Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Plastic and its effect on environment
Plastic and its effect on environment
Essay about problem of electronic waste
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Plastic and its effect on environment
With the astounding progress we have made over the last 50 years in technological advances it is no surprise that it is referred to as the information age with all of the things we have been able to achieve. From landing on the moon, from a computer and a cell phone as one all of our landmarks that have been seen as greatness, they are also seen by many as garbage, and a lot of it. In the near future we will be making better, faster, and cooler stuff always advancing but that will leave a lot of today's garbage to be attended to, as well futures garbage. This is known as Electronic Waste or frequently referred to as eWaste. The type of waste that is of technology of any kind, computers, microwaves, toasters and much, much more.
What Is Electronic Waste(eWaste)?:
eWaste is the term used to associate garbage that is only specific for electronics, that ranges from anything with batteries to something that must be plugged in order to work (of course there maybe exceptions where some stuff that require plugging in are not considered electronics). eWaste enters its own line of waste disposal for many different reasons such as, the difficulty of decomposition, and the health and safety concerns it brings when it must be disposed. With our century being run by electronics and the day-to-day survival is only accountable now with our phones, the internet, TV' s, coffee makers and much more it is hard to say how much garbage we have made out of all of this stuff. Although it is not hard to presume that the amount of eWaste is growing. With many more attractive pieces of electronics from last years, the coolest trends, and the planning of the management team of the electronics companies to make the life span of these electronics not s...
... middle of paper ...
... of resolving where eWaste should, more people, and the earth will have to pay the consequences. Geographers have a clear understanding o on the environmental affects eWaste has and all its toxins that are released in the world. And the more geographers know about eWaste the more are involved in finding a resolution.
Works Cited
• Team, Step. "What Is E-waste? - STEP." What Is E-waste? - STEP. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Dec. 2013.
• Retra, House. "Life Expectancy of Electronic Equipment." Retra Ltd Public. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Dec. 2013.
• Toothman, Jessika. "How E-waste Works." HowStuffWorks. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Dec. 2013.
• Chatteron, Paul. "Endangered Tree Kangaroos." WorldWildlife.org. World Wildlife Fund, n.d. Web. 26 Dec. 2013.
• EWaste. "The Future of Electronic Waste Recycling." E Waste and Computer Recycling RSS. N.p., 4 Oct. 2012. Web. 26 Dec. 2013.
...e recycle system to be constantly upgraded with the latest technology when it comes on the market.
... everyone on Earth as it would no doubt affect everyone on Earth. Geoengineering and the outcomes of its use are such a vast unknown that it could potentially end up destroying the Earth or saving it. There is no other decision that could have such a huge impact that turning to geoengineering could potentially hold. Trying to save the Earth through artificial geoengineering ways was the point of Bullis’ article. Bullis not only is credible because of his position as an editor for the journal Technology Review but also furthers his ethos through quoting scientist and providing his own reasoning. Bullis does not use pathos in his article, given that it is more based in reason than emotion. Bullis wrote a very logical article on geoengineering and the implications it has on the world. Geoengineering could end up destroying the world or saving it from destruction.
Even though electronic waste contributes one percent of waste as discussed earlier, it poses a significant threat to the environment. “RCRA does not, however, cover electronic waste except CRTs, nor does it regulate electronic devices donated for educational or charitable reuse.” The RCRA should implement rules to govern e-waste because e-waste not only affects lives in the United States, It affects everyone globally. E-waste typically finds its ways out of the United States and ends up in developing countries like
The e-waste trade is an exploitative industry in which electronics, circuit boards, old TV’s and desktops that are of no more value, get dumped into third world countries such as Ghana, Vietnam, Malaysia, Pakistan, Hong Kong, and many others. The people of these third world countries than burn the electronics in order to collect the remains and scraps of copper and iron that can be sold for money. The smell and burning smolder of plastic from the computers and old TV’s are incredibly toxic, slowly killing the children, women, and men that burn these e-waste remains in order to create a living for themselves. Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and Emile Durkheim all have theories that can be applied and related to this trade of e-waste. Adam Smith’s theory
It is generally perceived that electronics are not intended for reuse. In the event that it is completed accurately, hardware reusing can anticipate contamination, make occupations, and spare assets as specified by Thomas, Valerie.... ... middle of paper ... ... The Web.
