Emile Durkheim Research Paper

509 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why is crime functional for society

Crime might be endemic to all societies. It has been long argued that crime serves several functions in our society, which could be classified as either socially functional or dysfunctional. Emile Durkheim believed that a certain amount of crime is necessary and healthy for any society. He reasoned that crime is not only inevitable, but also functional for society. Durkheim identified both positive side as well as negative effects of crime. According to his book the Rules of Sociological Method (1895), Durkheim pointed out that crime and consecutive punishment provides positive effects on society as it establishes and reassures the social norms of a society; whereas too much crime leads to social disruption.

Positive aspects of crime …show more content…

In other words, it means that deviance acts bring back the boundaries to focus to the society as well as clarifying the social boundaries. When an individual is taken to the court due to committing a crime or breaking a law, the court dramatise the wrong doing of the person and stigmatise the offender publicly by means of reporting crimes in newspapers, radio or television. In addition, Durkheim also believes that social consensus could be clearly marked out by punishing the offenders. Punishment is a lesson for future criminals as well as it serves the purpose of strengthening public solidarity because by punishing the offenders, it creates fear among potential criminals and most importantly, it unites the society against deviant behaviours when the public witnesses the suffering of the norm-breakers (Thompson, 2009). This function could be more effective in societies that still practice the public punishment system. For example, in some American states such as Taxes, the use of lethal injection is still being practiced where the public can witness and watch the process of executions. As a result, crime reinforces the boundaries of the community making it functional, positive and

Show More
Related

  • Deviant Behavior: A Study on Steven Avery's Case

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crime and deviant behavior surprisingly helps increase “social activity” among various different people within a society. Therefore, crime and deviant behavior brings “people together in a common posture of anger and indignation…when these people come together to express their outrage over the offense…they develop a tighter sense of solidarity than existed earlier” (Erikson 4). For example, in the Steven Avery case, the people of Manitowoc, Wisconsin, all had very strong feelings of Steven Avery and his family, and as a result they were seen as deviant people in their own hometown. Those feelings towards him, and his family, would be a critical factor when he was accused of the horrendous crime (Making). Based on their feelings towards the Avery family, the society in which he lived developed the overall concept of us versus them (Erikson 11). Therefore, another concept that arises as a result of crime and deviant behavior is public temper, which is described as a “mutual group feeling” (Erikson

    Read More

  • Popular Punitivism In The Criminal Justice System

    1418 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main topic that we get from this idea is popular punitivism. Popular punitivism is a process that is used all over the world to try and control crime. It is a concept that balances coercion and consent that uses movements that are with the popular opinion “to engage in vote buying and power maintenance” (Makin). The idea of this is that officials focus crimes that the public is seeing more often than usually. Looking at Cohen’s deviancy amplification process can help explain this better. The process shows that when the media begins to talk more about a certain crime then the public thinks that that particular crime rate is rising and the clear up rate is falling. After this the fear of crime increasing and there begins to be a mass panic. The officials see this panic and focus their attention on the punishment of that crime. New legislations are created that impose more severe punishments so that the officials can show the community that they see what is going on and they are trying to fix it. Citizens believe that if the officials are tough on the crime than the problem will go away. However, we know that the problem does not just go away and now that we have harsher penalties there are more people being thrown into

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    The individuals within our society have allowed we the people to assess and measure the level of focus and implementation of our justice system to remedy the modern day crime which conflict with the very existence of our social order. Enlightening us to the devices that will further, establish the order of our society, resides in our ability to observe the Individual’s rights for public order.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment: A Perspective from Death Row

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    punishment is an asset to society: it is the only punishment that fits the crime, it deters potential criminals

    Read More

  • The Three Main Theories of Deviance and Their Strengths and Weaknesses

    2010 Words  | 5 Pages

    Without punishment the crime rate would reach a point where it became dysfunctional. Durkheim's views have been developed by A. Cohen (1966) who discussed two possible functions of deviance: 1. Deviance can be a 'safety valve', providing a relatively harmless expression of discontent. For example, prostitution enables men to escape from family life without undermining family stability. 2.

    Read More

  • Durkheim's Conception Of Strain Theories

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although he argued from a sociological standpoint, Durkheim suggested that rates of suicide are higher in anomic societies. Applying Durkehim’s concept of anomie to criminal behavior,

    Read More

  • The Normality Of Crime Durkheim Summary

    1190 Words  | 3 Pages

    Article 25, by Emile Durkheim “The Normality of crime” This article an expert from Emile Durkheim’s 1895 essay rules of the Sociological method it is focused on how it is in an inevitable for at least some members in society to misbehave against that society’s values or beliefs (Durkheim, 2014). He believed the only true way to completely eliminate murder from society would to make every member from society respect each other. In turn this would cause the lighter acts of crime or mischief seem much larger.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Justice System

