Abstract
Public schools who have not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) by increasing student academic achievement are required under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), to offer those students in low-income families the opportunity to receive Supplemental Educational Services (SES). This research proposal will explore different types of tutoring models and offer an approach to help close the gap in the learning process of these students. Using a rigorous tutoring plan and implementing the plan early in the school year will give these students a head start in their academic journey. Assessment with a pre-test and post-test will be required to assess whether the students have mastered all the objectives taught during the tutoring sessions. Monthly assessments will also provide a guide for the teacher to help with planning and re-teaching as necessary. With all these tools in place teachers will be able to ask themselves to what extent will tutoring affect the academic performance of failing or academically challenged students?
Introduction
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation has mandated that children performing below grade level have access to Supplemental Educational Services (SES). This form of SES can be in-school, after-school, and private tutoring provided, mandated requirements of legislation are met. The practices of SES or tutoring should be aligned with states’ academic content standards and all federal, state and local health, safety and civil rights laws and should be based on high quality research evidence of their effectiveness in increasing student academic achievement. As a result of this legislation and corrective action the NCLB describes a school that does not meet its adequate yearly progre...
... middle of paper ...
...re covered, dismissing students who show great improvement and adding students when one is dismissed.
Support and Collaboration
There are many references you as a teacher can use to support your new tutoring program. NCLB calls for the program to have rigor and be aligned with the states standards for the subject you are tutoring. To what extent your tutoring program will increase the academic achievement of your failing and under achieving student’s remains to be tested, observed and studied for its effectiveness. Using the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website is a great place to begin. Another valuable internet search for mathematics is the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). These websites have information available for you to use in the classroom. There are many sources that are free for you to use just check you schools library.
Even with the negative and positive functions of No Child Left Behind, there are many areas that still need to ironed out. Under the Obama administration several states have received a waiver from No Child Left Behind, “with this waiver students will still be tested annually. But starting this fall, schools in those states will no longer face the same prescriptive actions spelled out under No Child Left Behind” (Feller & Hefling, 2012). Since 2007, the law has been up for review, but due to opponents of the law there has not been an agreement reached and the law continues to stress our schools and children out. We can only hope that when this law is reviewed and agreed upon that it really is in the best interest of our children and the nation as a whole.
The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is currently the educational policy in the United States. Prior to NCLB the educational policies in effect were “A Nation at Risk, in 1987 America 2000, and a few years later with Goals 2000” (Eisner, 2001, p.21). No Child Left Behind is a test based accountability system used in schools to measure their performance holding the districts, administrators and teachers liable and accountable for the outcomes. Supovitz (2009) States that No Child Left Behind was a major reform initiative intended to bring about widespread improvements in student performance and reduce inequities between ethnic groups and other traditionally under-served populations like economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial
Simpson, Richard L., Paul G. LaCava, and Patricia Sampson Graner. "Intervention in School & Clinic." The No Child Left Behind Act: Challenges and Implications for Educators. 40 (2004): 67. eLibrary. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is bringing down the American education system for the sake of academic competition with other countries that use better methods. This country hasn’t changed its methods in decades. By addressing different aspects of the problem, it can be solved more efficiently and quickly. Three different aspects will be addressed here: what the American education system already does, what other countries are doing (as well as cultural differences), and what we should be doing. What we should be doing is a general combination of what other successful countries are doing, taking advice from experienced educators, and abolishing stressful, unnecessary practices.
America’s children have found increasing difficulty with school. The curriculum in schools is claiming to be harder in higher levels, but the lack of focus and direction in the younger grades has made for decreased grade levels and lower mastery in several basic areas such as math, writing, and reading skills. Standardized test scores are at an all time low, as increasing amounts of children progress through the educational system having not at...
The program works with more than 100 schools in seven states. The program is geared toward students from low-income families. The statistics for children’s literacy in the United States are astonishing. “In 2011, just thirty-four percent of the nation’s fourth graders in public school could read proficiently” (National Center for Education Statistics, 2011). The program itself has had exponential success.
My three year plan is called the Strive for Excellence plan. For the first two year I will be focusing on the decline of test scores for the last three years. By making all staff views all 2,800 students that were below average for all three years. Requiring mandatory training for all teachers and staff should be complete upon reviewing data. So they are able to identify their student’s specific strengths and weakness. The teacher will know where they need to concentrate their attention. (Sue W. Astley, 2016) School improvement is an evolving process that takes constant progress monitoring and constant input. A special computer-based program is needed in Rocky Road School District to pull up records of any student or classroom more efficiently. This will also assist with the monitoring progress over the two years. A committee of parents and staff will be created to better understand the data, come up with methods to increase scores and to maintain the...
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) deals with student achievement standards by holding schools accountable for the achievement of their students (Implementation 11). The NCLBA uses standardized tests to chart the success of students. If students are not meeting standards, the school is required to offer tutoring, which is funded by the state with Title I, the education mandate passed in which granted all public schools access to federal grants, money (No Subject 7). The Act itself is not the problem; the problem is that the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) standard which is a big part of the NCLBA is not being met. The AYP standard is not being met because schools are not changing their methods quickly enough. It was said in the NCLBA that schools nationwide were to have 100% proficiency of the AYP standard within 12 years (Implementation 9). Since the passing of the NCLBA in 2001, most public schools, nationwide have not improved at all.
The achievement gap is greatly evident and impacts the low-income, minority students the most. Although the federal government attempted to resolve this problem with No Child Left Behind, the social problem is still evident. As there is still much pressure on standardized tests and annual reports, reformation is needed. No Child Left Behind has proven to be inadequate and rather highlights the urgency for education reform. Although the act is called “No Child Left Behind,” an appropriate title would have been “Education Left Behind.” More than focusing on test scores, education should prepare students in how to contribute to
If a child’s scores seem to indicate that they are falling behind academically, we can get help instead of allowing the problem to persist. Likewise, a student that is performing above and beyond their grade level might be given an extra challenge, be placed into a gifted program, or be granted opportunities to pursue extra interests. Analyzing test results can help an educator evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum or to help assess if instructional methods are a good match to a child’s learning style. Clues to achievement strengths and weaknesses as well as instructional strengths or weaknesses can be ascertained from analyzing achievement test
As Rodney Paige, former Secretary of Education, said, “We have an educational emergency in the United States of America” (Hursh, 2007). The American ideal of egalitarianism essentially states that individuals should have an equal opportunity to pursue their dreams, and an important part of being able to achieve this is attaining a quality education. Students of differing racial, cultural, socioeconomic, and ability levels should all have the same opportunities in receiving a high-quality education. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is seeking to change this. The NCLB is the current authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Houston, 2007), which was passed during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration. Every five years the ESEA is renewed. It is currently due for renewal in 2014.
Dang, Hai-Anh H. and Rogers, F. Halsey, The Growing Phenomenon of Private Tutoring: Does It Deepen Human Capital, Widen Inequalities, or Waste Resources? World Bank Res Obs (2008) 23(2): 161-200 Available at http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/citmgr?gca=wbro;23/2/161
Education is a vital tool for lifelong success but there are many areas of concern in the current system of public education. Education reform has been a constant occurrence since the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Every year, specialists develop
Over the years, national, state, and local governments have been looking for ways to increase the academic performance among academically vulnerable students. To boost these students’ academic performance, governments have been implementing many programs to inspire innovative school reforms to K-12 educational systems across the United States. Several studies have shown that schools employing certain practices are linked to higher academic achievement. This paper will demonstrate that teacher competency and the school’s ability to provide an emotionally supportive environment are school characteristics associated with higher student academic success.