Electronic waste, or any waste for that matter is an inevitable part of an economic system where the destruction of an ecosystem is the primarily source of resources that are used to create the product. The waste that occurs from this process has to be disposed of in some way and more often than not, it is disposed of carelessly with out consideration to the affect it would have on the environment or the very people that create and let capitalism live on, “The political economy approach also defers progress on environmental issues to a pint after economic ones are solved” (Robbins et al. 2010, 114). And if this continues there may be no place left for the excess waste created by capitalism.
In addition, individuals dispose off their electronic waste wrongly, and it ends up in the incinerators, where toxic gases are produced.
For example: technology and electronics are a huge part of our culture and society. The “fast paced” nature of technology creates products that become outdate very quickly. Electronics not containing lead or mercury are very much recyclable. However, instead of recycling, people just throw these items away, not thinking ...
A. Attention Getter: “The U.S. buried or burned more than 166 million tons of resources—paper, plastic, metals, glass and organic materials—in landfills and incinerators in 2008. We recycled and composted only one-third of our discards. U.S. EPA, 2009. Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States, Detailed Tables and Figures for 2008.” (Environmental Facts 2011)
America and Europe are at the top of the list for most waste generated according to Waste (4). This is very visible because there’s litter on every street in the towns and cities, as well in lakes, beaches, and rivers. The book Waste by Rob Bowden states that the amount of waste produced is increasing at a rate faster than population growth. About 1.5 million computers, in the U.K, are thrown away each year and most end up in landfills. There are 3 types of waste which are Municipal Solid Waste, Industrial Waste, and Hazardous waste. MSW includes waste from public garbage cans and local dumpsters. Industrial Waste includes massive amounts of waste water that is contaminated with chemicals. Hazardous waste is the most dangerous as it presents a danger to human health and the environment. Solutions for waste disposal take time because people need to consider their lifestyle and limit the amount of waste they generate. A good start is to recycle items such as paper, cans, plastic, and clothes. This way they don’t end up in landfills, beaches, or streets. Another solution is to join organizations that go around places to recycle, or organizations that demand the reduction in the amount of products that are being
As humanity develops new technology, the magnitude and severity of waste increases. When computers were developed, it widely was believed that the need for paper would be eliminated. On the contrary this was widely proven false and we are now utilizing more paper than ever. Canada is not an exception as the typical Canadian generates an average of three pounds of solid waste each day1. This alone shows what a careless species we have become- using and disposing materials without even considering the damage we are causing. With half a trillion tones of waste around the world, only 25% may be reused for a second or third time and less than 5% can be renewed limitlessly1. These facts are true only in developed countries. Since these traditional waste reduction methods have been proven inefficient, we must endorse new innovative technology to arrive at a solution.
Many people assume that the environment is not in danger. They believe that as technology advances, we do not need to worry about renewing natural resources, recycling, and finding new ways to produce energy. They state that one person in the world does not make a large difference. In reality, each individual's contribution greatly affects our environment. Our natural resources are slowly disappearing, and we must work together to save them and the Earth from ruin.
The average resident produces seven and a half pounds of garbage every day that is buried down in landfills and litter lands, costing a great amount of money. Nowadays, people face no more critical problem than the need to save the weakening environment, mainly in urban areas, where solid wastes are uselessly dumped. It has been observed that cities have no controlled structure for garbage disposal. Each year, millions of dollars are spent picking up litter and more is thrown away in valuable materials that could be recycled. As humanity develops new technology and equipment, the level of waste increases every day.
Web. 21 Nov 2011. "Recycling | Reduce, Reuse, Recycle | US EPA. " US Environmental Protection Agency. Web.
Recycling is such a fantastic way for us to reuse the waste we once throw. Yet, not everything is easy to be done in this world. There many difficulties that face recycling process economically and socially. Usually In order to recycle, waste paper needs to be sorted and treated from any Impurities. Which means that companies will loss finance because there must be someone or something that could sort or treat these papers. Another problem is that to start recycling, companies needs a lot of good recyclable supply to pick it up; after all, they need good economic benefits (Problems with Recycling, 2014). According to the Waste and Resources Action Program, there are some barriers p...