preview

Emergence of Anarchy

opinion Essay
2346 words
2346 words
bookmark

New York Times, on Sunday, November 8, had an article on sentences addressed by a Federal judge to three members of the antigovernment Montana Freemen for conspiracy and fraud; the article stirred my memory and concern about this paper, as well as brought into play many of the dilemmas discussed in the Nature of Politics class. However, I do not wish to analyze this particular article or cult, but the emergence of anarchy. There have been theories and diagnosis of human nature: the Aristotelian, teleo- logical view of the political animal, the Platonic, metaphorical view of the chained caveman, the Hobbian, phobic view of savage life as inevitably ‘short’, and many notable others. Regardless of the differences found in these, there is a common denominator found in all. That is, human beings move from the animalistic, passive stage to the civilized stage in order to materialize their potential in full. In this domain, governments serve as expedients or facilitators of an anthropological movement. The mechanism may differ from one type of government to another, but its principal, common function is to lay and protect the foundations for a prosperous humanity. In aiming this, a totalitarian regime, an oligarchy, or even a democracy, resorts to some pattern of hierarchy. It is worth noticing, that no matter what degree of legitimacy one government enjoys, or another lacks, they both eventually assume an hierarchical order which in turn inevitably assures a pragmatic i n e q u a l i t y. History repeatedly proves that beyond theory. Even in Communist Soviet Union where all classes were abolished, as they were accused of being the source of all social misery, even then and there, hierarchy rose with the communist-party-class at its top. In the interstate system as well, although member-states are said to be equally sovereign, they gradually form a multipolar or bipolar structure where-in the eventual hegemons lobby. The complication, therefore, stems from the fact that any hierarchy fosters legal, pragmatic, social inequality among otherwise -legally- equal entities. Well, it is obviously not the case that people are gifted evenly at birth, or that they share perfect analogy and symmetry between them, despite Hobbes’ high figure of even selfishness. Society, kindly wishes to align people at a starting point in order to grant them the most humble yet violated right which, as first stated by St. Anselm, is that “all men are equal.

In this essay, the author

  • Opines that it is worth noticing, that no matter what degree of hierarchy, there is no hierarchy.
  • Explains how hierarchical order assures pragmatic i n e q u a l
  • Explains that classes were abolished, as they were accused of being the source of all social misery.
  • Opines that people are not gifted equally at birth, or that they are gifted evenly.
  • Opines that if there is wrong it becomes an abstract source of control and not a
  • Explains that freedom is the absence of any external force. any type of state is freedom.
  • Explains that they try to control or channel human nature based on a negative view of humans.
  • Opines that one may reject anarchy in theory or practice, but still needs to address its causes.
  • Opines that there is no fear of sudden, radical change in ephemeral trends.
  • Explains that one develops a social conscience by raising questions.
  • Explains that this was a steady practice in the ancient city-states in order to encourage attendance.
  • Opines that government is abstract, alien, or faceless when one is an active part of it.
  • Opines that human beings need to belong to a whole, if this need is addressed by an ideology.
  • Opines that security, and all the grand goods a state provides, do not amount to the appeal of the state.
  • Describes the lower middle classes, as well as incentives for the wealthy to care for and donate to their families.
  • Opines that this custom needs to be fostered and promoted, since all humans share the need.
  • Compares the state that serves the citizen, versus, the citizens who serve.
  • Opines that it is fairly right to say that all good things are good or all bad.
  • Opines that the article stirred my memory and concern about this paper, and brought into play many of the dilemmas discussed in the nature of politics class.
  • Opines that society, kindly wishes to align people at a starting point in order to grant them the most humble yet violated right which, as first stated by st. anselm, is that “all”.
  • Explains that a government is an arbitrary or legitimate hegemon of society, as the entity at the top of the hierarchical chain.
  • Explains that such power is a pure form of c o n t r
  • Argues that if justice is not found within the state, one may choose to live in a state of nature, where justice may not be found.
  • Explains that this value appeals to humans as being the highest and most true as far back as 400-300 bc.
  • Argues that attractiveness is based on a positive view of human nature. human beings are for the most part capable of rationally governing themselves.
  • Opines that authentic pedagogy should be seen as a means of culture and not as luxury in any respectable human society.
  • Opines that universities should be centers of culture, and that education is an end in itself. only when one understands one is able to forgive.
  • Opines that bureaucracy should be diminished in favor of mutual trust and reliance. capital and time saved could be invested.
  • Opines that a given sum transferred from rich to poor would enhance the welfare of the latter more than it would decrease
Get Access