a broad and diverse subject of study. On exploring the field of environmental psychology, we understand the physical and behavioural effects between people and their physical environments become quite complex when acoustical characteristics (noise), elements of light and colour (warm or cool, shade or tint), texture (materials and surface) are taken into account. Environmental psychology may be broken into several elements:
1.) Awareness or Understanding how people notice their environment
2.) Perception or how people cognitively map what they experience based on what they know or what they think of the environment.
Perceiving buildings is a complex process since it not only involves sensations such as seeing but also perception. Experience with other past buildings is also important. We store and recall our sensory experiences when it comes to architecture and buildings through evaluation, decision making, emotions and affect, as well as interaction and movement.
In Paimio Sanatorium, designed by Alvar Aalto, he laid out the patient’s wing in such a way that it was maximally exposed to sunlight and good views. Light exposure has been shown to decrease an average stay at a mental asylum from 13 to 4 days compared to patients in a dimly lit room. This shows how important experience of a space is. Given these factors...
... middle of paper ...
...son experiences the need of socialising and also personal spaces where the person has no disturbance and can concentrate. Our built environment can be structured to encourage or discourage social interactions. For example, Hallways generally tend to discourage social interaction while circular rooms tend to encourage social interaction. Our built environment can also affect social ordering by interacting with our perceptions of personal space an territory.
Architecture a symbolic and intentional endeavour seems to reflect the psychology of its designers regardless of time, culture and perhaps even species. Space, form, and light are elements that are often incorporated either purposefully of unconsciously for aesthetic or practical reasons but more pointedly give creatures meaning, purpose and stability amidst an ever changing physical universe of seeming chaos.
...just the physical features. This is the same way Gothic Architecture was design to overwhelm and make feel the individual inferior to the institution behind the building. Consequently, the conceptual aspect of the building came as a secondary element in the design of the building. Such as the experience and feeling of the people coming to this building and being inside. The same way Gothic Architecture did it.
But these contrived differences give rise to esthetic difficulties too. Because inherent differences—those that come from genuinely differing uses—are lacking among the buildings and their settings, the contrivances repre...
...hey have entered the house, and then keeps it as you pass through the disappearing walls, pivoting doors, retractable stairs, and floating floors. It incorporates architecture, interior architecture and furniture design to create a total design that can be modified for different occupants. It truly is functional space.
Frank Lloyd Wright is one of America’s most influential architects that has left a legacy of structures that are collaged with Nature (Mead, 2014, February). Frederick Law Olmsted, the father of landscape architecture, has left a legacy of tranquil spaces hidden within parks that are known for their “picturesque” qualities (Mead, 2014, January). These two men are completely different with the designs that they’ve created simply because they are using different mediums, but ultimately there aren’t a lot of contrasting elements to their designs. The similarities are evident when you begin to look at their main priority when designing; mental health and wellness. With health and wellness as a mutual focus it is easy to find that they had complementary design influences, theories, and design principles. To create a design that successfully helps to soothe the mind they both found that Nature is the best tool to use. This tool is now their unique contribution to design history, and as a result it stands out as something that today’s designers want to mimmic when focusing on mental health and wellness.
“Frank Lloyd Wright’s architecture was rooted in Nature; he called it Organic. At the heart of his work was simplicity, harmony, unity, and integrity” (Lind, C., 1992).
... pre-existing knowledge that when an individual recognise specific situations they use their own views, beliefs, understanding and stereotypes to form a full view or understanding.
Remarkably, unlike in the description of art or music, the notion of atmosphere remains largely unaddressed in architecture. Atmosphere, can be argued, is the very initial and immediate experience of space and can be understood as a notion that addresses architectural quality, but the discussion of atmosphere in architecture will always entail, by definition, a certain ambiguity. After all, atmosphere is something personal, vague, ephemeral and difficult to capture in text or design, impossible to define or analyse. Atmosphere, Mark Wigley says, “evades analysis, it’s not easily defined, constructed or controlled”.
From the early Greek temples of yesteryear, to the high-tech autonomous buildings of tomorrow, the question of whether the function of a building or its aesthetics qualities are more important has plagued the minds of architects around the world. Webster's II New College Dictionary (Please do not use the encyclopedia or the dictionary to open your essay--way too high school.) defines aesthetics as "The branch of philosophy that provides a theory of the beautiful and of the fine arts" (18). The definition of Functionalism is defined by Webster's as "The doctrine that the function of an object should determine its design and materials" (453). Now, if the function of an object decides the type of design and materials used how does one integrate aesthetics into design, and moreover, how important are aesthetics to an architect? Frank Lloyd Wright was one of the greatest and most renowned architects of the 19th and 20th centuries, and while his buildings where lauded for displaying great artistic design, the issue of function was compromised by the blatant fact that his roofs leaked. This is because he let the aesthetics of his buildings become the focus of the structure, and neglected to adequately address the function of the building allowing for this problem to take root in his designs (Palermo, 4 Mar. 1999). As is apparent from Frank Lloyd Wright, there is a certain balance that has to be attained between aesthetics and functionalism in order for a structure to be appreciated as a successful building.
