Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for and against economic integration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Economic integration is defined as an economic disposition between different divisions that are associated together through the synchronisation of fiscal and monetary policies as well as the reduction or elimination of barriers to entry for trading. The sole aims of economic integration are to succour both consumers and producers, by minimising costs, and also to maximise trade between the countries which are involved.
In total, there are 8 stages in the economic integration operation, starting from a highly loose alliance of countries in a preferential trade area, to a completely economically integrated coalition, whereby all the economies of the member countries in the union are thoroughly integrated. The first stage is when all countries start out as independent economies, then they proceed on to the ‘preferential trade area’ stage, followed by a free
…show more content…
The free movement of their goods and services should be able to prompt and increase its trade, with the barriers of entry being stripped away. Theoretically, all Member States in the European Union are able to benefit from this because it grants them the opportunity to specialise in those goods and services that they are proportionately more coherent at producing.
Furthermore, domestic producers also face strong competition against international producers due to the reduction in the barriers to trade, and when there is an increase in the size of the market in which firms are able to sell, this delegates UK’s economy to harvest their economies of scale. All in all, these repercussions function to lower consumption prices in addition to raising overall economic welfare, despite the costs of the disruption or disintegration of a few sectors and industries upon exposure to international and foreign
The European Union has been helped economically ever since World War II. Right after World War II’s end, Europe was struggling to hold on. The countries of the modern-day European Union thought it would be a good idea to come together and help each others struggling economy. To this day, this decision has had a very positive outcome on the EU’s economy. As shown in Diagram 1, the European Union combined together has the world’s highest GDP at 18.3 Trillion USD as compared to the United States’ 17.4 Trillion USD GDP and China’s 10.4 Trillion USD GDP. The idea
In answering the above question, I shall address myself first to examining manufacturing exports and the British position, followed by a word on the Imperial Preference which hindered British trade flows with the rest of the world. I shall go on to talk more generally about whether there has been a decline in the aggregate economy (essentially exploring the pessimistic implied in the title). Further, I shall argue that the British economy has performed well against some serious cultural and structural constraints and should not be subjected to unduly negative analysis.
In conclusion, economic integration and economic globalization help reduce the probability of interstate belligerency because war negatively impacts the markets and investments, post World War reconstruction helps build stronger economies and lastly, countries would rather focus on specialization than war. In addition, economic integration and economic globalization help the economy grow and expand. These points show that war and conflict is decreasing because countries that are economically integrated prefer to free trade without any restrictions. As a result, markets increase since countries have more access to trade and that leads to an increase in globalization, whereas war would put the countries’ economies at risk.
”Examine the extent to which the benefits of UK membership in the European Union outweigh the costs” Economic integration is the joining of economic policies between different states/regions. This eliminates tariff and non-tariff barriers to the flow of goods, services and factors of production between the regions. Economic integration has varying levels referred to as trading blocs; these are a form economic integration. A trading bloc is a group of nations that have been made a bilateral or multilateral agreement. There are four types of trading blocs.
Few governments will argue that the exchange of goods and services across international borders is a bad thing. However, the degree to which an international trading system is open may come into contest with a state’s ability to protect its interests. Free trade is often portrayed in a good light, with focus placed on the material benefits. Theoretically, free trade enables a distribution of resources across state lines. A country’s workforce may become more productive as it specializes in products that it has a comparative advantage. Free trade minimizes the chance that a market will have a surplus of one product and not enough of another. Arguably, comparative specialization leads to efficiency and growth.
These “Inner Six” nations thus laid the framework for further integration of other nations within the region and its supranational principles were what led to the creation of the European Economic Community in 1957, further assimilating the European countries’ economies. The creations of these communities for economic purposes were meant to promote cooperation amongst European nations to prevent the further outbreak of violence which had subsided with the end of WWII. Through these general agreements of economic importance came further integration through the creation of more agreements throughout the 1960s, such as the abolishment of customs duties amongst their borders, creating free trade and border trade tax pacts among the Inner Six and across their borders to other signatory nations.
