Another aspect of this moral right is the aid of others. Aiding and assisting an individual with ensuring their liberty. One is justified in restraining anyone who tries to prevent them from exercising their rights. We have moral rights and the right to protect others and ourselves from those who oppose our rights. A right is an entitlement each individual has to something.
Throughout the discussion of Fuller’s conception of human dignity, I attempted to demonstrate some features of this connection. To recall the conclusion of this conception, in brief, it has been argued that the idea of human dignity is the practical morality value that allows the human being to exercise her or his freedom as agent effectively in the context of social interactions. To have a dignity means to have a condition that recognizes a person as free and responsible agents –practical persons. On the one hand, the value of dignity allows human agents to exercise their freedom in pursuing their ends. On the other hand, the value of dignity demands of human agents to hold the responsibility for their actions when they enter into any social relationship with other fellow human
The integrity of the body and the sanctity of the mind can exist on the foundation that each individual possesses an inalienable ability and right to preserve a private space in which the human personality can develop. Without the ability to make choices, the inviolability of the personality would be in doubt. Recognizing a zone of privacy is but an acknowledgment that each individual must be entitled to chart and pursue the course of development of personality. Hence privacy is a postulate of human dignity itself. In that zone of privacy, an individual is not judged by others.
Human rights are explained as some form of right due to a person in a social context because he is human . Looking at the concept of human rights from a historical perspective, it would be seen that it is neither entirely western nor so modern; rather it is the crystallization of values that are common heritage of mankind . The expression "Human Rights" denotes all those rights, which are inherent in our nature without which we cannot live as human beings. Human Rights being eternal part of the nature of human beings are essential for individuals to develop their personality, their human qualities, intelligence, talent and conscience and to satisfy their spiritual and other higher needs. Further it is described that the rights, which are natural and inherent for the life and happiness of every individual are called human rights.
Their fundamental assumption is that each person is a moral and rational being who deserves to be treated with dignity. They are called human rights because they are universal. Whereas nations or specialized groups enjoy specific rights that apply only to them, human rights are the rights to which everyone is entitled. Human rights entail both rights and obligations. States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights.
Tasioulas believes that two things that will help explain the criteria for rights lies in possibility and burden. This saying that it is understood that there are cases that interest cannot fulfill duty for many reasons, but it needs to be met at times to let human interests further contribute to human rights. If it is possible to meet the duties needed next you must consider the burden it places on the bearer and on the society as a whole. Tasioulas concludes, “if it can be successfully executed, the interest-based account of human rights promises to make sense of the phenomenon that eluded Wolterstorff: the status of the right-holder as the ultimate source of the moral claim embodied in his rights.” All this to say that there are foundations to human
First, it is imperative to define human dignity. The lexical definition of human dignity is “the state of being worthy of honor or respect.” Meaning to say that a person is worthy of honor or respect means that that person has human dignity. There are two types of dignity, intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic dignity means that the fact that one is human makes that person worthy of respect. To recognize respect for a person is to acknowledge that that person has dignity.
Human beings have had moral obligation to respect all humans who are humans. The Humanity formulation forbids the objectification of humanity. To act morally you must respect the worth as persons who are above price. To treat me as a person with a dignity is to recognize me as a person capable of making rational choices. If you were to lie, harm, or treat someone like my only value is being something you need then, then you are treating the simply as an instrument.
This ethical thread that runs through both these theories bears hints of the golden rule that one should treat others, as he himself would want to be treated. One is left with the idea that no matter what the reason for valuing freedom and autonomy, that there is freedom in living in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.
Then finally the last moral dimension is the Quality of Life. Quality of Life is the values that are often preserved in information. This moral asks questions about the institutions being protected from violations, and what cultural values are being supported. Some of the ethical issues that arise is data storage and costs, advanc... ... middle of paper ... ...on. Respect for Autonomy is when people are allowed to reign over themselves and be able to make choices that apply to their lives.