Internationally there are many college campuses that are closed so that the productivity as well as the safety of the school are increased. A closed campus, in Asian countries such as China and South Korea, are set up where walls are built around the college campus so that only students or faculty may enter the premises. The students of closed campuses probably have less stress and higher grades, thus higher productivity. Albeit students have more freedom to do whatever they wish to do on an open campus, students are developing a need to enroll in a college with a closed campus due to, all needs or wants being available on campus, less traffic, and the overall safety for students and faculty.
Having an open campus would help students, who more than likely just graduated high school, transition into adults. The students, especially first year students, are experiencing a new lifestyle. Students are given options to do whatever they wish, including partying, drinking, and leaving campus for their own personal adventures. Having an open campus allows students to leave whenever they want to. For example, if a group of students want to go to a dine-in restaurant for a meal, they can all converge into a group of cars and simply drive off campus, giving up their rare, close, parking spot. Students who leave campus can return if they wish too, so that they may visit the library, or grab a coffee from the book store with friends. Students who attend open door colleges, who live off campus, hold the right to go to their house for lunch or for a break and return to campus for their next class. The students of open campuses are given massive amounts of responsibility, as a result of being allowed to travel wherever they wish, including bei...
... middle of paper ...
...ironmental emergency such as tornadoes keeping the students safe within campus. Ultimately, closed campuses are more secure and control the environment in which the students and faculty are protected by outsiders who could potentially hurt them, or disrupt the education process in any manner.
Basically, a campus featuring a closed door policy is truly better than a campus with an open door policy. Controlling who enters the premises offers security and safety to all on campus grounds compared to letting anyone who wishes to access the university, enter. Students and faculty of a closed door university have all necessary materials available to them on campus, less vehicle or pedestrian traffic, and more safety to all those on campus. Thusly, having a closed campus limiting stranger danger is generally better for people compared to an open campus letting anyone in.
Supporting Point Why should college campuses be any different? They contain the country’s future presidents, senators and judges. They are also one of the most vulnerable places because most colleges don’t allow firearms on campus. The most important factor is that many students don’t pay attention to their surroundings so they are put in dangerous situations and they should be able to defend themselves to a certain extent.
Keep their reputation of a safe place and community: It is known that if the parents are happy with the universities the students are, a part of the decision relies on the parents approval. If there are a large amount of sexual assaults and crime rates the parent is more than likely to try to rule out that specific University or college therefor keeping low numbers become
American society has started to take education for granted. Today it is so easy for most anyone to afford or to be accepted into a college that you wind up with people being here to socialize instead of learn and that leads to a decline in overall performance because it turns the atmosphere away from learning and into more of a four year party before the real world. Society seems to show college as a next step, almost if its a responsibility instead of a choice which hurts not only themselves but at the same time serving as a distraction for the people who are aspiring to do something better with their life. These dedicated individuals deserve better than to be forced into an environment where they are subjugated to a mass of people who would rather party than learn. The real students have enough to deal with as it is but forcing people to go to class would only exacerbate the situation forcing focus driven students to have important cla...
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, some 20.5 million students are expected to attend American colleges and universities, constituting an increase of about 5.2 million since fall 2000. In addition to this increase of incoming college students, the constant question of “why” does as well. You have one side that says yes! They believe that college is the answer to America’s problems, while the other hand, says that college is not necessarily the answer. Although both of these sides seem to be on the opposite spectrum of everything; they both agree on a few common themes. One being that they both desire for America to be greater and that the quality of everyone 's lives to be the best they can possibly be.
As time goes on, each class of students gains and loses freedoms. An open campus freedom would not only just let students go where they please; it would also give the students a responsibility to manage their time. Many administrators on the board of education do not think that a high school student should have such a responsibility. They would tell us that we are too immature to be able to manage time during the school day. I think that students are mature enough to have such a freedom placed within their grasps. I can anticipate that the opposition will be outraged by all students receiving this freedom and responsibility. If such a concept as open campus could be arranged, there surely would be rules and regulations placed in effect to ensure that the school will not have liability of the student once off school ground.
...students are so busy with homework, their jobs, and their classes, it is a lot more convenient to go to the stores on campus.
Dazey, Josh. “Campus puts students at undue risk: while restricting “basic natural rights”. Ifeminists. Feb 12, 2002. http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2002/0212b.html
...ucation. Isn’t that what a college is, an educational destination. While all these arguments create different views on the topic, they keep on repeating the same things over and over again.
Diversity is a common issue everywhere, people find it hard to accept others who are different than than them in any way, and racial diversity is an especially big issue. College campuses create opportunities for students to become more accepting about diversity. They are surrounded by students of many different cultures and races opening their minds to new ideas.
The Second Amendment guarantees that an individual’s right to possess and bear arms will not be infringed upon, yet college campuses have denied their students’ right to carry a weapon for years. As of 2014, 22 states do not allow students to carry guns on campus and 22 leave the policy of guns on campus to the schools. The remaining 6 allow students to carry weapons, but not necessarily into school buildings. Only in Utah is a student’s right to concealed carry protected by state law. While the government, state or federal, may not be able to control a private institutions right to ban guns, on public school grounds, students should be allowed to legally carry weapons, as they are on almost any other public grounds. Not only is the right protected by the Second Amendment, allowing concealed carry on campuses would contribute to lower crime rates, rather than lead to more crime.
Community college and universities both serve great purposes. Community college serves a better purpose for those who are not mentally or educationally prepared to move on to a much higher-level education and those who have jobs. It’s also for those who do not want the social aspect or who wants more personal once on once attention in class. Universities are set out for those who achieved their high school goals and are ready to leave home and become more independent. It is similarly better for the college experience of dorm life and sport activities. It all depends on the individual student making the choice, their financial status, maturity level, and their overall wants during their college life.
Recently the school board has decided to make HVHS a closed campus. I believe this is a good idea. Many reasons why i believe this is a good idea. For one the school cafeteria food is delicious and nutritious. Second reason why, so students can make friends and socialize. Lastly staying on campus will keep the students safe.
Tuition over the years have made it the struggle for students and their parent to make ends meet. The dorms cost a lot that make it payment really high. Living off campus would make life so much easier for parents and myself because the cost of the school would not cost as much as it does living in the dorms. The school should let students live off campus if they have 2 or more people living with them. If the school did let students live off campus I feel like they should be able to have room checks just like they do in the dorms. If the parents of the students let them live off campus the school should be able to let them do it too. Because really the parents of the students have more authority over the school. I feel that now that a lot of the dorms are getting broken into that it would be way safer to live off campus. That way I know that it is my responsibility if someone was to break into my house. If anything is broking into in our room even if it is locked I don’t think the school pays to get any of the stuff replaced. So living off campus can help students to have responsibility and become a real adult in the college
Every student would benefit from having a 24-hour library. Students could pull all night studying for upcoming exams, extra jobs for tutors and librarian staff, and students could maintain their own personal jobs. Having an open library can benefit multiple people.
Students living on campus don’t have to worry about time because they live in the college. On the other hand, students who commute to school, have to worry about getting to class on time. Students living on campus don’t have to waste money on transportation or food since it is all covered under a plan. Unlike commuters, who aren’t covered under a plan, they have to pay more money to get to school as well as for food. Students who live on campus tend to know more people and they know more about what’s going on around campus. However, students, who commute, don’t have that advantage because they are home most of the time. Living on campus can be more beneficial than living at home in many ways.