The political force moved away from the painstakingly and time-consuming technique of multilateral tariff negotiations to smaller regional and bilateral provisions - the Regional Trade Agreement. In these arrangements; members accord preferential treatment , basically agreeing to liberalize the exchange of goods and services amongst each another giving regard to certain trade barriers. RTA is not the first-hand way of trade liberalization though. Initially, when multilateral trade discussions used to happen, two-sided and multiparty FTA”s filled the vacuum. There were restrictions from stringent and premeditated trade arrangements earlier, thus a lot of states are now moving towards freer trade for their own benefits.
The modern age is full of many wonders that we, as humans, take advantage of everyday. This new world is the result of many processes and events including nationalism, revolutions, reformations, imperialism and nation-state building. However, in my opinion, industrialization and global integration had the most profound effect on the modern era. Industrialization and global integration gave way to many social, economical, and political changes affecting the modern world. People began migrating from farms to the cities, many new inventions and technologies came along, and imperialism occurred.
All nations can get the benefits of free trade by being specialized in producing goods they have a comparative advantage and then trade them with goods produced by other nations in the world. This is evidenced by comparative advantage theory. Trade depends on many factors, country's history, institution, size and. geographical position and many more. Also, the countries put trade barriers for the exchange of their goods and services with other nations in order to protect their own company from foreign competition, or to protect consumers from undesirable products, or sometimes it may be inadvertent.
Free trade is a form of economic policy which allows countries to import and export goods among each other with no government interference. In recent years there has been a general consensus in economist’s stance on free trade. They view free trade as an asset. Free trade allows for an abundance of goods with increased varieties and increased availability. The products become cheaper for consumers and no one company monopolizes an industry. The system of free trade has been highly controversial. While free trade benefits consumers it has the potential to hurt manufacturers and businesses thus creating a debate between supporters of free trade and those with antagonistic positions.
Firstly, what should be noted here is that international trade has been providing different benefits for firms as they may expand in different new markets and raise productivity by adopting different approaches. Given that nowadays marketplace is more dynamic and characterized by an interdependent economy, the volume of international trade has grown substantially in recent years, reducing the barriers to international trade. However, after experiencing the economic crisis that took its toll in 2008 many countries adopted a different approach in terms of trade barriers by introducing higher tariffs in order to protect domestic firms from foreign competition (Hill). Secondly, in order to better understand the implications of the political arguments for trade it is essential to highlight the main instruments of trade policy (See appendix 1).
CAFTA, the Central America Free Trade Agreement, or commonly known as the Dominican RepublicCentral America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA), is a free trade agreement. In international trade, free trade is an idealized market model, often stated as a political objective, in which trade of goods and services between countries are not hindered by government imposed tariffs (taxes on imports) or non-tariffs (Wikipedia, 2007).
This event has been drove by the concerns of currency traders who subscribed to the possibility that Brexit might implicate permanent damage on the Britain's economy. This assumption however has been counterfactual as Britain's economy is strong enough to prevent sudden collapse despite temporary jitters. Ever since then, the pound has been traded around 15 percent lower in comparison to the dollar and 12 percent lower when compared with euro. Although it results in domestic inflation that rises faster than workers’ wages, it proved to be be a beneficial economic boon for UK exporters due to the soaring cost of imports. This is a crucial key factor for the automotive industry in particular, where vehicles which may be completed in the UK are often comprised of imported component parts. As a matter of fact, automotive industry is considered the most vulnerable sector in the advent of Brexit because of its global exposure and heavy dependence on foreign workers. Though , both imports and exports in the UK has been boosted by weaker pound as currency strategists pointed that sterling shall remain volatile until greater clarity about the UK’s Brexit deal is
The case for regional integration is both simple and irrefutable. First we are small and we need to achieve economies of scale. We need to achieve such economies in markets, production, the mobilisation of regional capital for regional use, university education, science and technology, sea and air transport to mention some areas.
Much of the political case for regional economic integration stems from national security. Another case study provided by Hill is the European Union. The nation states of Western Europe bonded together in an effort to deal with the political giants of the USSR to the east and the USA to the west. Further, regional economic integration can facilitate political harmony between nations due to their increased level of