Introduction For many centuries, technology has encouraged growth: through increases in inequality and the market labor. Economists say that structural unemployment “occurs because workers don’t have the particular skills demanded by employers.” (Structural Unemployment: The Economists Just Don 't Get It. (2010, August 4)) There are many who question if technology has indeed raised or increases structural unemployment or if it hasn’t worsened the situation (by machinery taking over the jobs of humans for example or jobs that need a particular set of skills). But let’s say that technology changes do increase structural unemployment, why do most governments and economists encourage such change? This I will answer below.
Why do most
…show more content…
Even though there may be times in which technology increases the rate of structural unemployment due to factors such as: “inability to afford or decision not to pursue further education or job training, new technology significantly increase productivity, but requires a fewer number of higher-skilled workers. Or even the choice of a field of study which did not produce marketable job skills.” (Structural unemployment. (n.d.)) The government and economists still find that even with the increases in structural unemployment due to technology advancement, in the long run, it can aid the growth of the economy as a whole better, then being fixated on the current rate of structural unemployment alone. For example, American’s worry more about the future in terms of the ability to invest into education for their future generations and getting positive results than worrying about what is happening right now. The American dream after all is to: achieve better in the …show more content…
Unfortunately, most secretaries only know how to use the typewriter, so employers will have a hard time filling new positions because the skills of the secretaries do not match their needs. (What is structural unemployment? (n.d.)) That would then mean that those secretaries would then have to be retrained to fit its future productivity. This would of course, increase structural unemployment, yet, it would also (in the long-run) increase employment, furthermore increasing the growth and sustainability of the economy. The government just needs to make sure that it is providing education and retraining workers in the areas that it is needed, as this would also help prepare the country for future technology developments (if there are to be any).
First, Structural unemployment occurs when the entire makeup of an economic system experiences fundamental problems such as uneven labor distribution across industries and a lack of skilled workers to fill these positions. Structural unemployment is not caused by changes in supply and demand as the other major types of unemployment. Instead, this kind of unemployment happens because of significant changes in the use of new technologies such as robotics and a.i. Advancements can create
People can still restate it; first, recognizing “how much trouble we’re [Americans] really in,” and then, the citizens can determine the sacrifice they have to make to stop the declining economy and help the United Stared has the standard of living it used to have (567). Also, Americans have to accept that the government is playing an important role in the declining of the American dream and for that reason Americans have “become a hapless, can-t do society, and it’s, frankly, embarrassing. Here, Herbert offers a clear solution to bring the (wanted) American dream back, saying to his audience that Americans need to start taking this in consideration. Nevertheless, he presents a hasty generalization when attributing most of the economy problems in US to the government because what makes every country has a good economy is not mainly its government, but its citizens and the desires to prosper; Cal Thomas in his article “Is the American Dream Over?” [A response’s article of “Hiding from Reality] believes that people who think the government can make their life better are “putting their faith in the wrong place” and “displaying cult-like faith, which can be never fulfilled.
...r monetary or resource value to get the basic needs of the family met. Jobs are falling. Klotz points out those jobs are hard to come by for many people, especially the younger generation she talks about, being the 20-24 age groups (Klotz 3). Asher Miller, executive director of the Post Carbon Institute writes in his forward, “an estimated 16.5 percent of the population is officially classified as “underemployed,” the highest level since the 1930s” (Heinberg and Lerch xiv). There is no way to provide for a family; shelter, food, water, clothes, education and healthcare without a job unless you rely on the government for full support. Even that is limited in what it provides. Lack of jobs is a negative indicator of progress and growth. Even worse is the tragic combination of no jobs and dwindling resources to provide jobs, food, and energy for all of the nations.
Years ago, the United States of America was the prime example of prosperity and opportunity. In recent years, in the worst recession since the Great Depression, unemployment and interest rates have skyrocketed. The “American Dream” is an idea that was once a commonly accepted ideology in this country. It has since become only a fallacy. The “American Dream” is no longer an attainable idea, only a fantasy. The “American Dream” is not a true dream that will ever be equally attainable by everyone.