    2367 Words  | 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system views any crime as a crime committed against the state and places much emphasis on retribution and paying back to the community, through time, fines or community work. Historically punishment has been a very public affair, which was once a key aspect of the punishment process, through the use of the stocks, dunking chair, pillory, and hangman’s noose, although in today’s society punishment has become a lot more private (Newburn, 2007). However, it has been argued that although the debt against the state has been paid, the victim of the crime has been left with no legal input to seek adequate retribution from the offender, leaving the victim perhaps feeling unsatisfied with the criminal justice process. Furthermore, can formal social control institutions such as the criminal justice system and the government provide the best aspect of producing conformity and law abiding behaviour? Hirschi’s (1969) social control theory is concerned with what effect formal institutions have on conformity in individuals and in particular, how law abiding behaviour is produced due to these institutions (Walklate, 2005).

    Read More

  • What is wrong about Donald Black's theory of law?

    1247 Words  | 3 Pages

    Law, ?a governmental social control? (Black 2), is a quantitative variable that changes in time and space and can be defined by style: penal, compensatory, therapeutic or conciliatory (Black 5). The brief description of law and its interrelation with social control and deviant behavior can be encapsulated in the following scheme. This concept of law put into the context of social life gives a framework of the behavior of law.

    Read More

  • Punishment

    1113 Words  | 3 Pages

    Crimes are not ‘given’ or ‘natural’ categories to which societies simply respond. The composition of such categories change from various places and times, and is the output of social norms and conventions. Also, crime is not the prohibitions made for the purpose of rational social defence. Instead, Durkheim argues that crimes are those acts which seriously violate a society’s conscience collective. They are essentially violations of the fundamental moral code which society holds sacred, and they provoke punishment for this reason. It is because of these criminal acts which violate the sacred norms of the conscience collective, that they produce a punitive reaction. (Ibid)

    Read More

  • Marxism And Functionalism On Crime Analysis

    1402 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, Durkheim’s Theory of Suicide identifies that too much crime wall lead to the collapse of society. In relation to the Hatton Garden robbery functionalists would argue that the crime was required for the positive functions of social regulation, social change and social integration. Explained as the necessity for levels of crime being required to reaffirm social boundaries and serve as a warning to others either with public outrage or a suitable punishment. Strengthening social cohesion through crime is essential to maintain communities. Further to this, social change for example the civil rights movement can be effected through acts of deviance and

    Read More

  • Does The Punishment Fit The Crime?

    864 Words  | 2 Pages

    Punishing the unlawful, undesirable and deviant members of society is an aspect of criminal justice that has experienced a variety of transformations throughout history. Although the concept of retribution has remained a constant (the idea that the law breaker must somehow pay his/her debt to society), the methods used to enforce and achieve that retribution has changed a great deal. The growth and development of society, along with an underlying, perpetual fear of crime, are heavily linked to the use of vastly different forms of punishment that have ranged from public executions, forced labor, penal welfare and popular punitivism over the course of only a few hundred years. Crime constructs us as a society whilst society, simultaneously determines what is criminal. Since society is always changing, how we see crime and criminal behavior is changing, thus the way in which we punish those criminal behaviors changes.

    Read More

  • Why Is Crime Important To Society

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    In every century, there have been different levels tolerance for crime. History has made an example of how crime destroys and benefit societies. Humans are not born with to act a certain way. Once a bady reach adolescence, this stage would cause some of the problems because of their development. Deviant behaviors can put into perspective the amount of morality and values people have. Crime is defined as an unlawful action. But, it can be seen as balance in society. Those who need to learn whats right the hard way can proceed a criminal path. Crime is beneficial to society because of social changes, prevents further disobedience, and set boundries.

    Read More

  • Emile Durkheim Research Paper

    1276 Words  | 3 Pages

    Emile Durkheim is one of the famous founders of modern sociology. Along with Karl Marx and Max Weber, he is commonly credited as one of the fathers of sociology, perhaps the most important founder of all. He devoted his life to studying sociology and wrote several famous dissertations, establishing still popular sociological theories. His most famous work was arguably Suicide, which studies the difference in suicide rates between Catholics and Protestants. While his research methods and conclusions in Suicide are thoughtful but faulty at best, Durkheim is undeniably a great contributer to the world of sociology.

    Read More

  • Biological Factors And Criminal Behavior

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    In contrast, Emile Durkheim argued that crime is a functional part of society; each society has its own rates and types of crimes. Durkheim stated, “What is normal, simply, is the existence of criminality, provided that it attains and does not exceed, for each social type, a certain level, which it is perhaps not impossible to fix in conformity with the preceding rules.” (Durkheim, p. 61) Durkheim did not see crime as something habitual or as a symptom of a diseased society. I agree with Durkheim’s opinion of crime and society, I think that crime will not entirely disappear; instead the form itself will change. (Durkheim)

    Read More

More about Emile Durkheim Research Paper

Open Document