True architects are needed to create architectural beauty and they do so by using “elements which are capable of affecting our senses, and of rewarding the desire of our eyes...the sight of them affects us immediately” (16). Le Corbusier’s says that we must standardize architecture with respect to function so that we can mass produce it until we perfect its aesthetic through competition and innovation. Le Corbusier believed that Architecture schools weren’t teaching students correctly and that engineers would be the ones who save architecture. Architecture is a thing of plastic emotion. “It should use elements capable of striking our senses, of satisfying our visual desires…arranging them in a way that the sight of them clearly affects
Buildings reflect the values and ideas of society within periods. The role of architecture in shaping society and vice versa largely depends on the period in question and who or what affects first. The Enlightenment, and the subsequent period the Post-Enlightenment, reflect the biggest change for current ideas regarding architecture and society and current theories. At the same time, individual identities and understanding of society, progress and truth all follow a similar evolving path. It is during this dramatic shift in thinking that the role of architecture to society and the idea of progress and truth becomes a more complex relationship. How this relationship works and its implications is based on the theory that there is a direct link between the two. One cannot develop without the other. Who leads whom and to what extent they influence each other is evident in architectural trends and pioneering works by architects such as Robert Venturi, Frank Gehry amongst others.
Architecture is the concept of bringing structure, materiality, form and space together as a whole, provide people with enclosed atmosphere to experience. Considering this, it is important to identify that materiality and the purpose of details has been a key methodology to bringing architectural intentions into the design in an affective manner, more over producing an architectural expression. However, this position is rather declining in architecture, reducing tectonics and materiality to being secondary to form and space. With the start of modernism, the attempt to achieve minimalistic style has caused detailing to increasingly develop into a decorative aspect of a building, neglecting its individual contribution to architecture.
I believe that a better understanding of our basic human sensibilities is key to designing buildings of lasting resonance. The following discussion looks to the beginnings of architecture for its groundwork, namely through the reconsideration of the the ‘Cave’ typology. It seeks to tease out its latent spatial qualities as well as our innate cognitive responses and expectations of this environment, through it remedying the current design approach that is increasingly prospect
As elements of interior design develop, “Interior Designipedia is solution orientated for each of your design projects and in constantly changing” (Yule 1). “Of all the component elements that together form a completed interior, the single most important element is space” (Britannica School High 3). Many parts of design make a big impact on how they make the room feel. “Interior design styles are essentially about building an environment to seduce the emotions” (Yule 1). For example the “Textures can evoke feeling of elegance such as silk or informality such as rough, tweedy materials” (Britannica School High 6). Sculptures are very traditional pieces that add a great element to rooms (6). Another design element is lighting, which is one of the most important parts of design (Yule 3). As stated before, “light, both natural and artificial, is one of the most important design elements” (Britannica School High 4). Many of the interior designs used in the United S...
Over the last four years of studying architecture, I have seen the power that it has to shape communities, shape lives, and to create new ways that people interact with each other. The way architecture can help enhance living and allow for creation of new interactions of people is one of the reasons I find the subject so interesting. The way architecture can shape a whole culture and the way that the culture then in turn shapes the architecture is fascinating to me. Architecture is also not a static subject, it is constantly evolving and adapting with time to take on new forms, create new spaces, and to provide commentary on the history of our time on Earth. The depth that architecture has, and the evolution of the subject is something I have fallen in love with through my study of it. However, when I first started out studying architecture, I had no idea of the depth that the subject had, and it was an incredibly daunting realization; however, it was as equally exciting. I have always had a love for learning and architecture has just fueled that fire. Even after completing my bachelors degree, the learning has not stopped. I get to learn something new about architecture daily, and getting to say that is an opportunity I am thankful to have. It is not just about the learning however, its
Nature in architecture is critical. Laugier made this clear in the 1700s with his basic, but insightful, claims in “An Essay on Architecture.” Modern architects have taken his beliefs further than he probably ever imagined with technology and the cutting-edge idea of biomimicry. After studying natures’ artistic design, architectural stature, and overall success rate on this earth, I believe that the incorporation of nature is vital to architectural design.