One of the major causes leading to economic inequality is the growth of technology. Over the past twenty-five years, technology has made improvements in productivity and has played a huge role in the life of everyday society
The run of human kind for more efficiency, productivity and progress may have just about start to show its dark side. For decades the universal truth was that the better we will be in those categories, the more everyone will benefit. Well, it is turning out that it may not be entirely true. This paper aims to argue and reason why we should be worried about future of workplace, its mechanization to be more specific. It is based on the fact that World has technologically evolved and mechanized in the past decades and some jobs are inevitably gone. We do know that those jobs are not coming back, but what we do not know whether the economies will be able to maintain unemployment levels between 5 – 10% in the long-term under such conditions, taking into account the world population more than twice as large as 50 years ago. In the first part, this paper we will examine the beginning of this phenomenon and its roots and the consequences it had so far in the real world. In the end, based on facts collected and knowledge gathered, potential solutions, of this possibly next great structural shift in labor, will be presented.
Technology unemployment is unemployment due to our discovery of means of economizing the use of labor outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses for labor. (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2011)
Economic growth focuses on encouraging firms to invest or encouraging people to save, which in turn creates funds for firms to invest. It runs hand-in-hand with the goal of high employment because in order for firms to be comfortable investing in assets such as plants and equipment, unemployment must be low. Hereby, the people and resources will be available to spur economic growth.
The structural-functional analysis of jobs in the U.S. is governed by the workforce stratification and technology. The more educated and diverse a society is the better society’s job market is served. This social economic separation of class has been both good and bad for society. Many workers at the lower levels of employment are both pleased and displeased with many aspects of work. Though this fact also holds true with most any job at any level, pay scale often compensates for endurance of a particular job type. The security of a person’s job also is an issue that in today’s economic times forces one to be prepared for change. This is to say that even if one’s field of expertise is needed today it may not be tomorrow. This type of ever-changing job market leads many to believe that another socio-economic change may occur at any time. This change was apparent with the transition into the industrial age and again in the information age. These concerns caused stress, various health issues, a...
The employment policies have not kept up with changes in the economy, workforce, and the nature of work causing a severe financial impact
The fact that United States is a Capitalist country, positions its people to social stratification. In recent history, the effect of this stratification has noticeably increased as income inequality is at its highest level in 50 years (Macionis 29). Technology may have had an impact on income inequalities as computers and machines have decreased the necessary number of workers for many jobs. Many large corporations have also outsourced jobs to other countries, possibly further compounding the issues of income inequality due to a lack of jobs for the lower and middle classes. This has caused a decrease in producers and an increase in consumers, forming an uneven distribution in society that again lends to the development and m...
Ever since the Industrial Revolution (1780s), the impact of technology has been subject to public debate over its effect on employment – does it cause unemployment or does it underlie the huge increases in standards of living (Jones 1996, p.11)? While it is difficult to ascertain the relationship between technology and employment, all that can be said with any certainty is that technological advancement has the capacity to create revolutionary economic and social changes (Jones 1996, p.21). In order to provide a clear analysis of the impact of technology on employment, we need to take into account the consequences of technological transitions and seek to relate these to social, economic, political, and cultural factors occurring at the time.
Soon these technologies that once helped make life simpler inadvertently made it a real struggle. David Rotman states that “as businesses generated more value from their workers, the country as a whole became richer, which fueled more economic activity and created even more jobs. Then, beginning in 2000, the lines diverge; productivity continues to rise robustly, but employment suddenly wilts. By 2011, a significant gap appears between the two lines, showing economic growth with no parallel increase in job creation” (Rotman). Mississippi, the poorest state in America, has the nation's highest obesit...
Unfortunately, there are many Americans out of work in today’s current declining economy. Unemployment can be defined as a person who is out of work involuntary, not by choice. These people are looking jobs and available to start work. Being unemployed can be disheartening and deciding what the next step is can be challenging. Underemployed can be described as being inadequately employed, such as a low-paying job that requires fewer skills than one possess. (Daly, Hobijn, and Kwok 2015) Making ends meet can be difficult for one who has been affected by this economy over the past few years. America still has a high unemployment rate since the decline of the current job market. And many Americans are struggling to establish the skills needed for employment, or the underemployed are force to lower they skill to make a profit. America’s economic status has force the underemployed and unemployed to make ends meet with the current jobs available. And last but not least some have also utilized these difficult times to venture into new discoveries to make life hassle free. So, we wonder is Americans giving up in today’s economy or do they settle for lower end job to establish a steady income to make ends.